26

Looking to leave GMAIL and am currently testing Proton for a $1 a month. So far it's pretty good and the issue I have is not with Proton, but with who I'm sending messages to. If I send an email to a gmail account my information is still sitting on a Google server. So is Proton worth it? Is something like Fastmail just as good over all due to how email works? With Fastmail I can get email for my whole family for $14 a month. I won't have the VPN, ProtonPASS and other Proton apps, but are they worth the $12 a month for one person?

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ropatrick@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

If you are concerned about your information getting on a Google server when you send an Email to a Gmail account, is the issue still the same no matter what provider you use? Or am I misunderatanding? You are still to a Gmail address no?

[-] paranoidandroid42@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

No you're understanding me. It's impossible to avoid Google as over almost everyone uses them. My thought really is if it's worth even trying. I can use a better service, but Google will still get my emails as most of my circle uses Google.

[-] ropatrick@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Do you know what personal info gets landed on their server when you send an Email to a Gmail account? Presumably Email address and name, but is there much more, hidden stuff?

I never actually thought about it from this angle. Moreso about how much they have access to by having a Google account, but not the exposure if yiu Email someone on their servers.

[-] dieTasse@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I think its worth it. And even if there are people on google, the more people join privacy-friendly providers the less the issue happens. After I joined proton half of my family or friends joined too. Its a long game but worth it. Also I prefer Proton over tuta because tuta developed their own encryption while Proton uses PGP which is more universal.

[-] formlessoedon@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago

I like Tuta more than Proton since they don't try to get more info. But really you want to hook all the Tuta accounts up to Murena emails (they actually work with apps etc unlike Tuta & Proton etc) then add those to Addy.io, Firefox Relay, and Simplelogin. Bam infinity emails, they're all searchable and you can archive them offline (since you're using Arcane Chat or K-9 Mail or whatever)

I'm not paying for a service people force me to use lmao

[-] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

I think you should at least donate if you can. It's not about whether you are forced to use it, but whether you appreciated the service (which you probably did if you used it over all the other services available). If the service goes away due to lack of funding, you're still forced to use email, but you'll just be forced to use a worse email service.

[-] formlessoedon@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I'm not falling for the old smol bean give me donations trick from large nonprofits supported by shit like the Open Technology Fund of the OSS. I have actual developers to support, after the genocide most of the countries they live in are committing is dealt with (https://lifeline4gaza.com/). I have more local providers but they don't always play nice abroad.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago

I'm happy with Fastmail, no idea about Proton, but the Proton CEO's antics are a bit too tech-bro for me.

[-] onlooker9496@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Also happy with my move to Fastmail. I have no preconceptions about the security of email and am leery of Proton's all eggs in one basket strategy

[-] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 21 hours ago

Not sure if this helps you, but here's my experience with email providers.

After leaving gmail, I went to proton, was a paid user of proton for 2 years. I left it for a few reasons, the major one was lack of linux support in their services, like no drive app, late updates, even in VPN app. Some other small reasons were that it didn't allow many custom domains, harder/complicated SMTP, since I like using Thunderbird. Later, I felt I am paying too much since I don't need a lot of these services.

Now, I am using mailbox.org with a €3 plan. I manage my own encryption keys. This means I cannot use the webUI, and I can only access my email on devices where those keys are stored. For my use case, this is really good. I can get so many aliases, I can connect so many custom domains. Considering it just as an email service, it is a lot cheaper than others.

[-] chrand@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

+1 for mailbox.org so far so good, managing own encryption key is a plus

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

+1 for mailbox.org

[-] twoBrokenThumbs@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Yes the shortcoming is always with the weakest link.

But most of my mail is inbound, so I have control over that. Plus I created sieve filters to automatically tag and organize my mail, including deletion of unimportant stuff like newsletters. Top that with a personal domain and I have everything how I like it.

Anecdotally, in the many years I've been with Proton I've gotten maybe 2 or 3 spam emails, and they went to the spam folder.

[-] lemming@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

For me, the main reason for the switch was to get my own domain. It's surprisingly easy. This way, if I start to dislike the service handling my emails, I can easily switch it without changing my email address. Leaving gmail and getting somewhat more privacy is nice, but getting control was the main reason.

[-] StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today 3 points 22 hours ago

You've struck the core of why privacy oriented emails don't do much

[-] dieTasse@feddit.org 3 points 13 hours ago

But they do. And the more people join the better collective privacy.

[-] thomasshikari@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

For me, yeah, it sucks knowing if you send an email to a gmail user then your message is in google still. But, I take comfort in knowing I’m not signing into or using google myself. Just be aware your emails aren’t protected at all. I agree with the other commenter - use whatever is convenient. Emails are never a very private communication form, either way. I also use proton but have been a bit conflicted since they continue pushing AI integration and I’m not pleased knowing my money is helping fund that for them.

[-] tekato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

If I send an email to a gmail account my information is still sitting on a Google server. So is Proton worth it?

Due to the nature of email, assume privacy is impossible and just use whatever is easiest (yea, Gmail). Like you mentioned, the message will be in their servers anyways. That is, unless you explicitly only email other Proton users.

[-] jello@programming.dev 6 points 23 hours ago

I think this is a poor mentality. You're essentially giving in and increasing Google's network effect, making privacy harder for everyone. Choosing to use a more private service where possible will shift the power slowly, and there's really no downside with email. You can do this with a free tier, no money required until it's worth it for yourself.

[-] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, email isn't private, but for me it's usually that I don't like my host reading all of my mail to build an profile on me and selling that data. Individual emails in isolation aren't a big deal, but seeing every email and what company or agency sent it is as problematic as the content even if you encrypt the mail content itself. Emails that I sends I always assume are not private, but that's a separate issue, IMHO. There's a lot of private information like what protected classes I am part of, political leanings, places I shop, etc., that can be gathered simply from who sends mail to you and who you send mail to. This is why I self host for most of my email.

That being said I still use gmail as I need a backup option and I use it for things where I don't want the junk sender to know my domain and spam all of my accounts.

But Proton is really not much more private than Google in several scenarios given their CEO's stance on several sensitive subjects and willingness to give data on protected classes, journalists, etc., to hostile governments, as an example. They do say they don't sell your data to ad companies, at least. I don't know Fastmail at all. And self-hosting is not something I'd recommend if you don't want to put a lot of time and effort into it. Lots of issues come up like blacklisted VPS IP addresses in addition to the setup itself.

[-] paranoidandroid42@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

It's almost like we should not expect privacy. Tuta looks interesting, but again it's the lock in and they use their own proprietary encryption

[-] uninvitedguest@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I originally started with Tuta and I found it too frustrating to use. The UI is lacking, notifications wouldn't come in for extended periods (as it doesn't use play services), and frequently, when opening the application, it would tell me I'm offline and disconnected and take a considerable time before eventually refreshing itself and showing me the contents of my inbox.

I went on the hunt trialling alternatives, including Purely mail, Infomaniak and Mailbox.org, but ultimately landed on Fastmail despite it being a more costly option.

Fastmail is just slick in its offering. I'm a heavy label user and the UI and UX just works for me. The ease of creating masked emails has me using that feature more than I ever thought I would.

It can still work on an IMAP connection but gives you the usual label to folder oddities, but I'm fine with their app offerings on Android/iOS/Linux/Windows.

The downsides are its cost and being hosted in a five-eyes country.

[-] warm@kbin.earth 5 points 1 day ago

You dont know how the sender or recipient handles your mail, but handling your own with encryption is still a good practice.

An email provider can have an entire database of all your emails (e.g. Google with Gmail), which more valuable than individual people or companies having access to only a few related ones.

There's also PGP support with some providers, so you could set-up encrypted emailing with people if that's important to you.

Either way, getting away from the big providers is a good move, I'd at least want my inbox encrypted though, like Proton or others do.

Fully encrypted email should have been made standard a long time ago.

[-] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

It's not how they handle the email that worries me. It's how they handle the one time pad that does. They'd better be ready to eat that thing if they can't burn it.

[-] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

i have switched to another provider and tell people how good an experience it has been. a few have switched, so my emails with them are not on Google.

also gmail is slow as hell

[-] tracyspcy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

There is also a tutanota mail, worth to consider as well.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You could use pgp or s/mime.

You could email a link to a discussion that’s hosted elsewhere.

[-] paranoidandroid42@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I'd love if people in my circles would get onboard with privacy and do that. I tried getting family on Signal and no one seemed to care about their privacy. I could see people simply not joining the discussion due to friction.

[-] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago

Proton is arguably the best option if you're trying not to rely on Google, and they are slowly building a suite of apps with the goal of directly competing with Google Drive, Calendar, Sheets, etc.

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I did it that last month, not because I have any expectations of privacy (I wish we could move away from emails entirely), but because I don't want to be so much at the mercy of what google decides, especially with their recent push on id verification left and right, and ties to this dystopian government. I'm gradually moving away from other of their products too.

If I was browsing options today, I'd also look into calendar and contact management / importing. Proton makes it easy to import existing calendars and they are kept in sync. They're still improving the calendar features though, so maybe you'll miss a thing or two there. Contacts are also easy to import, but there's no feature to keep them in sync with what google has, if you need a transition period. There is a merging/deduplication feature though.

And if you're using google workspaces, I couldn't figure out how to send an email from proton using the work domain, so that's something I still need to use the gmail web client or e.g. thunderbird.

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
26 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

48895 readers
662 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS