556
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 244 points 1 month ago

If I answered a question like that in an interview for a job at McDonalds, I'd be laughed right the fuck out of the room. This should be instantly disqualifying, but in this admin, brazen dishonesty and cronyism is a must have.

[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago

That's one of the most frustrating parts about all this, so few people are rational, so few people have standards or honor.

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago

It should be allowed to demand a duel if someone dissembles and refuses to answer questions in situations like this.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

That would just put psychopaths with good reflexes in charge even more than they already are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 month ago

In other administrations, too. The definition of truth belongs to the majority holder.

If the opposition to the GOP do not get a majority, and really a super-majority is what's truly needed... If that doesn't happen, there's no salvation for the United States.

I'd argue that it's been gone for a while, but I simply cannot give up yet.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

For there to be a real path out of this they need to be willing to strike a stake into the heart of the republican vampire party:

  • Fully reform the supreme court with sane people who will overturn citizens united.

(Personally I would add every goddamn american citizen to the supreme court because its a lifetime appointment and the public would be way better the corrupt nutjobs currently running the asylum)

Additionally like 3 of the following:

  • Commit to passing some real ass electoral reforms to enforce the 14th ammendment.
  • Commit to reforming the way congressional districts are drawn or eliminate them entirely with proportional voting mandates
  • Bring DC and Puerto Rico in as states. Threaten to offer cuba statehood and reparations if republicans invade it based on some kind of generational grudge held by rich casino owner's grandparents.
  • ensure the electoral college is handled on a proportional basis, if not eliminated entirely.

And then looking to the future:

  • address the corruption stemming from the billionaire classes
  • use billionaire money to directly pay reparations to people placed in camps by trump admin
  • prosecute ice agents involved in murders.
  • ensure all tech companies remotely linked to social media, search, surveillance or data collection are run as non profit utilities under laws similar to those we require for power companies.
[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

This is great. I wrote a platform in 2016 that included a lot of this, but I realize now that I should update my stance on these things to accommodate the new landscape.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

The very fact that he is so rude and not forthright, is because he knows it doesn't matter. This is all formality. His position has been filled, by himself.

[-] themaninblack@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s similar to a question that doctors will ask you in the emergency department: “who is the president?”

Alongside questions like “what year is it?”

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 127 points 1 month ago
[-] schwim@piefed.zip 82 points 1 month ago

If he were an outlier, it would be something funny but the issue is rhe staggering number of the pieces of shit.

Yeah, if the members of congress had any principles none of them would have ever voted in any members who couldn't answer basic questions in the cabinet positions.

This guy seems to think he's Göring in the movie version of Nuremberg. No matter what he admits to, can't say that Hitler was wrong, so he would do it again.

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Well, it is the US.

[-] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 80 points 1 month ago

Didn't even respond with the usual "Joe Biden was confirmed as the winner". Just refusing to answer is an even bigger piss-baby thing to do. It's a great and simple question to see if you'll put loyalty to one man above truth, and shows how much integrity you have in one simple question.

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago

If it's really a job interview then why didn't the guy move on to the next candidate

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Because half the hiring committee sees nothing wrong with this man's behavior.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] urno@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago

Kind of annoying that they don’t ask them who won in 2024 or 2016 too. Or first. Or a really old one like Reagan.

[-] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Yeah, ‘16 and ‘24 aren’t really contested in Trump’s mind because Trump won those (maybe; lawsuits are pending, etc) but the ‘20 election is contentious for fascist fucks everywhere.

[-] Piatro@programming.dev 33 points 1 month ago

Yeah but from an interviewing perspective it's a win-win. Either the guy answers the question for those elections more clearly, showing that he only has a problem answering the one about 2020 and therefore clearly doing it because of the orange man, or he still refuses and he looks like he can't answer simple questions.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

He didn't win the popular vote in 2016, which is hilarious.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Arancello@aussie.zone 46 points 1 month ago

He knows he’ll get confirmed anyway and whatever he does he’ll get a presidential pardon.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Not necessarily. A president can pardon someone who was legally convicted. He can't bottle a pardon for later.

So if after Trump the big cleanup will come, they all will have to face consequences, until some idiot later president will pardon them.

[-] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

After Trump will be more regressive autocrats because America was spineless in 2024.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Vietnam draft dodgers were pardoned without charges or convictions.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

You can totally pardon someone for something they haven't been convicted of. For example, Biden did this for him, his family, and others when he left office.

I assume there must be a mechanism that could be created to remove pardons though? If someone like Trump just pardons everyone for doing crimes for him, there must be a way to say they were corrupt, and they don't offer protections.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

An autistic person simply could not do this. Its not in our nature to ride trump's dick so hard that we could deny very obvious things.

[-] jdr@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

Obstructing the government is my special interest

[-] Reygle@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago
[-] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 33 points 1 month ago

These people are disconnected from reality and need real psychological help. In the meantime, this behavior is not acceptable for anyone in any kind of official position. Hell, this amount of deflection wouldn't even be acceptable if he were trying to be a fucking barista.

No offense at all meant to baristas. You have likely worked harder than this clown ever will.

[-] iamthetot@piefed.ca 16 points 1 month ago

They're not disconnected from reality. They are liars, cheaters, thieves, and crooks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Pathetic. My last shit had more integrity, and I have diarrhea.

[-] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago

Stealing for later.

The comment, not your squirts. Someone else can have those. No kink shame though.

[-] northernlights@lemmy.today 28 points 1 month ago

Love the questioning. I was hoping for a dismissive "ok we'll call you back".

[-] yuki_gassen@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"I'm not gonna engage in the theater"

Proceeds to make it more and more theatrical with every word

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] killea@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This man should have been taken away in a straight jacket.

Edit: also, the whole Jon Ossoff questioning is here, at 1:46:05. Good to hear in it's entirety: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9BYMPKDB3g

[-] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Mr. Ossoff is a beast - only in the best way!

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I haven't seen a more well-spoken, eloquent, and impactful speaker in years, dude. Where can I see this full video and more of him?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago

Post-truth Amerikkka

[-] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago
[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Wishful thinking. Have you seen the Brett Kavanagh job interview lol?

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

You would have gotten a better lie from a 5 year old who ate all the chocolate chip cookies.

[-] jaykrown@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I could never do a job like that because I'd just tell the truth.

[-] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

No transcript/no subtitle = can't watch this now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] trainsrkool@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

"do you know how little that narrows it down?"

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
556 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47256 readers
550 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS