155
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

I pointed out the correct terminology for comms here on Lemmy. This is somehow blaming a victim. Help me understand.

The irony of just getting banned, no warning, from a power tripping comm about mod abuse is just next level.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 81 points 2 weeks ago

Lmao abused by a mod on the abuse hotline. Maybe it sounded a little pointed since its just text but wtf a ban? Lmao

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's pretty weird over on lemmy.sdf and I try to just take ~~qrstuv~~ (EDIT: this was wesker, not qrstuv. Wesker also gets up to some trolling) as some odd performance art. Funhole, Linux Surrealism, and bun alert are great, but most every other community is run by qrstuv, and they can be oddly tyrannical outside of Funhole. Their entire account is practically digital performance art. EDIT: Wesker tends to be a little bit more "normal" rather than too weird to die all the time, but there's still a ton of lighthearted in-joking and trolling going on.

I'm pretty sure that community was originally created by qrstuv to bait someone who was being shit in the Funhole community into complaining about the legitimate moderation actions taken against them, then see how long it took them to realize they were being responded to by the very person who banned them.

My take would be that, yes, it is absurd to call correcting terminology victim blaming, and that's the "joke".

EDIT: I'd actually check the mod log to see if any action was taken against you besides a trolling comment. Would be willing to bet there isn't actually.

Also, the joke of going: "Item A: blah, Item 2: blah" should be pointed out.

It's not a legitimate mod abuse community, it's effectively a -jerk style comm for shitposting around the theme.

[-] aGlassDarkly@piefed.zip 23 points 2 weeks ago

Wow, that is a lot of very specific stuff to know that I would never have guessed. I can’t decide if this means I don’t spend enough time on here or if I need to spend way less.

[-] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 19 points 2 weeks ago

ಠ⁠.ಠ

Huh... That is really deep in the in-joke nonsense weeds, thank you very much for filling us in on what the hell happened here, I'd have had no ability to ascertain any of this without your explanation

[-] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

There's a Mitchell and Webb sketch about the Apprentice being full of idiots, for an audience of idiots. At the end, they note there are some non-idiots who watch out of a sense of irony.

"And remind me, how do these ironic non-idiots show up in the ratings?"
"They show up the same, my friend."

So I'm not feeling much better knowing this is a mod abuse done ironically.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

qrstuv complains that he got banned in subs that he had "never heard of" but looks like the reason he got banned is he went to those very subs to downvote a bunch of stuff. So I'm not thinking this is a real thing. lol

[-] pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 47 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hot damn a ban for that? I haven't looked at your history, which could change my opinion, but damn that seems harsh.

I personally don't think you did anything, maybe tone was slightly harsher than it needed to be, but that's all I see. Hardly worth a ban. Ban for me as a mod is like you systematically bothered my users or went on a racist tirade or something.

PTB

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean, even IF my history had awful things, this was my first time interacting with that Comm and it was in an effort to help someone obviously new to Lemmy. Seeing harshness in my message is evidence that we all read things differently.

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 17 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, if you had a history of awful things and came in it would make me read your comment differently.

That said, I saw no harshness in there.

But I will say that your activity outside of a comm is definitely a factor for me as well. I won't preemptively ban, but it will mean way less leeway being given.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think that's a troll community, right? The problem here is that you ate the onion.

[-] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My suspicion is that the sub is so tightly wound against "victim blaming" (aka, "not instantly agreeing with OP") that any correction is seen as opposition. My other suspicion, from looking at the comm and how often they mock this one, is that they tried and failed to play the victim here, and decided to make their own mod abuse comm with blackjack and hookers. PTB

[-] grue@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago

...Can we pretend I was calling Not Dr Wesker submissive? Please?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 16 points 2 weeks ago

Straight to jail

[-] VonReposti@feddit.dk 3 points 2 weeks ago

Well, obviously he meant sublemmy!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 22 points 2 weeks ago

That community is a giant troll. EVERYTHING is victim blaming there, which means nearly everyone gets banned. Got myself banned quite a while back for practically nothing lol

[-] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

everyone's trying to figure out where the victim blaming is, I'm more baffled by "you don't know that"

we don't know that communities are called communities? we don't know that subreddits are on reddit? I guess we need this mod to drop a list of the things we're allowed to know

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] albbi@piefed.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago

I only saw the top of the image before coming to the comments. I was thinking to myself, who tf calls them sub reddits on lemmy? (eww that word...)

And that's exactly what you said. I woulda gotten a ban too I guess.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm sorry this happened to you.

(It's a parody sub, so part of the joke is the wacky rules and bans.)

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

Dumb. I'm sure it's just the height of comedy to someone.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Even the OP's complaint of the post you were responding do was BS. He says never heard of those communities, but looks like he was downvoting a bunch of posts in those communities, which seems to part of his schtick. He wrote "subreddits" on purpose to get people riled up. The whole thing is BS from the beginning that you got pulled into.

Sure, it's kinda dumb and goofy. But at least now you know it wasn't serious, and your ban is only temp. When your ban is up in a couple of days, you can go and participate and even post your ban from there in there. Then you'll get a bunch of "So sorry that happened to you" And "poop in jail" comments.

I personally think that Lemmy is too serious most of the time. Not that I'm a huge fan of that comm's humor, but it can be fun to roll with it sometimes.

Unfortunately part of the joke is laughing at the newbies who go in there say something, then get banned. So whether you like the performance art or not, you've become a part of it! lol

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If this is "joking", I'd rather just block the whole "sub" and move on. Seems pretty low effort, like covering a hole with a rug and laughing when someone falls in.

I don't disagree about Lemmy being serious, but this is certainly not the antidote.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

I blocked it a while ago. I only unblocked it as a result of your post to see what goes on. It hasn't changed at all. lol

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I don't know what their deal is but they're some kind of troll. I don't think PTB is quite right, but it's close enough.

[-] seathru@quokk.au 9 points 2 weeks ago

Wesker is a wild card.

[-] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

The mods comment makes absolutely so sense. I want to think it was meant as a response to something else but it kinda just doesn't make sense in general.

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 weeks ago
[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sorry this happened to you.

[-] lath@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Mod abuse hotline is a circlejerk creation. It's not a place to call out mod abuse, it's a call for the mods to abuse you.

A play on words and interpretations...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 7 points 2 weeks ago

Haha, some people just have a stick up their ass.

Lots of sophist bullshit like this gets tossed around these days, so people can rationaloze being an ass.

[-] Wren@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago

That's an odd community. They don't like this one very much and they like to comment something about pooping in jail. It's either teenagers or performance art.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We really need a clueless user acronym lol. Or maybe noob user? I dunno, something to cover when the situation is just a matter of stepping in a cow patty while walking in your living room. Wtf is it doing there? Oh, my brother is taking the piss again.

Some communities aren't exactly normal, but you'd have to already be familiar with the fediverse and how some instances/communities are to know that you can't expect genuine discourse (be it from trolling, satire, or just batshit crazy mods/admins).

That's what you ran into here. Wesker is.... well, Wesker, and that means a lot of weird shit mingled in with some otherwise entertaining shit. You got hit with the weird shit this time. You didn't do anything wrong, you just ended up in a crack house while looking for epsom salts to soak your bunions.

Edit: also, you were correct and thank you for giving that information to someone with good manners the way you did :). Some folks get nasty about it

[-] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

Mods, please do something about all dis bictim blaming in this thread

[-] the_wizard_of_0Z@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Anybody can be a mod or the president. Hang in there.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Godmods - when the cure is worse than the disease.

[-] antonim@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Respectfully, both parties here have a stick up their ass. Nobody cares about correct Lemmy terminology, it's a clone of reddit, of course people use the same terms on here as well.

Relevant classic pic from 4chan

[-] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 21 points 2 weeks ago

Using the term "subreddit" is indeed confusing as i thought they rant about reddit, not lemmy.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yea I wouldn't think twice if someone said "sub" or "sublemmy", but "subreddit" would be confusing anywhere that isn't reddit

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

Holy shit, Flickr still exists?

[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

You don't know that.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

Lemmy is not a clone of reddit, we do have our own lingo here.

[-] Catoblepas 6 points 2 weeks ago

I guess the fact that was from 4chan should have been enough warning for me to assume it had a homophobic slur in it, but for anyone else not expecting it, it does.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
155 points (100.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1860 readers
20 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS