512

I understand the intent, but feel that there are so many other loopholes that put much worse weapons on the street than a printer. Besides, my prints can barely sustain normal use, much less a bullet being fired from them. I would think that this is more of a risk to the person holding the gun than who it's pointing at.

(page 3) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Who pays for the background check? If it's the individual, this would kill 3d printing in New York. If someone else, it would still probably kill 3d printing just because of the extra resistance to purchase.

[-] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Shhhh dont tell new york that anybody can by a lathe or a mill. Or forbid A CNC

Requiring a backround check for a 3d printer is idiotic at best. Whats next a flat bastard file? You could use it to form metal to make weapons! Not to deburr or make somthing harmless.

THINK OF THE CHILDREN

[-] goddog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, USA... The land of the free XD

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
512 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

15688 readers
315 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS