This is one of those replies that misses the forest for the trees.

I see your point and I am tempted to refute it but I don't have any way to do so without giving you the sensation I'm an horrible person

Bestiality is another good option imo.

I think some of your examples are poor. Managers and co-workers can hook up if they are consenting. Yes the manager has power over them, but especially in a big company that power isn't majorly significant. Its also possible the underling is sleeping with the manager consentually for their own benefit and gain. Power dynamics can be bad but are not inherently rape.

Now that manager starts using raises, prefered shifts or whatever else to gain sex, thats a different story.

For inedbriation like if we are both super high, first time is questionable, but sexual partners that have been together for years and get high every day? Probably okay in most scenarios.

You could like, make sure you challenge other men. That's kind of the issue, it's not that there's too many men who do this to require this response, but that the vast majority of men are more afraid of confronting other men than they are being silent about something they're morally apprehensive about.

Pretty sure that's the like, one of the main things that sexual violence prevention education and research targets is that men are overwhelmingly complicit in rape culture.

You're not complicit just because you're a man. You can't take responsibility for billions of men.

You aren't complicit because you're a man, not to belittle your feelings though. I get uncomfortable around generalised terms in regards to gender issues, because I was always told never to do that, but it's something I similarly have to deal with.

Sometimes the conversation doesn't require your voice, and that's okay. Ideal even. If there are people with more skin in the game, they're more than welcome to have their say in my eyes.

“Virtue signalling”? Kinda telling using such language. I understand misogyny is a tough concept to grasp for many men, who often deny it exists and how pervasive it is - so I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt here.

But no, this is saying that how we socialise topics is important. And that society at large enables men to get away with such behaviour and by extent promotes it as acceptable.

I mean you can see all the hate people have for being brought up hating queer people. What if we swapped and rapists were hated by the church instead.

What do you mean you "hope" rape is objectively bad? Can you expand on that? I find that phrasing to be... Weird

This individual thinks a passage from a book about how common rape is must be virtue signalling because people already know about rape culture and is rudely farting this useless, nasty sentiment out loud

There isn't exactly a physical/psychological base drive to eat other people though. People desire sex. They do not generally desire eating someone, and are generally well fed. If you took a sample of everyone who has ever been starving to death, I think you would find a much higher preponderance of cannibalism.

Not disagreeing necessarily, just pointing out that there is a slightly different reason for the two things happening.