395
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

all the doubting here makes me think that if james wins that cons party will have a meltdown

That’s why I want him to win, I want him to win to own the chudservatives

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

fuck off with this maybe could be shit.

I'm convinced this kind of coverage is engineered for no purpose than to make people go "Well, it looks like a shoe in, so I dont have to go deal with the crowds" and next thing you know republican has won by 30%

[-] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh yeah, that's why a republican wins texas by 30% in a midterm. lol

[-] BonkTheAnnoyed@piefed.blahaj.zone 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

All the people in here commenting, like "oh no, there's a hope! Step on it!"

Wouldn't want people to actually get fired up and vote, now would we?

[-] Spooge@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

This is Lemmy. It's terminally online doomers and pompous Linux dweebs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KC_Royalz@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Ive been hearing this since Bush and it hasn't once been close. So much like my football team, I'll believe when I actually see some results

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

It's really funny as an outsider. It's been decades of "Texas is going to go blue" lol

[-] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, as in “blue balls.” All this edging, smh

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

Don't expect much from the cowboys until Jerry kicks the bucket.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 43 points 4 days ago

Doubt it, I'm not convinced Texas has three brain cells to share amongst themselves. They've had stronger candidates than Talarico in the past and still re-elected Cancun Cruz.

[-] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago
[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

As a Californian who's only ever used paper ballots this confuses and disgusts me. I wish to do a march to the sea.

[-] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

I first started complaining about this back in 2000, when it was said that all you needed to shift an election was 5 minutes alone with one of these machines and a USB drive. Of course everybody was calling me paranoid. You don't even need a USB drive now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Beto had a decent chance until he said he was coming for the AR-15s. I mean at least let your opponents say that, don't feed them the sound byte.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"I'd rather vote for a guy who skips a tenth of his votes, hikes the electric bill, and tried to overthrow a presidential election before I'd give up weapons used (repeatedly) to slaughter school children"

Mhmm yep. Very normal society.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

Timing also matters. When things are shitty people want change.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Things being shitty is not a new phenomenon. This state is a petri dish example of 30+ years of gop policies and mistakes. All that time, and the state literally re-elected the pos that went for vacation while their neighbors froze to death. I hope to see change but texas is entirely "wish I knew how to quit you" with them.

Texas is like ground zero for voter disenfranchisement though. They do it better than anyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] protist@retrofed.com 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A lot of shitting on the possibility here. People have a right to be skeptical, but it's also hard to overstate how many moderate Republicans Ken Paxton has already alienated in Texas. Paxton has impeached by the Republican-led Texas House for his criminal activity. There are large swathes of suburban voters who may typically vote Republican but who would skip right over Paxton on that ballot.

At the same time, Talarico's ability to speak confidently and comfortably about religion and in churches is giving him a huge leg-up in making inroads with those same disaffected suburbanites.

The calculus is not the same as it was with Cruz vs O'Rourke in 2018. Talarico's prospects today are solidly better than O'Rourke's were at any point during his campaign.

[-] ClownStatue@piefed.social 10 points 3 days ago

I always felt like O’Rourke was mostly propped up by the party. I never really thought he had a serious shot at winning a statewide election.

Talarico is a genuine Christian. Try as they might, the Christian-ist Christians of Christian-By-God-Texas can’t make a dent in his actual real Christian love, and members of their flocks are noticing that. I see countless posts saying Jesus was a progressive, but precious few politicians that embody that. I hope he does well. That said, this is Texas. They may hate Paxton, but to they hate him enough to vote for gulp A DEMOCRAT!?

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 10 points 3 days ago

Beto was doing great, right up until he went on a big Texas radio show and announced intended to take away their guns. You could almost hear the air hissing out of the balloon.

He lost by a tiny margin. I strongly believe that dumb statement cost him the seat. If he had taken Cruz's seat, and Talarico took Cornyn's seat, we'd have two Dem senators from Texas.

But Beto couldn't keep his mouth shut about guns in Texas.

[-] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

In true democrat fashion, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

[-] ClownStatue@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

I didn’t hear about the radio show, but I recall him saying it during, I think, the Democratic Presidential Debate in 2016?

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 5 points 3 days ago

There was one particular radio appearance that he was particular enthusiastic and confrontational, like he could get. That kind of attitude was taking him far, until he applied it to guns. In Texas.

Previous Dems had lost by double digits, but Beto got within a couple of percentage points. It seems onvious that gun statement made the difference.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

It was over when he said hell yah he would take their ARs.

[-] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

A lot of shitting on the possibility here.

For good reason, this claim is made constantly.

[-] protist@retrofed.com 13 points 3 days ago

I wrote more beyond those first 8 words

[-] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, providing nothing that could convince a realistic person that Texas is "blue".

[-] Spooge@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Don't underestimate how stupid Republican voters are either.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago

I’ll believe it when I see it. You can serve filet mignon and Texans will still vote for feces on a platter. Example: Ted Cruz.

🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🎉🎊🎊

[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Is he a liberal or progressive?

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

I want to believe eapecially since Paxton may be the worst fucking candidate ever.

However i think even assuming Talarico wins Hot Wheels will find a way to claim the election is rife with fraud and appoint Paxton anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago

Wouldn't it be purple, at best? Flipping one Senate seat in a red state isn't going to make the whole place blue.

[-] platypode@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago

For sure, but even making Texas remotely competitive would be a huge blow—it’s a large state that takes a lot of money to reach with political advertising, and if republicans have to start campaigning hard to keep their bedrock state then that time and money drain can start dragging other races.

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Don't give me hope... Just, don't. 😕

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

I'm at least semi-optimistic because they've known he was the nominee for over a month yet their best insults are calling him "Talifreako" and a "Vaygun". 🤔

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

The only thing Texas has ever turned blue:

[-] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Might want to read up on Ann Richards, for one.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

c/ballbusting

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
395 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30003 readers
2161 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS