Linux recommendations for a beginner on a Mac? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 15 hours ago by butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works to c/linux@programming.dev

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi all, thanks in advance for indulging a complete newbie! I'd like to try Linux on an 11-year-old MacBook Pro (gifted by a relative), but I don't know where to start. What distribution would you recommend based on my background?

-Coming from the Mac world; haven't used a PC/Windows since before the pandemic. I'd prefer something that feels similar to MacOS.

-Not a techie. I've forgotten everything (everything!) I ever learned about command line because I never ended up needing to use it, and I haven't had to debug anything in a long time.

-What I'll be using it for: accessing the internet, various kinds of creative projects that I'll probably try making with FOSS software (something I've only recently started to look into), and making another attempt at learning programming (my interest will probably peter out before I get anywhere with it, though, because that's what happened the last two times). Probably won't be gaming. I'd prefer having the option to use mainstream office software in case anything happens to my current computer, but I don't actually expect anything to happen to it in the next few years, so that's just a nice-to-have.

-Priorities: works on old Mac hardware, good for privacy, decent software availability, not buggy, ability to avoid generative AI (i.e., no repeat of Apple installing the Image Playground app on my computer along with a software update, without the ability to remove it.)

It seems like a lot of people recommend Ubuntu or Linux Mint to beginners, but I'm seeing some people complaining that Ubuntu is has spyware(?) and forces things users don't want, and it seems like Linux Mint is usually recommended to people coming from Windows, so IDK if either of those make sense for me. Advice/recommendations appreciated!

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

I have run a few different distros on 2015 macbook pros. Debian works really well but you might have to fuss to get camera working and be careful with your display settings. Zorin and Mint run best on first install and Zorin is definitely the most mac-like with a clean design and lots of interface consistency, and it feels quite lightweight.

Ubuntu works fine but it’s Ubuntu. Fedora had some minor driver hassles too but otherwise is nice to use.

Given the age and capabilities of a 2015 MBP I put Zorin on the 8 GB one and Debian for a server on the 16GB (I have two). Ultimately reverted the 16GB to macOS 13 (via OCLP) due to not liking battery management for a server. I feel (but have no stats) that none of the linuxes were as good at power and battery management as macOS on those machines. Probably firmware obscurities or something. None are as good at the trackpad either, but you get used to it.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Thanks! Did you have to do anything to get wifi, fans, or the webcam working on the 2015 Macbook Pros running Zorin or Mint? Some other people have mentioned having to work around that on various distros.

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

Nope, zorin and mint were pretty much ready to go.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Wonderful! Thank you so much. I will probably try one of those two first then.

[-] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

A lot of people talk about Asahi Linux as a good distro for Apple hardware, I wouldn't know given I haven't tried Apple hardware for decades. That said, installing on the bare metal is great, but first I would recommend a virtual machine.

Using a VM you can try different distros, test different desktop environments, and generally mess around without risk to your data or the usability of your machine in the early stages of figuring Linux out. Once you have tried a few and found a workflow that works for you you can install as a dual boot or even ditch Mac OS entirely. I would personally try a few different desktop environments including KDE, Gnome, and XFCE, along with some of the more obscure ones like in ElementaryOS and so on. Linux is all about options and choice so try some things and learn what works for you.

Ultimately, don't take it too seriously. You don't need the right answer, there isn't one, just try some things and find what works for you. If it stops working you can always try something else later.

[-] Robin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Asahi is specifically for ARM CPUs

[-] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Yes indeed, I wasn't sure about the architecture for the machine and when Apple started their own silicon, everything is happening both so fast and so slow, time is a flat circle.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

re using a VM - I like the idea of trying out different distros and desktop environments with less risk. It does seem like a large part of the greatness of Linux is having so many options, and it would be a shame not to experiment. Thanks for the tip!

My understanding is that Asahi Linux is designed for newer Macs with a different kind of chip from the one I plan on experimenting with. I might try it in the future if I decide I like Linux and want it on my current computer, though.

[-] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yes, Asahi is for Apple silicon, not Intel, I wasn't sure when they changed over from Intel to Arm.

