258
submitted 2 days ago by Wudi@feddit.uk to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Meta aren't even moderating anymore.

That's why they're getting banned from everywhere

I've reported illegal incitement on numerous occasions and nothing ever gets done. I've reported violent incitement and it is never against community standards

We have gel blaster companies advertising to states in Australia where they are banned and vape companies using meta to push more vaping to kids

Fuck them

[-] Krompus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

TikTok is the same, it's all incompetent mod-bots. I've reported about 100 catfish accounts (impersonating influencers and reuploading their content) and most of them are ignored with "Status: No violations".

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah

The biggest issue isn't even that fb is no longer modding properly.

It's that they're no longer modding properly and shiity ragebait racist contact is being promoted because engagement drives it

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

wtf is a gel blaster, and why would it be banned?

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a play gun that shoots. Basically, it's something that Australias shittiest people use to help normalize guns

We only have 1 state in Australia that allows their sale I think, and meta happily lets them advertise everywhere. They don't care. Sure it's legal for them to do so.

They also happily promote our local right wing racists too, who get a lot of engagement

Even animal cruelty or porn meta cares very little. Lots of hunters with dead animals all over their profile promoting guns all over meta.

I'm not sure 12 year olds should be having that stuff pop up on their news feed. Even less the constant illegal incitements

[-] sunsofold@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Think paintball guns that shoot the absorbent gel balls used to fill vases for cut flowers.

[-] zephiriz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Yet I got a suspension for posting a suggestive photo of the first Tramp. Worth it. Also haven't touched Facebook in over 6 years. His first term.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 188 points 2 days ago

That's how you know it's probably a good idea.

Personally I'd go a step further and regulate algorithmic feeds in general. It's pretty clear at this point that feeding people a steady drip of content picked to maximize "engagement" above all else has done incalculable damage.

[-] SillyDude@lemmy.zip 36 points 2 days ago

One of the biggest things I miss is the old YouTube "algorithm". Before everything was personalized based on your subscriptions and watch history. YouTube was a rabbit hole, the whole site. I miss starting out just watching some random video and then going on the adventure of different videos leading to all sorts of different topics. I've always wondered if there's a site that can return that algorithm, or if I could somehow replicate it.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My hope is that’s what the Fediverse and “old web” becomes someday. A sort of quiet, commercially unviable place where all the internet dwellers have congregated once again. Where all those oldschool data hoarders can share their stuff again.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

It feels quaint compared to hearing tiktok videos, which is my new #1 pet peeve. Just the sound sets me off.

[-] keimevo@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

This. Pre-2010 social media, which basically showed a feed with the posts of the people you followed, had a lot less negative impact on people. The engagement maximization strategy multiplies "negative" news, because outrage apparently engages more than good news. And current algorithmic feeds like TikTok destroy attention span and make people dumber.

And while we're at it, ban (or at least heavily regulate) dating apps, the only business where the companies sell the opposite product of what they supposedly offer. If people find long-term partners through the apps they would stop using them, so the companies are incentivized to help you not find love and real relationships.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

Pre-2010 social media still had issues. It incentivised likes and views, which then social media companies capitalized (literally) and then it became a terrible feedback loop. The desire for likes/views is deeply coded in our psyche and can't change that.

The problem is and has been humans.

[-] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Social media is older than likes and views. Usenet for instance is older than the Web.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] keimevo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

That's why I said less negative impact.

And we can't change human nature, but we can force social media companies to change.

[-] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

The problem is and has been humans.

Well, yeah, but unless you're suggesting we exterminate the species, the answer must be regulating the way we interact with each other, like the person above suggested.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

If I have to hear one more fucking second of some random fuckwit on tiktok, I'm voting for exterminating the species.

[-] Akh@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Exactly. Anything conservatives urge should probably mean doing the opposite

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Ofc the epstein class doesn't want that. They'd lose out on children to victimize.

[-] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Is anyone thinking of the billionaire pedos? No, they're only thinking about themselves.

[-] probable_possum@leminal.space 65 points 2 days ago

There is a reason that gambling is regulated (in some countries). Why not do the same for addictive mechanisms in social media? You wouldn't need to ban social media for children then. 🙄

[-] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

Exactly. Adults can’t handle this trash very well either.

[-] msage@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago

One fucking horse armor at the beginning.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

"How will we be able to groom kids?"

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

Fuck me I hate this so much because the UK just throwing mass surveillance on everything is hardly a win and that is the method they are looking at.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

Whitehouse can fuck off

[-] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Social media is the new religion. Start em young and get the hooked!

[-] Bruncvik@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Belfast is currently burning in many places. Loads of the rioters are young lads in their teens. While the word of mouth played some role, the bulk of the blame for facilitating the organisation of these riots falls onto social media. This is not the first time, not will it be the last time unless social media is available only to people old enough to have some common sense.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 48 points 2 days ago

i'm with donny boy here. instead of limiting what people can do, push regulation that forbid corporations from building the kind of software that is bad for your mental health. ban infinite scrolling features, algorithmic feeds, and dark patterns. make the fines equal or higher than gdpr because now it's about people's actual health.

...that's what they want instead, right?

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

It is already against the law for them to keep data and market to children under 13 and they are supposed to get parents permission over 13. How quaint that you think that they would follow laws.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] underThunder@thelemmy.club 24 points 2 days ago

I bet the real reason they're taking this position is because then the under 16s couldn't be manipulated through social media. They'd lose a valuable target of propaganda.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It would be great to clip those over 78 from social media, too.

Send Nana some actual photos.

My grandpa’s in his 90s and he never touched a computer. Whenever we’ve got photos we want to send to him. We have to print them out at Walgreens and then mail them to him. Lol

[-] Miller@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Careful now your true motivations are showing.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago

They don’t care

[-] eleijeep@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Because that's how the tech bros get new talent for their deranged orange leader. /s

[-] MrNesser@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

How will we brain wash them with US propaganda if you ban it!!!!

Think of th children

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 10 points 2 days ago

“American companies need access to all those impressionable, developing minds.”

[-] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

It’s algorithmic, targeted advertising that’s the real problem.

IMO, the same advert should be shown to all users (at least per country) so that targeting political bullshitting / “advertising” can be knocked on the head, as well as the adverts logged in a public system so they can be reviewed and the funder identified.

[-] eleijeep@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

I would absolutely support a law to ban targeted advertising. Contextual advertising (based only on the content being viewed) is the only ethical form of advertising (if that's not an oxymoron), and the surveillance apparatus built to enable targeted advertising is going to be remembered as one of the biggest mistakes in human history - if we ever manage to move past it.

[-] modernangel@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

if this regime is urging your country not to do something, they're probably planning an exploit

[-] AuroraZzz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

How are the Christians gonna groom them if they get too old?

[-] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Oh, I'm sure its only because they are worried about online privacy and digital freedom.

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Of course, how else will the pedos find and abduct the kids. Social media makes their job easier.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
258 points (100.0% liked)

World News

56496 readers
2252 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS