Strong left bias, but "mostly factual" rating from mbfc
Mbfc also calls hasbara rags like Times of Israel "left leaning and mostly factual".
Guess that's middle of the lane for most people then.
MBFC is almost entirely created by one person (6 named on site, but 1 is by far the controlling authority).
Nobody is without bias, but a large organisation of many varying views can temper it to a tolerable amount. To say that a near one man operation can act without bias though is ridiculous.
To rely on MBFC to determine the credibility of a news source is like outsourcing your critical thinking to somebody else. They're a hack organisation as much as the organisations they claim to call out.
Didn't Farage make a great deal about this sort of thing happening to him?
Yeah, but that was when he was dropped by a high net-worth bank for being insufficiently high net-worth.
He just pretended he was being cancelled.
Not the first attack on The Canary from the usual suspects.
"One of its first targets was The Canary, a pro-Corbyn website that was achieving 8.5 million hits a month.
Working closely with the anti-Corbyn Jewish Labour Movement, the book says McSweeney secretly recruited Countdown co-presenter Rachel Riley to front a campaign targeting The Canary’s advertisers with claims the outlet was antisemitic.
The Canary was later cleared by the independent regulator Impress (a fact Pogrund and Maguire don’t mention), but the damage was done. The Canary “went down from 22 staff to one member of staff within a few months of us targeting it,” SFFN crowed.
“Bye bye Birdie!!!” tweeted Rachel Riley."
https://www.declassifieduk.org/morgan-mcsweeney-plot-without-precedent-in-labour-history/
London’s banks are some of the oldest evil organisations going. A building society would likely be safer as then the members get to vote on whether to debank you.
Causes of de-banking in the UK:
Risk appetite: Some businesses presented an unacceptable level of business risk to banks to three of the UK’s major banks.
Financial crime prevention: Some accounts were closed due to financial crime concerns. Indeed, banks have a legal and regulatory obligation to stop/prevent money laundering and other financial crime.
Information sharing: Banks closed accounts due to being unable to complete their customer due diligence because of a lack of information sharing from customers.
Reasons for giving no notice, from the same article:
...a spokesperson for UK Finance who commented as follows:
“Customers should receive good communication about their accounts and a notice period should be served before an account is closed. However, there may be exceptions to this if, for example, money-laundering is suspected. ...”
Yup deffo AML check. Next they'll complain that they asked why their funds have been withheld but weren't given an answer IT MUST BE A CONSPIRACY! No, love, it's AML laws.
You don't understand, Lloyd's decision was clearly a direct order from our ZOG. Don't you know, everything is connected.
bft
United Kingdom
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.