That said, if you have a fully spare computer which is not something you rely on for anything then installing the OS directly can give you better performance. I don't know how powerful your main machine is but if it is significantly more powerful than the old machine a VM may be faster on that, it just depends on the performance of each machine.

Edit: I forgot to add, I used to work in IT doing support and I had Windows 7, Vista, XP, and NT all in VMs for supporting customers. I tried to get a reasonable Windows 98 image running but the hardware acceleration and comparability just wasn't good enough at the time to make it worth it. It was fun full screening Windows NT with everyone else using Windows 7, it looked so retro and it was lots of fun to tinker with.

[-] TwilightKiddy@programming.dev 17 points 15 hours ago

By old Mac hardware I assume you mean x86-64 Intel Macs? Pretty much any modern distro should work on that.

If you are in general ok with tinkering a bit with your computer, I'd recommend Arch derivatives like EndeavourOS or CachyOS, these come with full GUI installers and software availability on Arch is one of the widest around.

Arch is rolling release, though, meaning each package gets updated as soon as a new version is available, rarely it leads to things breaking.

If you want something more stable, Fedora is a great choice, too.

As you mentioned yourself, Mint also exists. It's packages are usually on the older side, but the distro itself is trying to be this "gateway drug of Linux".

The feel of the system is mostly determined not by your distribution, though, but rather by your desktop environment. As far as I know, GNOME is the most "Mac-like" out of popular ones. KDE is "Windows done right", and there are a lot of other options, but you'll mostly have to try them out yourself until you find something you like.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, it's an Intel Mac. Intel Core i5, which appears to be in that x86-64 range if I'm understanding correctly.

I think I'd prefer stability over rolling release. One of the things I've really appreciated about Apple's stuff is not having to deal with zillions of updates, like I did with my last PC. I'm not sure what you consider to be tinkering "a bit" with a computer, but I haven't had to do that in a long time, and I suspect I'll be happiest keeping that to a minimum (at least for now). So based on this, I'll look at Fedora and Mint.

Thank you for all of this info!

[-] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

You can put Zorin on it and use the Mac theme it has to make it more familiar.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Zorin looks nice too! Thanks.

[-] TwilightKiddy@programming.dev 4 points 12 hours ago

x86 is the instruction set, 64 is for 64-bit extension of that instruction set. It's also known as AMD64 to make it even more confusing. All Intel Core processors starting from Core 2 are using that architecture, as far as I remember.

By "tinkering a bit" I meant sometimes digging up a package in the archives and rolling it back. I used Arch daily for around 2 years and had to do it once. You can also avoid it by keeping tabs on what the community says, broken packages cause quite a bit of fuss.

Release schedule is a trade off, if you are updating weekly, it'll usually take less than 5 minutes to download all the packages that got updated within that week. The rarer you update, the more time each update takes.

But it's all ultimately a matter of preference, just wing something up and try to use it for a couple of days. If it's not to your taste, scrap it and try something else, it's rare to end up with a setup you like right from the get go.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

If it's just rolling back a package once in two years, that doesn't sound so bad. I don't see myself downloading updates once a week, though. I'd rather have fewer updates, especially if they're well-tested and I can set things up so they happen overnight while I'm sleeping.

I really like knowing that I won't be stuck with whatever setup I start with. Thank you!

[-] Nester@feddit.uk 9 points 15 hours ago

This is a fantastic comment!

To add to this I would start towards Fedora as it's stable but also fresh, and as lots of people have been saying try Gnome as your desktop environment.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

Interesting, what do you mean by "fresh"?

[-] TwilightKiddy@programming.dev 6 points 12 hours ago

Some distributions like Debian get releases once per year or two, people tend to joke around that those are "stale" rather than "stable". Fedora lives somewhere in between, you get more testing than on Arch, but less than on the likes of Debian. Usual Fedora release cycle is once in half a year.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

Oh, OK. Once in half a year sounds just fine, I don't think I'd actually want it to be more often than that. I do like stability. Thanks!

[-] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago

Also, notably but perhaps not obviously, stable releases still get security patches, just not feature changes.
Don't think you don't need updates when updates means five different things.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, I'll definitely want the security patches on whatever timeline. I just don't want other kinds of updates frequently.

[-] lokalhorst@feddit.org 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I am a programmer and have a little server that runs Debian. On my desktop PC I run Linux Mint and I absolutely love it. It just works. In 2026 there is no good reason to got with Ubuntu anymore.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

"It just works..." oh, man. You're giving me deja vu from when I first tried a Mac. This is the #1 reason I've stuck with Macs until now, outside of when my pre-pandemic work/school required me to use a PC. OK, sold. Definitely going to be looking at Linux Mint!

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 7 points 15 hours ago

Whichever distro you end up choosing, consider one which makes use of the Gnome desktop environment - the current version of gnome is very similar to the Mac OS desktop layout so it could help your transition.

[-] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Blasphemy! KDE is the superior desktop environment!!!!

In all seriousness, I would recommend testing out either with a live USB before installing, that way you van ply around and see which desktop environment works best for you.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago

I have a 2016 mac with a touch bar and I've been dual booting Linux mint. Wifi, sound and the touch bar do not work, at least out of the box. May not be a good first time Linux experience if things don't just work well. Just giving you fore warning I would maintain a dual boot til you find something stable.

Alternatively Dells and thinkpads are well supported with Linux, they may not have the specs that the mac has but everything works and can be gotten used on Amazon for a couple hundred dollars.

Good luck with your Linux journey.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

Oh no, I was half-convinced I should start with Linux Mint based on other comments, but if the wifi and sound don't work on a 2016 Mac, I imagine that would be true for a 2015 one too. F that. You said that was a problem out of the box - does that mean you were able to get the wifi and sound working consistently later on, after all?

I don't want to invest in new hardware right now, but I might look into Dell next time I need new hardware if I end up liking Linux.

[-] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

If you don't have the touch bar then it's a different generation. Do your research or try it out. You should be able to boot a live USB at minimum. Trying not to discourage you but give you some realistic expectations.

[-] habitualTartare@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

kde desktop, which you can install or select as an install on nearly Linux distro as your gui. It has themes that you can use to basically mimic apple's feel. For hardware, framework laptops have great Linux support. I have a Dell and some things like fingerprint sensors took some tinkering to get working.

[-] Fishcake 6 points 15 hours ago

The only thing i’ll add is that Distro (stuff like Ubuntu and Mint) is far less important to your overall linux experience than desktop environment (stuff like KDE Plasma and Gnome) I’d do a little more research on your own about these choices before coming to a conclusion, but the opinion of a former Windows user who has only used Mac a few times in passing is that Gnome feels a lot more like Mac than Windows. Fedora is a good, fairly user friendly Distro that supports Gnome

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 5 points 15 hours ago

LibreOffice is generally a fine alternative to MS Office. I do collaborative writing with the MS world, and rarely run into any issues - mostly related to Track Changes. It's installed with the 'full desktop' version of most distros.

Python is part of every distro and a good place to start programming.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

yeah, haven't tried LibreOffice but it seems like a good way to go! I do worry about Track Changes having issues (that's been an important function for me in the past), but I'm not planning to use this computer for work right now, so that's not a dealbreaker.

[-] jrgd@lemmy.zip 4 points 15 hours ago

Probably your best bet for something similar in vein to MacOS would be any distro that ships with GNOME. Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, OpenSUSE Tumbleweed all either ship explicitly with GNOME or have them as options within their live installers.

If you know which model and spec your Macbook is, I could give better compatibility insights. In short, the Broadcom chips used for Wi-Fi, Bluetooth in the 2014-2015 Macbooks used to be quite problematic for many Linux distros, but I do believe the in-tree bcm43xx driver in the kernel should handle them well enough nowadays. Depending on exact year and spec, your Macbook may come with an NVidia GPU, which will require additional post-installation steps to install the proprietary drivers on many distros. As it isn't the primary display device on those models, there shouldn't be too many issues in getting the cards to function and render offloading to work.

Ubuntu discourse

Ubuntu is not really spyware as people may claim it to be. The main spyware claim comes from two sources: the 14 year old once-integration for Amazon services that Ubuntu shipped around the 12.10 point release and that Ubuntu does utilize more telemetry than other distros.

Often though, it's not a recommended distro anymore for many reasons. One primary one is that Ubuntu used to be seen as user-friendly and had a lot of community forum posts to document how to use it. Nowadays, most major distros have caught up and surpassed Ubuntu in usability and reliability, and Ubuntu's once-positive of forum posts largely tend to clog up being able to find useful information when a problem does occur because of how out-of-date many of those forum posts that still show up in search results are.

Another big reason is Ubuntu is not recommended is Canonical's (the company the makes Ubuntu) makes regular missteps and often falls on the wrong side of development for progress of the Linux desktop. See Unity desktop, Mir, Upstart, and the current misstep of Snaps. Canonical has also additionally put less effort into keeping that once-polished experience the Ubuntu desktop had and moved a lot of their effort into their server offerings. There have been relatively recent Ubuntu LTS desktop releases that have shipped with some baffling and often showstopping bugs that should have been release blockers. It's to a point where the QC of releases is often worse than what is found on 6-month point release and even many rolling release distros to where many don't recommend Ubuntu anymore.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

2014-2015 Macbooks are/were problematic? Uh oh. The computer I'd be using is an early 2015 Macbook Pro Retina, 13". A1502.

Thanks for all the Ubuntu info! Yeah, that's not as concerning as I'd thought, but it still doesn't sound like the best choice for me. Based on a lot of the other comments here, I'll probably end up going with Fedora or Mint.

[-] jrgd@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago

Adding to compatibility notes, it does seem that with the 2015 A1502's there won't be anything major in poor compatibility, beside the webcam not working out of the box. Found someone who documented their experience heavily tuning their Fedora install on their 2015 A1502. The author kitted out their Mac with a new SSD and better Wi-Fi card, which is worth mentioning. Some of the information is straight up helpful for even a standard A1502. Common stuff like installing the RPMFusion libva driver, EasyEffects equalizer presets, TLP are generally good ideas.

Mbpfan is also a good idea, but it looks like the package got dropped on 44 from a missing maintainer. May be recommended to install 43 for now if going with Fedora. I pulled the package source and built it on my computer, and it seems to work. Unfortunately I don't have an actual Macbook to test it on. I'll see about getting a COPR repo for it available soon, so that the package can be easily tested.

Some stuff, like disabling mitigations, throttled, and installing the FacetimeHD drivers are not stuff I'd really recommend. You can still go with any of these noting the caveats listed for each tweak. The FacetimeHD drivers are required for getting the webcam to work, so going through the hassle of getting those drivers to behave or just not having a built-in webcam is a choice to make.

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Thanks for looking into this and finding that Github documentation! All of this stuff still sounds complicated to me, but I'm probably going to have to do some learning and kitting up anyway. It turns out that this computer's battery is toast because it sat in a closet for years, and my relative never recharged it in all that time. I might as well look into a new Wi-Fi card and maybe a new SSD as well, if I'm going to be fixing this thing up with new parts anyway. Might have to wait a bit longer than I thought to get started, though. I don't know what anything else you mentioned in this post is, but I can learn. I'll probably try to figure out the Facetime HD drivers eventually.

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Mint would probably be a good starter distro, but since you've got an intel mac (I assume) there should be a decent number of choices out there. Having used both Mint and MacOS, I would say you probably won't have very much trouble with the interface. Plus if you get stuck, everything should be pretty well documented so getting help should be relatively easy most of the time.

If you want something more Mac-like go with the Gnome destkop when Mint asks during setup, but personally I like Cinnamon on Mint.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] homes@piefed.world 4 points 15 hours ago

I installed Fedora 44 on a 14-year-old iMac, and I couldn’t be happier

[-] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

Awesome! That's very promising. It looks like a lot of other people are recommending Fedora, too. I'll definitely check it out!

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 2 points 13 hours ago

Mint with Gnome

load more comments

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026

43 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

14421 readers

316 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev