99

Gabbard advised Trump of her intention to ​step down during an Oval Office meeting on Friday, ​Fox News Digital reported earlier. The resignation is effective June ⁠30, it said.

A source familiar with the matter said that ​Gabbard had been forced out by the White House.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 7 points 1 hour ago
  • Ran a vicious disingenuous dirty Democratic primary as a self-proclaimed left-wing "dove" who wanted nothing more to "end the endless wars".
  • Joined the cabinet of a fascist far-right Trump administration, only to preside over a racism domestic terrorism campaign in blue cities while starting a brand new forever war in Iran.

I can't exactly say I'm surprised and disappointed in Gabbard's political legacy here--I always new she was a snake and a puppet designed to rile up low information voters on our side. But what truly disappoints me is just how many fucking people fell for it over and over again.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

I feel bad for her husband. Bone cancer, and now she's gonna be around him all the time.

[-] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Russia got everything they needed, I guess.

[-] Nautalax@lemmy.world 39 points 4 hours ago

I’d say good riddance but who knows what sort of creep they’ll put in there. That said, this lives in my brain whenever I hear her name, as does that they had to cover Caesar’s face so she wouldn’t leak his identity:

In the summer of 2015, three Syrian girls who had narrowly survived an airstrike some weeks earlier stood before Tulsi Gabbard with horrific burns all over their bodies.

Gabbard, then a US congresswoman on a visit to the Syria-Turkey border as part of her duties for the foreign affairs committee, had a question for them.

“How do you know it was Bashar al-Assad or Russia that bombed you, and not Isis?’” she asked, according to Mouaz Moustafa, a Syrian activist who was translating her conversation with the girls.

It was a revealing insight into Gabbard’s conspiratorial views of the conflict, and it shocked Moustafa to silence. He knew, as even the young children did, that Isis did not have jets to launch airstrikes. It was such an absurd question that he chose not to translate it because he didn’t want to upset the girls, the eldest of whom was 12.

“From that point on, I’m sorry to say I was inaccurate in my translations of anything she said,” Moustafa told The Independent. “It was more like: How do I get these girls away from this devil?”

The like one good idea she had is that she opposed war with Iran but her voice clearly lost out against the likes of Bibi and Lindsey Graham.

[-] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 2 points 1 hour ago

I don't believe for a second that she opposed the war with Iran. That's her message.

If she really did feel strongly about it (and she should, because ending the "forever wars" was her #1 campaign issue back in 2016), then she would have resigned before the war was started.

The lady is, and always has been, a total fraud.

[-] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Any woman who would agree to work for a human shit-stain like Drumpf gets what she deserves. Like when Katelyn Jenner tried to run as a ^^^rethuglican^^^.

[-] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 20 points 4 hours ago
[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 hours ago

Emerging reports about a new sign installed at the whitehouse

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 hours ago

Is this a club for women haters of He Man, or haters of He Man Women?

[-] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago
[-] BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Or what she didn't do

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago

Convenient scapegoats so the admin media puppets can blame the past two years of failures on women

[-] Juan_de_Silentio@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

No big surprise that women don't last in MAGA world. I wonder how long Erika Kirk can hang on?

[-] artyom@piefed.social 13 points 4 hours ago

And another person in Trump's cabinet learns that even if you are 1000% loyal to Trump, he has loyalty to no one.

[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

A win is a win. Adios. Not soon enough.

this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
99 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29851 readers
3066 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS