50

[Original in Russian. Automated translation with minimal edits]

Russia's federal budget deficit increased again in July, the Finance Ministry reported on Tuesday.

Over 7 months, the government collected 22.112 trillion roubles in taxes for the treasury — 8.8% more than the previous year. At the same time, expenditures increased almost twice as fast as revenues — by 14.5%, to 28.567 trillion roubles.

As a result, at the beginning of August, a "hole" of 6.455 trillion roubles appeared in the budget — an amount equal to the annual budget of Moscow, four annual budgets of St. Petersburg and 11 annual budgets of large regions such as Tatarstan or the Krasnodar Territory. Compared to the same dates last year, the deficit has increased by 1.4 times and is already almost twice the plan for the whole year (3.786 trillion roubles).

The fundamental picture for the budget continues to deteriorate, states Finam strategist Yaroslav Kabakov: oil and gas revenues for the first seven months decreased by 16.8%, and the increase in revenues from higher VAT (by 24.9%) barely compensates for this shortfall. At the same time, the Ministry of Finance is spending more and more, and it seems that by the end of the year, expenses may exceed the plan by almost 5 trillion roubles, according to Kabakov's assessment.

Balancing the budget is becoming increasingly difficult, notes Ilya Sokolov, a leading researcher at the Gaidar Institute: the surge in oil and gas revenues due to the war in Iran turned out to be short-lived and was largely spent on subsidies to oil companies, whose refineries are burning and shutting down one after another.

Non-resource revenues are increasing only due to higher taxes, not economic growth, Sokolov emphasises: in the first half of the year, GDP grew by only 0.3%, and in the second half of the year, the economy may slide into recession. This will lead to a shortfall of 600-800 billion roubles in VAT, as well as in corporate and personal income tax, warns Sokolov. By the end of the year, the budget deficit could approach 10 trillion roubles, Khabakov predicts.

Military spending remains the main unknown for the budget: it is clear that it will exceed the plan, but it is not yet known by how much, notes Ekaterina Vlasova, an economist for Russia and the CIS at Bloomberg Economics. According to Bloomberg, the Ministry of Defence is demanding an increase in the military budget by 40%, or 4-5 trillion roubles. The Ministry of Finance planned to satisfy the military's appetite through debt, but in July it was forced to suspend government bond auctions due to the market collapse.

Most likely, after the State Duma elections, fiscal tightening should be back on the agenda, Vlasova warns: the authorities may cut spending on non-military items or raise taxes. Due to problems with raising debt, a new VAT increase is possible, according to economist Kirill Rodionov.

Since the beginning of the invasion of Ukraine, the budget has spent almost 50 trillion roubles on the war. To pay for the army and weapons production, the government spent three-quarters of the National Welfare Fund's available funds, introduced export and exchange duties, increased the mineral extraction tax, and confiscated private assets worth 4 trillion roubles. In 2025, income tax and personal income tax for wealthy citizens were increased, and in 2026, VAT and taxes for small businesses rose.

"The easy money for the Kremlin is over," says Agathe Demarais, a senior fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations: having started with businesses and billionaires, the authorities have switched to the wallets of ordinary people. This does not mean that Vladimir Putin "will soon run out of money, but he is definitely running out of politically acceptable ways to find it," Demaraïs emphasises.

...

Archived

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago

You can't trust any statistic coming out of Russia. They are waging a war and of course they will not give Ukraine a statistic showing that they are near bankrupcy. So take everything they say with a grain of salt, we know that they are meddling with their numbers

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

Vlad and don are more alike than I thought!

[-] Arancello@aussie.zone 12 points 12 hours ago

What did Hemingway say about how he went bankrupt? Slowly and then quickly?

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 12 points 13 hours ago

And then things got worse

[-] Tango@piefed.ca 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Why is the Russian national debt never mentioned? It's currently only $200 billion, which is only approx 20% of its GDP. Now, it's been keeping it low by selling off gold and diamond stockpiles and cannibalizing its own oligarchs's fortunes, and those options are running out as the article notes. But I just think it's worth noting that the debt isn't anywhere near the red zone right now. Obviously, though, if the deficit remains high then the debt will grow rapidly, but at the current rate of loss of (according to @MrSulu@lemmy.ml ) about $78.85 billion per year, it would still take several years for the debt-to-GDP ratio to approach the high levels that other nations have, like 103% for the USA, 201% for Japan, 101% for the UK, 133% for Italy, etc.

I'm no economist, though, so I don't know if the deficit is also set to grow rapidly, now that Putin's run out of pockets to easily pick.

[-] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 9 hours ago

Russia' low debt-to-GDP ratio is low mainly due to historically high revenue by fossil fuel exports particularly in the 2000s, when the ratio remained even in the single-digit numbers. But the Kremlin didn't invest its wealth for the benefit of the country and its people. There has been a high infrastructure gap in Russia compared to other middle-income countries even before the war, and social welfare and healthcare are lagging far behind of any modern standards.

Russia had favourable fiscal conditions, but the government redirected its pubic wealth to a few private individuals close to the ruling elite rather than to its people. Today, income inequality in Russia is even higher than in the U.S. and China. And the war in Ukraine has made the situation worse.

[-] Overspark@piefed.social 11 points 11 hours ago

The problem for Russia is that that's only good news if someone is willing to take on more debt. But bond sales were suspended in July because nobody was buying them, so there's no real path to increasing that debt-to-GDP ratio.

[-] Tango@piefed.ca 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Oh right, of course. Duh! I had a feeling I was missing something. Of course debt will remain low if the country is unable to sell bonds. But that's not good news for Russia, obviously! Thanks for pointing that out! I should have realized.

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Government bonds rates are usually linked to inflation. Over the past 5 years, inflation on the ruble has averaged 17% per year. That's the problem. The buyers want the 10 year bonds to be at 17-18%. There's all sorts of issues with this for the government.

I would suspect that a few oligarchs are going to mysteriously run afoul with Putin in the next few months. Confiscating their assets will fill the hole in the budget for a little while.

[-] Melchior@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Russia has suspended all new federal bond auctions indefinitely. That happened as the Russian government was unable to sell their bonds repeatedly. In other words nobody wants to lend Russia any money, regardless of their debt to gdp.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Because people in the west want the Russian economy to collapse so they lose the war. The media is just preying on people's wishful thinking. Same as the speculation a few years ago that Putin was dying. These stories implying an imminent crisis have been a winner for the media for years now.

These stories implying an imminent crisis have been a winner for the media for years now.

I don't see any implication of a collapse in the above. I see factual reporting of the worsening state of the Russian economy. Those of us who are against Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine celebrate every thing that shows economic struggles for Russia because the less money they have the less they have to spend on their unwarranted war, and the more they have to make hard decisions about whether money (or fuel) has to go to say farmers producing food, or to buying another thousand drones to hunt civilians with on the streets of Kherson

[-] Photonic@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Well the sanctions haven’t been cutting it that’s for sure. But once again the biggest successes have come from Ukraine themselves, taking matters into their own hands and crippling refinement and shipping of Russia’s biggest export product. That won’t take any immediate effect on the war effort but it’s a big hit for sure. We will just have to wait how that pans out.

[-] Gandhi70@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

Imagine how many real streets and indoor toilets all this money would have bought for the russian people.

[-] Cybersec@piefed.social 0 points 7 hours ago

Is that a lot? Sounds like a lot.

[-] Melchior@feddit.org 3 points 7 hours ago

If you use the official exchange rate it is about 69billion€. It is 3% of their officially GDP. The big issue is that international creditors are unwilling to lend Russia anything and even domestic ones are not happy about it. Also I suspect Russian GDP growth is not going to be great.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
50 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

11799 readers
400 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS