74
AI vigilante trap snares alleged paedophile ex-teacher in France (www.bbc.com)
submitted 4 days ago by sidefaceturdtalker@leminal.space to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sidefaceturdtalker@leminal.space 27 points 4 days ago

So just let me hand over my autonomy over to the capitalist pdfiles so they can go and entrap sick low level players so we can maintain the perception of improvement. If we had better things to do we wouldn't be fucking around. L00ps, p00ps and dupes. Like we are committing a genocide but at least you captured the rapist pervert. Like a tooth pick in a volcano... marginal gains.. inconsequential metrics to put on a show for grandma. phuck your chat g!p!ty beach... I want trees, clean water and sheet. What a dumb a$$ future

[-] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

“Low level pedophiles”? uh… fuck em all of every “level” as if the victims of “low level pedophiles” are less victimized or something? Pedophiles are like Nazis in the sense that every single one needs a boot on their throat, I don’t care what their rank is.

I have zero problem catfishing pedophiles and I think it’s bizarre anyone else would

[-] sidefaceturdtalker@leminal.space 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

ok reading comprehension bub... they selling you the idea of catching pervets while you give up you freedoms. This is a magga freezone. we criticaly think in hur. It is like "what if I promise we catch all the perverts but first we have to cut off your legs and you get no medical insurance." You all are nazis anyways... inoccent people die on death row and that was before chat gippity.

[-] november@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 days ago

the capitalist pdfiles

You can say the word pedophile here.

[-] sidefaceturdtalker@leminal.space 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah but it ended up being a useful shorthand I like "PDFile" cause it also blends in the main problem BIG TECH

[-] Leg@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

This shorthand ruined my job for me. Can't open a .pdf without thinking about terrible things happening to children. I don't understand how everyone is just okay obsessing over this shit when all it gets you is angry.

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Because more people need to get more angry before anything happens.

[-] Leg@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Plenty of people are angry. Anger is not the thing we're lacking. I don't want to think about pedophiles while I work. They're gonna keep existing whether or not I get mad at em while I try to read a document.

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

So, I want you to get up now. I want all of you to get up out of your chairs. I want you to get up right now and go to the window. Open it, and stick your head out, and yell:

“I’m as mad as hell, and I’m going to continue to take more because it’s distracting me at work.”

[-] Leg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

My man, I just don't want pedophiles needlessly occupying my attention. Shit doesn't even affect me. I have no kids. I know no kids. I'm just a grumpy old man shouting at clouds if I decide to be angry all fuckin day. You go be the change you wanna see in the world.

[-] sidefaceturdtalker@leminal.space 3 points 3 days ago

it is not about you player. I hope you never forget you are dominated by a class of people who put their dirty dicks into children. That retirement will get snatched by ol gipity.... it is all connected. You are dominated old man

[-] Leg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

What makes you different?

[-] sidefaceturdtalker@leminal.space 2 points 3 days ago

When the bread gets short thats when you will see change.

[-] sidefaceturdtalker@leminal.space 2 points 3 days ago

L33+ 4 FUN

[-] november@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Pedos aren't "fun", what's wrong with you?

[-] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Habit's forces, we all were once at the pdfiles space.

[-] meowmeow@quokk.au 6 points 4 days ago

If you need sheets, and you don’t have them… I’ll buy you sheets.

[-] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

The state prosecutor in Vesoul said he faced charges of making sexual advances to a person of under 15 years of age, and of soliciting an image of a minor for pornographic purposes.

So, while I get that this man could be dangerous and needs help... How exactly can you charge someone with propositioning a 21 year old who was pretending to be a 14 year old?

[-] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

If he believed the person was under 18 I don’t see the difference, he understood it was immoral and illegal, why it was illegal and chose to do it anyway. If it was an undercover cop posing as a child it would be just as illegal

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"I understood they were 21. The fact that they were an adult roleplaying as a child was understood by both parties, and it was obvious, given the wording they used. Roleplaying is quite common on dating apps. Roleplaying as a different age is so common it even has a name, age-play. When I messaged the other party, I thought I was pursuing an age-play dynamic with a consenting adult."

[-] ZDL@lazysoci.al 3 points 2 days ago

Spotted the person rehearsing for his own court case.

Here's a little problem, however: the courts aren't stupid.

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 4 points 1 day ago

Good thing you're not on a jury! I've met people who do age play but I haven't myself.

[-] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 day ago

Good thing, yes. Because I'm not stupid either.

I can tell the difference between people doing age play in age play-oriented RP environments and predators hunting for prepubescents on general chat, see. That's absolutely the worst kind of juror for a pædophile.

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Thing is, in a criminal case, the prosecution needs to prove the defendant's guilt, hence they would need to prove that the defendant though they were pursuing somebody underage. How would they go about this?

[-] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 day ago

You have a toddler-level view of how laws work. "But I didn't say to kill them. I said to remove the problem." That, for example, didn't work for the mob, and nor is the shit you're spewing here going to work either.

Again: the courts are not stupid. You're making childish arguments that would embarrass a "Free Man on the Land" with your "I assumed I was role-playing with a 21-year old" nonsense. (Doubly so since this was a video chat and the AI-created girl was not made up to look like a 21-year old play-acting 14.)

Also, please stop acting as an apologist for pædos. It's really kind of gross. (And go ahead and bring in the pædo-evasion: "AKSCHUALLY IT'S EPHEBOPHILIA!)

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 3 points 1 day ago

You just admitted the "girl" was an AI video persona, which is possible to identify with a trained eye. Thus, there was video evidence that the "girl" was being deceptive and all traits they claimed about themselves were suspect. To quote Ready Player One, "she could be a 300-pound dude named Chuck."

The defendant could claim actual 14 year olds would be unable to orchestrate such a setup with AI personas. Thus, it must have been an older person doing it.

[-] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 day ago

Again. Courts are not run by idiots, unlike, apparently, the pædo-apologists. None of that shit is going to fly in court.

Go ahead. Test this. You seem so fucking eager to. Go for it. I'll fingerwave at your sentencing.

[-] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Apparently my comment started a real pedo hysteria thread, simultaneously missing and encapsulating my whole point.

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That, for example, didn’t work for the mob

And yet, it's oddly difficult to convict a mob boss. Only when it was made illegal to be a member of the mob in the first place (RICO-act) was the US able to meaningfully push back the American mafia. Seems like it works to me.

(Doubly so since this was a video chat and the AI-created girl was not made up to look like a 21-year old play-acting 14.)

That is indeed a piece of evidence the prosecution could use to successfully get a conviction, because it disproves the assertion that the person thought they were chatting with an adult. Why didn't you bring this up earlier? You'd make a terrible lawyer. And the fact that you bring it up as an afterthought shows that you don't think of it is important. It's almost like you care more about what the person has been accused of, rather than whether they actually did it.

Also, please stop acting as an apologist for pædos. It’s really kind of gross. (And go ahead and bring in the pædo-evasion: "AKSCHUALLY IT’S EPHEBOPHILIA!)

I'm defending the god given right of every man to a fair trial, whatever they may be accused of. Your belief that basic rights go out the window once the crime somebody is accused is significantly heinous enough is antithetical to rule of law and harmful to society as a whole. And, ironically, it makes it easier for real criminals to evade justice by making it easier to convict the innocent.

[-] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 day ago

Why didn't you fucking look at the fucking article that was under fucking review you fucking moron?

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Because Mens rea being provable in this specific case is immaterial as to whether it needs to be proven in order to reach a conviction.

[-] petrol_sniff_king 3 points 3 days ago

Are you asking about how the law would handle it, or morally, how would it be justified? 'Cause I can answer the second one really easily.

this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
74 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7063 readers
1423 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social