48
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jrs100000@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Its called inflation. And billionaires dont hoard money, they hoard assets. Most of the time inflation just makes them richer, as salaries drain out year over year and their stock prices keep going up.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 5 days ago

It’s fucking sad you even need the +. Billionaires should not exist, even less so trillionaires.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

You mean gift cards?

[-] 7uWqKj@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

Please note that Elon Musk doesn’t hoard money in the same way that Scrooge McDuck does

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Man, I wish the world's richest man was just a cheap skate instead of a corrupt sociopathic nazi fraud edgelord.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That's pretty much always been an apt description of the World's richest person.

[-] RavenofDespair@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Yes but he does hoard wealth and assets.

[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

Still waiting for further explanation.

[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

Please explain.

[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And schools should have economics and personal finances as part of the curriculum.

Nobody is hoarding money. Scrooge McDuck is a bad caricature of a rich person - that's not how any of it works.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

And schools should have economics and personal finances as part of the curriculum.

the problem with this "common sense" approach is that it emphasizes and reinforces personal responsibility in a system that's rigged to take advantage of every human foible.

I call this the "late-fee" fallacy. As in the idea that video store late fees are intended to encourage responsible behavior, not a revenue stream that the business relies on. Overdraft fees are another great example.

Financial responsibility would ruin the economy.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 week ago

It does. It’s called inflation.

Modern millionaires don’t hoard cash, just like ancient millionaires didn’t hoard apples or wheat. Sure, millionaires always had something perishable, but most of the wealth was/is tied in things like land, buildings, companies, ships, cattle, slaves, stocks, bonds, loans etc.

[-] RavenofDespair@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Inflation has little impact on the wealthy. I should have said wealth or assets

[-] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It makes them invest their money which puts it to good use. That makes credit cheaper for everyone else.

Inequality is an issue, but that's what taxes are for. You don't solve inequality by breaking the economy.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah that’s a good clarification. If land and old paintings had had an expiration date…

[-] justaman123@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I mean the Mexican government makes it so that land can only be owned for 100 years.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

That still means that the rich kids can inherit land from their billionaire parents. Generational wealth can still exist.

[-] justaman123@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah, also the leases can be renewed and it just ends up being a way to collect taxes.

[-] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

That would disproportionately affect the poor since the money owned by the wealthy is overwhelmingly tied up in other assets, index funds etc

[-] RavenofDespair@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Your right I should have said wealth or assets

[-] Infrapink@thebrainbin.org 7 points 1 week ago

This has actually been tried. It's called [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demurrage_currency](demurrage currency). Basically, every note decreases in value every week: in 1930s Austria, this was accomplished by requiring people to get regular stamps to keep their money good, but every stamp reduced the value of the note.

This encourages people to spend money instead of hoarding it, but the obvious downside is that it makes saving functionally impossible.

[-] RavenofDespair@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

very cool thanks :)

[-] username_1@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, only already rich should have an ability to use capital. Peons should be stripped of even theoretical possibility to get any capital-tier sum. Only gas and bread money.

[-] RavenofDespair@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I was thinking more of people having what they can use and not horad wealth and assets.

[-] aritzg@tardigram.com 2 points 1 week ago

Absolutely not

[-] Miller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Hoarding is not illegal, maybe it should be, certainly at scale but currently it is not so measures to stop it are not lawful at this time.

[-] frisbird@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Lol. The way you make something illegal is by passing laws. It's not unlawful to pass laws

[-] Miller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Hoarding is not the correct way to think of billionaires amassing grotesque wealth, hoarding is the old couple putting cash under the bed. For the old couple it is their money and their business. What billionaires do is a significant societal drain on resources and should be dealt with accordingly, akin to war crimes.

[-] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I feel like we want constant deflation instead of inflation.

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Deflation makes dollars MORE valuable, and thus discourages commerce.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Do you mean cash, money, or wealth?

[-] RavenofDespair@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Sorry I should have said wealth or assets.

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
48 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

42555 readers
807 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS