199

Busting the myth of the "scofflaw cyclist" Danish Road Directorate studies reveal that while 66% of motorists routinely break road traffic laws only 5% of cyclists do so. Law breaking by cyclists is higher where there is no cycle-specific infrastructure.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

When they do break a law it almost never results in someone else's death.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago

Fuck the premise that bikes should follow the same laws as cars.

Keep yourself safe and alive. Fuck the law.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 12 points 1 day ago

Interesting. Now check how many motorists are killed by cyclists and vice versa.

[-] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

To get at what really matters, you have to multiply the infractions times the danger each one poses to others.

[-] homes@piefed.world 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

“Thing everyone has known for decades is now officially documented, yet will continue to be ignored.”

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

New study is cool, but old studies in the US have found this to be true as well.

[-] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 2 days ago

Do you know which studies?

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No but they were in NYC, because I remember reading about this on StreetsBlog NYC like ten years ago. Sorry, would have linked them if I had them on hand.

[-] Perky@fedia.io 22 points 2 days ago

People like to think that bicyclists are breaking laws all the time because they assume that bicycles must be treated as either cars or pedestrians. They are, in fact, a secret third thing with their own set of laws. Motorists don't know those laws because they have no reason to look them up. It's easier to just assume that the bicycle on the road/on the sidewalk/not stopping for the stop sign must be breaking the law because it would be illegal for a car to do it.

[-] ergonomic_importer@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago

they assume that bicycles must be treated as cars

Thank John Forester for that one

[-] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Cyclists go through red lights when it makes sense. Who wants to wait for dumb traffic signals when the road is empty and the infrastructure been built to protect pedestrians from cars (and cars from cars).

If a cyclist goes through a red light, the cyclist is dead*. If a car goes through a red light, the cyclist dead.

*yes, technically it could be worse for others too

[-] SCmSTR 5 points 1 day ago

The amount of bikes I see blasting through fully red lights is near 100%

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago

The amount of bullshit I hear from the internet...

[-] Sirius006@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

Did you read the article? Are there bike infrastructure there? Are they "blasting through the red light" or crossing at the safest time, which does not happen to be when the light is green because of the way the infrastructures are?

[-] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

I live in a city which almost completely covered with cycling infrastructure.

When weather is good I bike to work. I see cyclers running on red light almost every time. Few times saw them driving against the flow. Some weirdos would ride on the road when a perfectly safe bike line is on the sidewalk.

To be fair, I also see many cars running red light right after traffic light switched to it.

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

To be fair, I also see many cars…

Yes, exactly the point of the article.

[-] Sirius006@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I'm not saying cyclists do not break the law, they do, like everybody. The points are :

  • they are not worst than other users, and are in fact better (see the other studies on that subject, including the one cited above),
  • when they do they are not putting the others in excessive danger like motorized vehicles,
  • the rules where created without them in mind, so it would actually make sense that they break the law more often to stay safe. Still, they don't.

Unfortunately all the studies I've heard about on this matter are from northern Europe, but I doubt it's different elsewhere.

[-] mech@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Now count the number of car drivers who stay under the posted speed limit, keep a safe following distance, respect the right of way of pedestrians and cyclists, and indicate before every turn. (You'll be waiting a while to find a single one)

[-] dan69@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

An easy is not texting for doom scrolling while driving.

[-] CombatWombat@feddit.online 16 points 2 days ago

Precisely:

This was backed up by traffic officer PC Mark Hodson of West Midlands police who said that the “effects of behavior that people are moaning about is negligible. If you look at the statistics, if you look at the actual threat of harm, cyclists aren’t posing a risk to anybody.”

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I almost never see cyclists adhere to Stop signs in my area. Bicycles are vehicles and need to follow the postage signage too.

[-] bassad@jlai.lu 7 points 1 day ago

Have you paid attention to drivers then?

The study is not saying that cyclist respect all signage, it says that car drivers break FAR MORE rules.

[-] teft@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

Stop signs are the most dangerous place for a cyclist to stop. The only place more deadly is a shared bike lane where you can get doored. Safety stops are the only way for a cyclist to deal with a stop sign.

[-] CombatWombat@feddit.online 25 points 2 days ago

Bicycles are allowed to treat stop signs as yield signs in many areas; it may be worth checking to see if you live in one of them. But rest assured! Statistically, for every one of those you see, there are hundreds more cars violating traffic laws.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

out on a bike you see much easier than when you're sitting in a box on wheels.

when i'm driving i don't even consider "not adhering to Stop signs", when i'm on a bike slowing down is enough to look and consider stopping or continuing

i should also remind that bikes do not weigh a ton and don't kill a million people every year

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Bicycles are vehicles and need to follow the postage signage too.

I'm not dying because you lick boots. Grow up and get a clue.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Cool. So there's this intersection near my house where there's a right-turn slip lane onto a 3-lane stroad. Used to be, it'd have a green arrow at the same time as the opposite direction had green and left-turn green arrow. It saved time by shortening the light cycle. Drivers are supposed to make a turn into the nearest lane of the street they're entering, so you'd think that two cars could enter three lanes simultaneously, but nope. Too many conflicts with left-turning drivers crossing all three lanes into the far lane that the right-turning drivers were also entering.

So the city changed the light timing.

But, fuck, man, drivers think their shit don't stink because they don't even bother to learn all of the laws they're violating.

(P.S. They also roll through most stop signs.)

[-] mellowistheyellow@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Bicycles are literally allowed to yield. See - the law.

[-] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

State specific, or is this a federal thing? Or not even a US thing?

[-] mellowistheyellow@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

State, Idaho Stop and Delaware Yield. Where i live its Delaware Yield - all bikes yield at stop signs.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

There are no laws for bikes anywhere. It's all madeup bullshit and whether the cops want to harass people.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
199 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15882 readers
759 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS