This seems to be more about where a person is searching for the knowledge they need to improve the human condition. In the case of both the believers and the sceptics, the answer is external. Not just external to themselves, but external to humanity. For the believers, it's the divine. For the sceptics, science. It appears that Tolstoy would rather they seek knowledge from humanity itself, and to apply that knowledge directly for the improvement of the human condition. A more introspective, human focused approach.
4
Yeah, had a similar discussion some days ago . I must say though that in the current atmosphere of propaganda and disinformation this discussion becomes more acid. It all does come down a gliding scale between differences in objective quantifable reality (positivism) and subjective cultural ( or hermeunitical) values, and how you as a scientist use this information. Thus, what is your ideological intent? Is it value free science or is it an instrument for (political monetary) power?
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
4 points (100.0% liked)
Philosophy
1858 readers
5 users here now
Discussion of philosophy
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS