413
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 52 points 4 days ago

Ponzi called, he wants his scheme back.

[-] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

Well the jerk store called, and they're running out of you!

[-] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

Relax Costanza 😂

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club 67 points 4 days ago

"Top Economist" states the bleeding obvious.

[-] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

He forgot the: Because investors are now the only ones with money to spend.

[-] mHtt@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago

The problem with capitalism is that morons can get filthy rich and make poor decisions.

Example 1: US president.

Yeah, look at Zuckerberg, who recently burned billions on his crappy virtual reality project, and is now doing the same with AI.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The stupid thing is there are already profitable VR games that basically do exactly what Zuckerberg was trying to do. So despite the fact that he could just copied somebody else's homework he managed to screw it up.

[-] Avicenna@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

I mean really the same problem with Monarchy. Once someone somehow gets on top very hard to remove them and their descendants from power even if the original person or their descendants are complete idiots.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

There there. Give some credit to the American people. They're the ones that elected him. Twice.

[-] tinsuke@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Funny how the "Top Economist" just parroted what Ed Zitron, also quoted on the piece, has been harping on, since... checks notes always.

Edit: Zitron, the name. Not Zitrone, The German word for lemon.

[-] aim4harmony@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

Mr. Zitrone 🍋✨☺️😃

[-] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Sounds like the name of an Arcimboldo painting

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

When this is all over the world owes Ed Zitron a massive fucking apology.

[-] PangurBan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Most things work this way lol

Heavy unprofitable investment with hope that the thing matures with time and expansion resulting in profits.

"Top Economists"

[-] jaykrown@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

It's a giant economic bubble in plain view.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 3 days ago

Fancy being a top economist and therefore being privy to knowledge that is beyond the capabilities of us mortals. We thought the AI was a profitable business, and it turns out it's a giant scam, who would have thought it?

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

If you thought AI was profitable that's on you. Normal people have had the information required since the start.

It's also expected that new tech companies won't see profits for the first 10 years. That's not new.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

The other person was being sarcastic.

[-] StillAlive@piefed.world 31 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
[-] LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

“Top economist”? Sounds like that title is self given, as this is essentially how every single startup works, until long after they’re startups. Companies like Spotify and Netflix and every other big tech company worked exactly the same.

They’re all kept alive by investors until they’ve grown to a size where they can sustain themselves. Every dollar they earn from customers is re-invested back in the company until then, and they rely on investor funding.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 13 points 3 days ago

Why is it that almost all big financial situations in my life are Ponzi schemes?

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

This has Ponzi elements, but it's closer to a multi-company Enron in its structure. They're manufacturing fake revenues through circular investments. Nvidia invests in AI companies and increases their value while AI companies use that investment to buy Nvidia cards increasing its value so, so they invest more in AI, so they buy more cards....

Enron did this by making fake companies to generate fake revenue. Right now the tech sector is all working together on this scheme, so none of the companies are fake, but the revenue is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] redditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

Let's not forget that they're literally stealing from anyone who ever made anything in our entire history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qaz@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

I feel like everyone knows it's a bubble but that people are expecting it to be like the Dot-com bubble where a small amount of companies succeed, hoping that they invest in those companies.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

That's pretty much what is driving the entire AI "boom". It's the Amazon effect.

Amazon, and Netflix to a certain extent as well as a number of other early internet startups, lost money for around 10 years before they started making shit tons. And everybody wants to be on that particular ride. So they are queueing up in every AI line they can find to hedge their bets on one of them being the one that survives and thrives. It doesn't really occur to any of them that all of them could fail. Because "AI is the future". Except there is no plan to monetize any of them. And so far every time one of them introduces a charge, people stop using it.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I feel like it's just as likely that further breakthroughs cause costs to plummet to the point that any of the major AI companies will never even be capable of seeing a profit, paving the way for some yet unestablished or open model to reign supreme in the end.

Hopefully, anyway lol.

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Let's all short AI! Dimond hands!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Regardless, fuck AI and its speculators. Onward the Butlerian Jihad.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

'Profits are currently being funded by investors rather than earned from customers'

Which profits?

Ah, now I see the actual quote is: "[...] the AI boom's profits are currently being funded by investors rather than earned from customers." he means the profits of the shovel sellers, not AI profits.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] xylogx@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago
[-] Miller@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

The problem is two things are happening at once and they are being conflated. Financially a cannibalising house of cards is being built which is a common artifact of modern capitalism. But in the same process a means is being realistically sought, and openly expressed, to replace the human workforce. This second aspect is unique and when written plainly is far more stark than the more common financial greed fuelled idiocy half.

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

The goal isn’t consumer level profits, the goal is to replace workers, this is the first time capitalists are looking farther than quarterly profits. They’re investing in R&D to replace us, not selling a product. We are not part of the plan.

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

They are paying for fantasy about rendering people redundant, the sik fuks.

[-] Napster153@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

It's not even capitalism anymore, assuming they expect their peers in corruption to actuallg pay each other and themselves a fair amount.

[-] UninvestedCuriosity@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Oh my god thank you. Somehow despite being engulfed in this stuff being an I.T person while having affection toward Ed Zitran and full agreement on almost all arguments living this weird ying yang over the topic.

This is the succinct detail I hadn't clued into until this moment of what the core motivation is for all of the crazy spending that makes zero sense. It's literally this. There is no amount of money, lying, cheating or stealing that cannot be justified by the most cynical of capitalist if they believe this is the outcome.

It's such an obvious thing when you put it like that and I'm even sure I've seen it said before but it really hit me for some reason from your comment. They would move mountains if they thought there was even the smallest chance and bet the entire farm over it.

First you have recognize there is no barriers to their cynicism I guess but this is the only root cause conclusion that could be rationalized. That or fomo and temporary wins but for those spending and not on any receiving end, I couldn't make sense of the rational until you said it so plainly.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 3 days ago

I think AI could have a good tool for specific purposes and also a very lucrative business if only they had not thrown all that money at it.

The extreme investments forced them to roll it out prematurely over a much larger market that it could ever supply in a meaningful way.

They're trying to force a camel through the eye of a needle.

[-] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

They have been able to use it on less powerful deceives lately. I’m waiting for something like an ebook reader to be able to run an LLM. Imagine you forget who a character is and the on device AI parses the whole book and explains what you have forgotten.

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 8 points 4 days ago

Looks a little triangle shaped.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] webp@mander.xyz 13 points 4 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

These public-facing models are not the thing that convinces people with money to play ball.

The plan is not to have the AI eventually reach profitability through payments from the general public, or even by performing massive amounts of physical labor for companies. The plan is to have the smartest being on Earth outsmart every other living thing, in perpetuity.

Yes, this is a ponzi scheme right now. Yes, profits are being funded by investors. But the endgame was never "everyone gives us $20 a month", or even "Amazon pays us to run its robots". Those are ideas fed to the general public to keep them from destroying the data centers in terror.

The plan is for their AI to be able to buy stocks before they go up, patent things before they are needed, and run endgame around everyone's desires, including world leaders and other business men, so they can be controlled like a man controls a dog.

They are trying to make the last thing man need ever make, and that is what the big investors and the CEOs of companies passing around the same bags of money, are doing. As such, this bubble can and will continue until either they birth the sand god or the big money people and world leaders stop being convinced by the private, non public facing models, that the sand god is possible.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] antianarchist@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 days ago

What a smart economist that is. 2 years after everybody knew how this scheme works, they came to the same conclusion. Amazing. Now the world will for sure change. Thank you.

[-] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

Investors don’t create profit, they give capital, very different dynamic, I want this bubble to burst so bad

[-] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 3 points 3 days ago

Investment shouldn't count as earnings. You're literally borrowing the money...

[-] abc@suppo.fi 1 points 3 days ago

Implies that people are largely still pretty incompetent with it. The pioneers have a lot to win.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Fortune is part of this bubble. They helped create it by encouraging top management to ride it... And even here they still do "he said" reporting.

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I'm not sure it matters anymore. It's like they've found a way to make it not matter.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] goatinspace@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
413 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

87186 readers
3708 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS