The human eye can only see 999 FPS /s
Frames per second per sarcasm?
Yeah, it's the rolling of the eyes that really limits it.
no clue.. I have 144 and usually don't even have it enabled.
meanwhile i got my first 165hz monitor and now i get all snooty when games are capped at 60
"full 1080p" - Big whoop, that's rookie numbers of pixels
Low Perceived motion blur looks amazing. I only seen 165hz and I can imagine how much better that would look (when or if we uncouple framerate from performance like i heard from Intel gpu guy)
when or if we uncouple framerate from performance like i heard from Intel gpu guy
Was he talking about frame generation? Otherwise I don’t really see how that’s supposed to happen.
That is one they used as example but there's other things people been trying (with different pros and cons). I remember one where it just kept the old frames as needed but that causes a lot of weirdness but it felt really smooth.
All things related to monitor hardware; desktop monitors, portable monitors, projectors, monitor technology and monitor business news.
Other hardware communities across Threadi:
Rules (Click to Expand):
Follow the Piefed.social rules: https://piefed.social/rules
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
No spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
Please stay on topic, topics adjacent to monitor hardware are fine.
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Icon by "Bartama Graphic"