"Can I see the evidence"
"No"
"Can I see the evidence"
"No"
He probably had a girlfriend from out of town that nobody knew in highschool.
“She Canadian! You cant meet her.”
If you can't prove it, then you have no argument and you're just pounding your fist on the table. Typical Republican strategy.
Why are people falling for this shit!? Why!? People normally aren't this stupid without having been constantly manipulated over time.
There's way more evidence Mikey Johnson has a GRINDR profile than there is of California election fraud.
Johnson's arguments are so bad he doesn't even make any. Every single right wing stooge at the top understands the demographics of vote by mail, we've just normalized treason and lying. SCOTUS is the only legislator they need.
Keep it up. California is tired of the red state dead weight.
I'm tired, boss
Fucking same.
I mean just insisting without evidence worked during the last election, so why not this one?
Denigrating a nation's democratic electoral institutions without providing proof should be punishable by death.
Pound the sand little man…
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News