498

The BBC has demanded that Donald Trump hand over his personal text messages in a £10bn (£7.5bn) defamation lawsuit over his alleged involvement in the January 6 riots in Washington.

The broadcaster’s lawyers are seeking to prove in court that the US president should be held responsible for encouraging his supporters to storm the US Capitol following his 2020 election defeat.

In their legal document, the BBC said: “In [his] lawsuit, President Trump claims that the BBC defamed him by editing his speech at the White House Ellipse on January 6, 2021 in a manner that he claims conveyed the allegedly false implication that he fomented the violence that followed at the Capitol.

“Thus, as the BBC explained and the government does not dispute, President Trump cannot prevail in his case if he cannot establish the falsity of that alleged implication.”

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 110 points 1 week ago

so the BBC is more effective than Biden's DoJ

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 70 points 1 week ago

My cat is more effective than Biden's DoJ, and I don't even have a cat.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago
[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

I get that reference!

[-] Janx@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Not with that attitude!

[-] nullspace@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

No, you don't understand! In order to preserve decorum and appear nonpartisan, Biden HAD to let Trump's prosecution flounder and die.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

🥹👉👈

Whoa! What the hell are you doing? Are you trying to get your self out on a list?

[-] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 22 points 1 week ago

You mean the list of people who prefer not to pay taxes to stupid, pedophilic old men? Count me in.

[-] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wait is that how you get on it? Oo oo!

Trump: 🥹👉👈

[-] mercano@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago

Taking a page from Trump himself, the BBC is going to bury Trump so deep in discovery he drops the lawsuit. If this case does make it to trial, there are so many interesting details that can come out publicly, including all of Trump’s businesses’ financials.

[-] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

BBC is still waiting on a ruling for their Jurisdiction challenge. If the Altman grants it, it is over. Also the trump team still has the 14 day Rule 72(a) objection to Lett's order. I have a feeling if they lose the 72(a) and Altman has not ruled on Jurisdiction they will drop it. Otherwise the trump camp has already said they will narrow the scope and drop the financial claim to avoid turning all of that over.

I haven't been following it very closely so I may have some things wrong but I really can't see anyone on the trump side wanting to take this all the way if Altman doesn't give them a big wet kiss on the lips and grant their 72(a).

[-] BeUnique@lemmy.zip 57 points 1 week ago

Calling it now! He changed his cell phone plan just like the secret service did right at the most convenient time ever wiping all messages.

Yeah, I remember when Bush deleted all of the emails, then shrugged and said “Ooopsie”

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes but his use of a cell phone to send text messages on the day of 1/6/21 is well known and documented. He cannot claim he didn’t and his inability to produce them may result in a default judgement.

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

He cannot claim he didn’t and his inability to produce them may result in a default judgement.

A default judgment is a step beyond what happens. A default judgment relates to a complete failure to engage in the process in any way (like failings to enter an appearance, failing to prescribe to the time periods for filing responsive pleadings, etc.) What a failure to produce because the document(s) (intentionally or negligently) no longer exist would be to create an adverse inference/presumption. This could lead to special jurry instructions, if it was material to the case, that weight against the bad actor.

Not that laws matter anymore but are his text messages while he’s president presidential records?

[-] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago

This is how you stand up to a bully, especially Trump and his legal threats. Call him out on it. He'll waffle

[-] SouthEndSunset@piefed.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 week ago

lol. The BBC being a moral compass.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Consequences?

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

Who even saves messages for years?

[-] Bubs12@lemmy.cafe 10 points 1 week ago

Telecommunications companies

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, good point. I don't use SMS so I forgot lol

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
498 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30666 readers
2244 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS