338
A meme (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chaunticleer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 minute ago

Op: I think I'll instantly summon all of .ml for a flame war

[-] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

The same "care about human rights" used to justify bombing countries?

[-] Chaunticleer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 minutes ago

Oh man if there's one thing about being left it's being pro war. Maybe stick to drawing people as soyjacks, big guy

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Oh look another .world account that couldn't differentiate between a soc dem and a Dem's sock. Hows your cosplay fitting?

[-] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

US dude, maybe elaborate because not everyone is living in your head. What's up with your social democrats?

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Funny how accounts like yours make horrible tanky memes, get ratioed to shit by half the comment section but maintain top level up votes in surplus of usual community activity. Real strange.

[-] darthelmet@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Do you not believe the US or the other imperialist nations have lied about their enemies at all? If not, do you understand why people should at the very least be suspicious of any claims made by known liars who have an interest in the narrative presented?

Not to say that any of these states have never done any wrong. None of us want the bad things and it's useful to critically analyze past failures to do better in the future. But it's hard to sift through the lies to find the truth so we can do that in any useful way.

Considering that the failures of the past aren't what we want for the future, demonizing these societies isn't particularly useful. It just serves the interest of the currently dominant powers. You can say that it doesn't and that you also don't like the US, but if your position on every country or movement that the US labels as an enemy is conveniently aligned with them... then... it's doing it's job whether you intend it to or not. It's just stoking more red scare sentiment, which gets used against even whatever you think "real leftists" are. It's not like the McCarthy hearings only went after secret soviet spies. It was just a tool to go after political opponents. It's this fear that allowed the US to justify becoming the biggest military in the world, invading tons of countries, spying on everyone, etc.

If we were to actually identify an agreed upon truth of some bad thing done by these states, I wouldn't disagree with you. However, in the context of a world dominated by the US and it's allies, this just doesn't serve a purpose. We need to work on ways to move forward and deal with capitalism. This doesn't do that. It just helps to justify the current world order.

[-] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 16 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I haven't seen one shred of evidence through all of their trolling that suggests OP isn't literally a liberal that doesn't know what leftism is and has it confused with social progressivism. Not even in a 'dem socs aren't leftist' way I mean I suspect they do actually support the continuation of capitalism.

*before downvoting me this is a quote from OP

tHe Bourgeoisie lol when do you people live smh

like...

**oh nevermind they self identified as anarchist somewhere. Explains the childish trolling and inability to read I guess. I genuinely thought they were a lib that got lost.

[-] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

You're confusing capitalism with the freedom not to end up in the Gulag for every little thing.

[-] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

~~Explain what leftism is and what makes you a leftist~~ made this comment before I saw they call themself anarchist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 hours ago

You can care all you want about human rights, that doesn't mean you're not falling for propaganda.

The CIA once overthrew the peaceful, democratic government of Iran, and covered up their involvement for decades. Why would they not be able to do similar things today? Did they just woke up one day and suddenly get a change of heart, after facing no consequences for their actions? And that's just one example, they did similar things in so many countries all around the globe. You just don't often hear about it, because, well...

If you don't think the feds are capable of exploiting concern about human rights to influence people's opinions, I don't even know what to tell you.

[-] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Yea sure lol whatever you think anyone was asking for and makes sense in your head.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 hours ago

I have no idea what that even means.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 hours ago

Too bad Stalin stopped at Berlin.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 7 hours ago

What even is a "tankie" its a meanigless buzzword use to critize anyone opposing imperialism or pointing out obvouis lies spread by things like falun gong or radio free asia just useless nonsense.

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's not a meaningless buzzword; we all know what a tankie is, the term has been around and in use for many decades.

So... what does "what", "even", and "is" mean? I'm just asking honest questions.

[-] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 13 points 7 hours ago

No, Tankies are people advocating for using force to suppress whatever they deem not acceptable. This isn't nonsense, this is a 2-class society: the rulers and the people which do not count.

[-] LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 hours ago

"Tankies" are people who actually understand how imperialism and hegemony work. They are able to look past their prejudices using material analysis to recognize who perpetrates imperialism vs those who are victimized by it and struggles against it. "Tankies" stand in support of the latter. Whereas People who use "tankies" as a pejorative (sometimes now called dronies) are those who have failed to sift out from the deluge of propaganda (that we are all saturated by) those specific lies that they want to believe in. They remain ignorant, usually willfully, because it is easier and oftentimes beneficial to them to believe that, for instance, the groups of people their government tells them are evil and "authoritarian" really are evil and "authoritarian."

While it is ultimately a failure of understanding how the world actually works that the drony suffers from, it is often rooted in a failure of self reflection, the refusal to recognize their prejudices, biases, and the material reasons behind their wilful ignorance. So of course the dronies hate people who are willing to hold up a mirror and then look out and see the world as it is, because those people are a reminder and representation of all the things the dronies in their cowardice refuse to look at. Hence we get frothing know-nothings who think they're leftists whinging and even raging about those terrible "tankies."

[-] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago

Tankies are people advocating for using force to suppress whatever they deem not acceptable.

So when Barack Obama claimed the right for the US President, to drone strike anyone deemed a terrorist, without trial, did that make him a Tankie?

[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 hours ago

everyone supports the use of force though do you not think force should be used to stop a rapist thats a meaningless definition.

[-] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 7 points 5 hours ago

Lol yeah rape and holding up empty pieces of paper on the red square are very much the same.

Your take isn't hot, it's braindead

[-] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Holy false equivalency, Batman! We can both throw straw man examples back and forth all day long. But you know damned well what kind of force they were referring to, and what kind of “crimes” that force would be used to stop. There’s a vast difference between rape and protesting against the government. And the fact that you’re trying to equate them means you’re approaching the argument from a fundamentally skewed perspective and likely aren’t arguing in good faith.

[-] LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 hours ago

They were very clearly not making any equivalency let alone a false equivalency. They were using an example that we all would agree on as a demonstration. This is a rhetorical device and a perfectly valid, frequently used one at that. But the fact that you and apparently a couple others are trying to make it out as if they were saying "r*** is the same thing as protesting" is disgusting and revealing of your own motives.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
338 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

7109 readers
971 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Try to use alt text or image descriptions to allow for greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We encourage alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.


  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS