Elon Musk? You mean the guy who murdered all those children with a chainsaw? The guy who invented replicator technology, but only for CSAM? That guy?

Seems weird that fElon, who has killed more people than the Chinese Nationalists but not quite as many as Hitler (yet), gets to have his cake and eat it too with his web of companies. Somehow SpaceX, the parent company, is not mentioned at all here. Almost like they want to put some distance between this action and the tumbling stock. It's "of course we all work together" or "we don't even know those guys" depending on what benefits the moment.

"xAI" is a more professional sounding name than "grok" but he can't even be original. He has to steal Apple's "Lower case i" and change it to an "x". All I see is "TwitterAI".

I don't understand why he insists on making this a thing. I mean, i can see why he would get involved--he's a repugnant incel-pilled dork who has to offer compensation in exchange for sex because literally nobody wants to do it with him. This is how he gets his revenge on women for not acquiescing to his disgusting advances.

But looking beyond all that, i still want to understand why he believes it's so important that it exists--that he's willing to fight lawsuits over it. I don't know if this properly explains it, but i think it's important to see what they're saying about it.

In the lawsuit, xAI said the terms of service for using Grok prohibit using it for “any illegal, harmful, or abusive activities” that violate someone’s privacy, including altering their image to nudify them or depict them in a sexually explicit image. It said it enforces those rules against violators through account suspensions or terminations, and by reporting suspected child sexual abuse content.

xAI also said earlier this year that it has “zero tolerance for any forms of child sexual exploitation, non-consensual nudity, and unwanted sexual content”.

After a global backlash over sexualized images of women and children, Grok said in January it will geo-block content if it violates laws in a particular place, preventing people from editing photos of real people in revealing clothing in places where that is illegal. Grok’s “spicy mode” had allowed users to create explicit content, leading to a backlash from governments worldwide.

“We have implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing such as bikinis, underwear and other revealing attire,” xAI said in a January statement.

It sounds like this thing isn't going to be allowed nearly anywhere if it's as restricted as they claim it is. Which leads me of course to the fact that this asshole will do whatever he wants regardless of the law and anyone that wants to challenge him can try to get their day in court. Bonus points for their self-policing solution, lol. I'm sure Grok'll be turning pedos in left and right 🥴

He is afraid to lose the only branch that actually provides income?

But the technology itself is the problem.

Probably would save more money than he ever did under DOGE if he just stopped fucking litigating everything

Whatever happened to the legal issues this pasty slug was facing in Europe over Grook being used to do "nudification" for children?

Nudify musk

He probably knows he can't, but it would be fumed up from the discussion on limits of LLMs to attacks on his american :boldeagle: :ar15: freedum! and some challenge from lapdoggy trump's henchpersons.

are we the baddies