510
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] carotte 37 points 10 hours ago

"i am angry at the company who’s killing physical distribution on console. to comfort myself i’ll glaze the company who killed physical distribution on pc"

??????

[-] titanicx@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 hour ago

This is the shit that makes me laugh about this. Fucking people simping for a billionaire, because they think he's their billionaire.

[-] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 8 points 5 hours ago

This is just kind of moronic. Valve didn't kill physical PC games it was the Internet....

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Why didn't the internet kill console games sooner?

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

Valve isn't in charge of CD production, they're just providing a digital storefront. Game publishers choose digital because it's more profitable when you can ignore logistics.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I don't know about others, but as an end user, I hates having to deal with physical media. Being able to just download any game in twn minutes is great.

(I know that there are lots of potential drawbacks with that situation, but it's really convenient, unless you're in a third world country with no bandwidth, in which case it probably sucks)

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 3 hours ago

10 mins? Well lar dee dar mr fancy pants :)

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

For something like a PC or main console I don't mind it but I've never been one to sell or trade. Something ostensibly portable, like the Switch, that I'm more likely to take somewhere without an internet connection? Sucks.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I admit I've never used a non pc platform, the deck was the closest I went to a console. I would possibly change my mind if I ever did, although it's probably a bit late for that.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

It's nice for retro gaming too but the original storage media is falling apart so emulation is the inevitable future.

[-] JordanZ@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I’m gonna agree with the other guy. That was the internet.

When Valve released Steam back in the early-mid 2000’s internet speeds were like 1-3mbps. A 4GB download (less than a single layer DVD) would take ~3-8 hours. I bought a physical copy of HL2(2004) to load it onto the computer in Steam for that reason alone. I also had the Orange Box(2007) on disc.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago

There's two main reasons why I like physical media:

  1. Longevity. If the maker/publisher of the game doesn't want to support it anymore or goes broke, I still have the game.
  2. Used game market. I've got a backlog of PS4 games I got cheap because they still existed after demand went down, so prices went down.

Steam meets both of those in different ways.

  1. Any game I've purchased on Steam has remained available to install, even though some of them aren't available for sale anymore via Steam. If a publisher folds, Steam can still serve their files to people who bought the game before it folded. This might change in the future and there might be exceptions where a publisher went to court to stop Steam from serving the files (not that I know of any cases of this, just acknowledging the possibility exists here while it doesn't for physical games you already own), but so far so good.
  2. Steam sales are often better than used game sales. Sure, not all publishers participate in them, but my steam backlog dwarfs my console backlog because I can often buy multiple games for the price of one used disc game.

They are both ultimately in it for greed, but a different kind of greed. Sony wants the short term make most profits this quarter every quarter, even if this quarter's strategy hurts next quarter, that's a problem for next quarter.

Valve seems to at least understand that not taking its users for granted and forcing shitty options on them to make a quick buck will mean they are more willing to continue spending money on their shit.

Also, Valve didn't come in trying to end physical media, they were a digital service from the start. Similarly, I had no problem with some games on the PS store not having physical releases and I've even bought a few. My issue is that the physical disc drive is one of the main reasons I even have a ps5, so saying they won't be doing them anymore mostly just means that the ps6 won't be as interesting to me. I'm not even really mad, just disappointed and moving on.

[-] nullspace@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago

To be fair physical media for PC has always been a bit different than the "insert disc, play game" you get on consoles.

[-] silicon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

For modern PCs most don't have optical drives anymore and it'd have to be USB sticks and there's no guarantee if It would outlast an optical disk. Kind of a tough situation for archival purposes.

[-] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

And to be fair, there are so many games on steam or GOG that I want to play, we can wait until they are on sale. Usually for a fraction of the original price.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Yesh if you ignore the massive slap that is the steam machine.

Valve got so good at doing nothing for a decade they forgot how to do things again lol.

[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 minutes ago

My gripe would be the trackers steam uses. I'm sick of that.

[-] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 hours ago

The Steam machine would've been amazing if it was affordable. You can hardly blame Valve for the AI bubble and current RAM pricing though.

[-] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago

Turns out if you don't have shareholders to report to, you can focus on making things better for consumers rather than squeezing every last penny out of them.

[-] sudo@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago

Yeah just squeezing every penny from developers instead.

You don't afford a fleet of yachts without stealing something from someone.

[-] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Barely related whataboutism, but okay.

[-] laurenceOfSuburbia@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Right? Damn. That's why private companies are better

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

Whooaahhhhhhhhh there, bucko, let's slow the fuck down there. There are PLENTY of terrible private companies out there! OpenAI, Anthropic, Pulte, and Kiewit come to mind.

[-] Aeder@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

That sounds like most of the terrible private companies are just companies that want to go public.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

This is peak Gaben simp meme. Steam were the pioneers of "you don't own the game, you just own a licence to play it" model which has caused massive amounts of enshittification of the gaming industry. Not to mention all the other bullshit they've pushed over the years.

But valve always gets a pass because dumbass games think "lord Gaben" is their best friend because he sells other peoples games for 90% off some times.

[-] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

I hear this more frequently nowadays, but it really is kind of misplacing the blame for this change. Steam went for this model precisely because many of the bigger game companies to this day refuse to sell their games as anything but a heavily restricted license. And Steam as a storefront does have to cater to them in that regard, especially back then. Even physical disks as others pointed out were technically not something you owned, but rather that resale and such was not enforced or enforceable. (You would definitely get some stern letters if you started copying and selling those games at larger scale, even if you 'owned' the original copy).

People do still sell DRM free games on Steam that you can copy and distribute to essentially your hearts extent without Steam ever getting involved. The license you have is for Steam to provide you the download service so you can get your digital copy (and a bit more). If you care about people owning games, then it's up to you to support and buy from the kinds of companies that don't provide you a license or (more likely) where the license is unrestricted enough to fit your description of ownership. The middleman like Steam you buy it from shouldn't matter if they don't exert undue control beyond that. And at least being on PC if you really must buy something with DRM you have options to remove it.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 7 points 10 hours ago

Idk man. I remember someone recommending spec ops: the line a few weeks ago, but said it's not available on steam any more. I bought it eons ago and had no problem besides controls getting it on my deck.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hayvan@piefed.world 216 points 17 hours ago

This meme is my pet peeve, it annoys me so much. It cannot be further from the truth.

Valve doesn't do nothing. They intentionally operate their platform in ways that keep customers satisfied, while making long term investments into hardware and OS development. That's not "nothing". That's doing a lot of things right.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 178 points 17 hours ago
load more comments (27 replies)
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 points 12 hours ago

You can't stop selling physical copies if you never sold physical copies in the first place

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] far_university1990@reddthat.com 55 points 17 hours ago

invest in open ecosystem

maintain and develop platform for user

70/30 cut to offer thing on market

run gambling system

"nothing"

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] JelleWho@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago

'doesn't make there products intentionally shit' and 'competition shoots themzelfs in the head'. I think I know why they are winning the race

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
510 points (100.0% liked)

memes

21778 readers
3108 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS