Susan Collins opposes Todd Blanche for attorney general (www.axios.com)

submitted 6 days ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Which means she'll vote to confirm and we'll have another mentally and morally damaged AG.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They can afford to lose one GOP vote and still get this sleazeball confirmed. (or 2 if Fetterman pulls a Fetterman). Or maybe it's 2 they can lose, but either way:

Because Collins' Senate seat is the most in jeopardy, she is the one chosen to be allowed to vote against him. It's all planned in advance. If they couldn't afford to lose her vote, she would definitely vote for him.

Murkowski is putting on a show of thinking about voting No (as usual), but you can be sure she'll vote ultimately yes (as usual).

Likewise the 2 repubs who had been holding him up in committee, Cornyn and Tillis, were always going to vote for him. They just wanted to put on a little show to pretend like maybe, just maybe, they wouldn't. Blanche's "agreement" not to do the slush fund will only last about 5 minutes after his confirmation.

God I hate all this shit.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 6 days ago

She's always the GOP convenient "bad guy" on divisive votes. Don't worry, Fetterman got her covered.

[-] Nobody@anarchist.nexus 17 points 6 days ago

Too little, too late, even if it was true. Collins is stained with MAGA forever.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 days ago

Susan Collins after Blanche fails to "learn his lesson" or whatever:

[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

She’ll certainly vote against him knowing he’ll be confirmed.

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026

96 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30729 readers

1992 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News