36
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net to c/gardening@lemmy.world

So, you've probably never heard of silicate/ silicon use in plants. It's included in no fertiliser I know of, and "only" semi-essential.

I grow pretty much all of my plants hydroponically, and the fertiliser I use has all nutrients (micro and macro) included. All of them grow healthy and fast, without any signs of deficiencies, probably even twice as fast as in soil.

But I often had the feeling that "something" is missing.
They get hugely stressed when drying out (including nutrient burn), get light or heat stress, and I had to fight pests all the damn time I couldn't get rid of, even with systemic pesticides.
This may sound more hard on paper than it is in reality, but it still was a bit annoying. They grow well, but are physically weak.

This also isn't some obscure hydro issue, soil plants have it as well. Most soils are lacking silicon as well.

Silicon (in form of silicates) is known to fix that. It reinforces cell walls, both in the leaves/ stem and the root system. It makes them tougher and therefore more resistant to wind, heat, pests, drought, nutrient burn, light, pathogens, and so on. It also improves nutrient absorption, and can be just as powerful against powdery mildew or other fungal infections as fungicides according to a study I read.

If it is THAT great, why isn't it used everywhere?!

Simple. Because it's chemically unstable and hard to include in your standard fertiliser. And even if it already is in soil, or applied via plant extracts like nettle tea, it's not that bioavailable.

The benefits have been known to commercial growers for ages.

The most widely used form is potassium silicate. Which is shit imo. It's highly alkaline, so even a bit throws off the pH and hinders nutrient absorption, so you have to adjust the pH all the time, adding junk into your nutrient solution. It also degrades very quickly, so you have to apply it multiple times a week, preferably via foliar application.
That's why it doesn't make sense to use it for hobbyists.

So, what's the solution? Another form!
Tetraethyl silicate (TEOS).

I've been using Grow Genius Mono-silicic for a few weeks now, and the results are phenomenal. But I have to say, this product is overpriced for what it's made out of. You can get TEOS way cheaper, it's wide spread in chemical industry.

Compared to potassium silicate, it

  • doesn't alter the pH
  • doesn't polymerise as fast, making it way more stable in solution, and
  • is more concentrated

I currently use the recommended dose in my nutrient solution, and apply it via foliar spray weekly for now.

I noticed its effects most strongly on my cannabis plants.
The leaves got very rough, almost like velcro at this point.

When I bend a stem now, it really cracks, which it didn't before.

And it grows more compact, tolerating almost double the light intensity than my last grows, resulting in WAY faster growth.

My living sphagnum moss also got more robust. It can tolerate more fertiliser and doesn't instantly die when dry. Before silicate, it felt spongy, and now more like wet steel wool.

And most of my houseplants now look like fake plastic plants. Especially my calatheas just shrivelled up and got crispy before when I forgot to water them. The leaves are thicker and glossy.

It also helped to get rid of the powdery mildew that plagued my mums' zucchini plant.

All in all, I'm really pleasantly surprised that it works THAT well. 10/10, would recommend :)

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Huh, didn't know that gardeners were essentially doing silica sol-gel syntheses. A note of caution: contact with TEOS and other organosilicates can and will cause permanent eye and lung damage (converts to silica, and, broadly, rocks in lungs bad). Make sure your work area is well ventilated and ideally use some kind of eye protection against splashing, don't touch you're face, and wash up when done. TEOS is less reactive once in contact with water (it hydrolyzes to silicic acids and eventually silica, with rates depending strongly on pH).

Also note that adding TEOS to water does slightly lower pH due to this hydrolysis reaction, but it is much less severe of an adjustment than potassium silicate.

[-] Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, thanks for the warning ๐Ÿ‘ As a chemist myself, guys, please read the fucking warn labels on the bottle! They are there for a reason.

Also note that adding TEOS to water does slightly lower pH due to this hydrolysis reaction, but it is much less severe of an adjustment than potassium silicate.

Yeah, sure, but the concentration is 1 drop per litre. Synthetic fertilisers have a phosphate buffer (pH 5,8) in them, and I didn't notice anything ๐Ÿคท

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'm nervous about teos - nilered was using it and made sure it was under a fume hood I'm pretty sure. But this is an interesting observation thank you! It's overpriced by comparison but I ended up buying a plant nutrient silicate more like the one you used ๐Ÿ˜… curious to see how this might help my alocasia. And my lime tree.

I don't think I'll dose my aquarium (which has a banana tree) only because there's a good chance diatomic algae will use any available silicates before the plants can. Also who knows if it would be safe for fish. I think reef aquarium people dose some other silicates probably way way more expensive!

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I have nothing contribute, just wanted to remark on how well researched and through this post was. Good job Guenther ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿพ

[-] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Tech industry used TEOS for depositing silica dielectric layers, hopefully at different concentrations from the fertilizer since I remember it being marked as a skin/eye irritant, inhalation hazard, and flammable! I never would've thought to use it as an amendment for plants - impressive results!

[-] Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, you're right. As a pure chemical, you have to be careful handling it, but diluted it's completely harmless due to hydrolysis.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

If it's that effective, do you plan to use less in the future?

[-] Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Yes. I think I can reduce the foliar application to once or twice a month, when I finally got rid of my thrips infestation of my houseplans, or when the active growing season on my balcony is over.

Right now I "loaded" up the silicate because they never received any before.

And root application no, it's just 1 drop per litre.

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Using silica is hit or miss in agriculture. It depends on the chemical makeup of the soil. Many soils have plenty of it available in the soil already.

[-] Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Not really. Bioactive silicon (mono silicic acid) is completely different from silica or silicon dioxide (rock/ sand).

There are many studies, with wheat or corn for example, that show that most soils are significantly lacking it and adding it artificially helps with their growth and health.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Any additives when farming are specific to each farm. If itโ€™s rich in nitrogen, adding some isnโ€™t beneficial.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)

Gardening

6582 readers
50 users here now

Your Ultimate Gardening Guide.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS