37
submitted 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) by antonim@lemmy.world to c/wikipedia@lemmy.world

Since 2016โ€“2019, aggregate monthly pageviews of Wikipedia's "Vital Articles" are down โˆ’26% across eight major languages I sampled (en, es, fr, de, it, pt, ja, ar). The Vital Articles are an imperfect set, but they cover a much broader set of topics than my last sample set, and are widely replicated across wikis. (All of these wikis have at least 80% of the articles, making it more apples-to-apples.)

The decline isn't even across topics. Mathematics, physical sciences, and technology are down 43% to 85%; biographical articles and geography are down less than 10% in half the languages I looked at. The per-topic ordering (which have declined the most or the least) is nearly identical in every one of the eight languages.

Freshness of article content matters, but not as strongly as topic.

โ€“ Luis Villa

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TehBamski@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago
[-] antonim@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I believe most articles across different language Wikipedias are not translations but written independently from the existing ones.

[-] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 7 points 15 hours ago

Yes. Notably, the english version of wikipedia has a page of a list of bread.

The french version of wikipedia does not have that page. Further, many things are classified as bread in the english version of wikipedia, but as pastries in the french version.

I remember having an argument about this and I cited the english pages, and then they pulled up the french page and translated it for me. Lmao.

[-] antonim@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, the different versions don't have to be synchronised, and the standards for sources differ (outside of the big European languages, the standards are much lower and there's much more bullshit out there), and simply you can have one editor doing things the way they prefer on one wiki, an another editor with their preferences on the other one. Some of that can be a result of different local cultures or academic traditions (different terminology, different systems of classification, etc.).

Btw there's currently a project that's supposed to solve this, "Abstract Wikipedia", the idea being that you enter information that's language-independent and that can be converted into any individual language.

(It's really bad and won't work out.)

this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
37 points (100.0% liked)

Wikipedia

4965 readers
128 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS