The brothers have repeatedly denied wrongdoing.
At least one of them has repeatedly bragged about their wrongdoing on video, and given instructions for others on how to also do that wrongdoing, so...
Yo dawg, he's not denying doing the wrong, just that the wrong he's doing in his wrongdoing is not wrong.
Sociopaths always do this. They assume the world will give them everything so they have no qualms at all about documenting all their misdeeds.
Can they just stay in there forever?
Social media influencers Andrew and Tristan Tate correct title is rapists and women beaters Andrew and Tristan Tate will remain in jail at least two more weeks It should be 2 lifetime sentences for those two slime molds The Tates have become among the world’s most polarizing internet personalities with their promotion of wealth, male dominance and misogyny through their social media empire. The Tates have become a symbol of how far money lets you take your misogyny and your violence against women. The brothers have long claimed that their violent and misogynistic statements have been taken out of context or were intended as jokes. Yeah sure, pimping and threatening and raping all counts as "jokes out of context". McBride said shortly after the Tates were arrested that “they’ve never done nothing wrong. They shouldn’t be extradited for crimes they did not commit,” he said. McBride is accessory to rape, violence and pimping if he utters such crap. The allegations, which span from 2010 to 2017, include rape, assault, trafficking and offenses relating to “indecent images of a child and extreme pornography”. Of course, those fuckers are twisted enough for shit like that. Put McBride on the same list as them, or else he would refuse the mandate and they would be stuck with a public defender. The brothers are already charged with rape, bodily harm, human trafficking and controlling prostitution for gain relating to three other accusers in the UK between 2012 and 2015. No shit sherlock. Andrew Tate, 39, became known a decade ago when he was a contestant on the UK reality television show Big Brother. He was booted from the show when a video appeared to show him assaulting a woman. There's fucking video evidence of him attacking women? i would say i am shocked, but in reality i am just disgusted as fuck. He has amassed more than 10 million followers on X Which means those 10 million followers should be placed on a fucking watchlist, just as it happens with anyone left of Margret Thatcher nowadays.
Like trump, there's virtually no chance they're not guilty of what they're accused of and much worse. And many people went to jail for life for a joint. People still to this day are killed for homosexuality. I think humans' most unique trait is that they can create a justification for any injustice, no matter how glaring.
Hey now, they can also vilify any justice, no matter how righteous.
Studies suggest that all our choices are unconscious and this entire thing we call sentience is a shameless justification engine, making sense of all the choices we’ve already made. It really do be kind of like the Oracle said to Neo that one time: “You didn’t come here to make the choice - you’ve already made it. Now you have to understand it.”
Pretty sure having a concept of justice is unique among humans in and of itself.
I don't have any source to cite, but I will say that it seems neigh impossible that there aren't at least some animals who experience something like "that isn't fair". I mean even just with dogs you can easily observe something akin to, if not, jealousy just by giving one dog a treat but not others.
If so, and I'm just having fun here, then it could be said that it's neigh impossible that they couldn't conjure a justification as well.
That pupper who got a treat needed it to survive and deserved it for all the good boy points!
[citation needed]
Seriously though, there are a ton of extremely gregarious animals out there, it wouldn't be too surprising if some of them have some rudimentary concept of justice
Aww, shucky darns. Anyway, how's everyone's gardens growing? We started getting tomatoes, but with this heat they've stopped ripening. And I've def. got a skunk picking and eating my tomatoes. I found the burrow. And there's 2 half eaten tomatoes just outside the burrow this morning. I gotta do something.
Only half-eaten, what a waste!
Terrible state of affairs. Deeply concerning.
Yeah shame. I didn’t get the jump on planting I should have this year and decided fuck it I’m just scattering wildflower seeds in all my beds to they have some kind of cover crop. The results have been so spectacular that I might never use the beds for anything else again! Working and working to get a carrot…? What was I thinking!
That's awesome, the bees, and other pollinators will love it!
My chillies have been absolutely loving this sunshine, had to prune a fair few branches down because they're reaching the ceiling from their windowsill perch.
Nice, what kinds are you growing? I've got some sweets, and on the hot side habanero, scotch bonnet, and aji rojo. If all goes well I'll be makin' hot sauce, soon.
I've got a yellow habañero sprouting, some scotch bonnets that have been going for a couple of generations after I rescued the parent plant from a garden centre, and some Rwandan scotch bonnets that I bought as fresh that are growing absolutely massive leaves
I'm very jealous, haven't had enough to make a decent sauce, most of mine have ended up dried and crushed into fine enough powder that opening the jar makes me sneeze
But it's unpleasant there, and they didn't like it. Those poor little dudes.
I hope their hearings drag on a little.
What kinda basis can they argue against extradition? Its for a crime in the UK so if you did it or not should be argued in a UK court. Not a US one.
Countries frequently only extradite if the crime they would be extraditing for is also a crime in their own jurisdiction.
The basic idea kind of makes sense, like you wouldn't extradite your own citizen to Indonesia for acting homosexual in public, or to Afghanistan for not wearing Hijab, or to the USA for being antifa, or to Poland for having an abortion.
It just gets annoying when basic moral agreement is a given, but some sort of technicality leads to long delays.
Andrew and Tristan Tate to remain in jail
I like it better this way
Yeah we don't need the rest of the paragraphs. This is more than enough.
A little shower forced sodomy and some random beatings wouldn't hurt either.
Good. Let them rot
I bet he's enjoying all the attention. Those guys 'love' a child abuser.
Wondering if the US is going to step in and save them at some point...is it really possible that they are too toxic for even this administration!?
Somebody asked Levitt and she said no. Not that you can trust her for anything but that is their official position.
was she wearing a cross, if she was at at the time she was lying.
Probably not since neither of them have just been given a red card.
It’s shameful the way these guys have been targeted by the left and persecuted, just for being rapers and traffickers. They should have instead been dragged out into the street and bludgeoned to death.
It's a good start.
Better they rot in an American prison forever than wasting legal resources elsewhere. They are an American made problem, the US should take care of it.
Keep the Tate Sauce flowing through the mail!
If Romania had just got on with it and jailed these two idiots instead of messing around for over a year and then letting them go for no readily apparent reason, we would not have to be dealing with this now.
Pssst wanna know a secret?
^no one cares - leave them in there and let's move on^
This just in: Andrew's name will be legally changed to Bernie, in order to better conform to his new beta status in prison
I disagree with this one, Bernie is a good name.
The name Andrew, however, has already been sullied, particularly in the UK.
:(
Sullied I say!
Sure it shouldn't be "Bitch"?
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/