1048

I find this move concerning, and wish that the Founder had looked for a new CEO that shared his values rather than a Private Equity and Mergers Expert.

Furthermore, the change to the GRIT motto is worrying. Trust is useless without Transparency when it comes to code and security.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago

I swear, equity is literaly just pure evil, allowed to thrive only due to lack of force opposing it.

[-] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

Self hosting is the new battefront for the individual's right to sovereign data

[-] pwxd@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

Great. Now I have to move all of my password to another services because of a stupid decision made by a company.

[-] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

Great I bought a paid subscription for it all this time for it to end up like this, I'm done with anything that is not self hosted now on, I'll just convert my old laptop into a home server

[-] AvocadoCumToast@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago

This. At this rate everything that has growth and not open source is just a resource to exploit.

[-] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 hours ago

I guess I won't be recommending Botwarden to normies anymore.

[-] John_CalebBradberton@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

How good or bad is a move to Proton Pass?

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The company has long defined its values with the acronym “GRIT,” which used to stand for “Gratitude, Responsibility, Inclusion, and Transparency.” After May 4, it changed the acronym to stand for “Gratitude, Responsibility, Innovation, and Trust.”

It's not as bad as the headline seems. Transparency is still in the motto. The actual change is:

before

after

But still. Why change it at all? Why replace "inclusion" with "innovation"?

It smells like Tech Bro.

There's just no way to spin that positively, even giving them the benefit of the doubt, especially since they aren't rolling it back. Someone spent effort to make that values change, so its not an accident nor a "nothingburger".

[-] u_u@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It's the change from "users" and "community members" to "customers" for me.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

I don't need my password manager to innovate anything. I would very much like it to include support for all of my tools and machines though.

[-] brownsugga@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

Removing 'inclusion' smells like a pivot to the right, same way DEI is a target for maga

[-] Seenitbefore@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Ty. So many comments here didn't see your post and others did but didn't read it. My take is innovation is a greater priority, and trust protocols. I'll watch but I'll wait for it to be a something burger.

[-] Padit@feddit.org 41 points 1 day ago

Well, trust is literally the oposite of transparency. So i would call it quite bad, especially if you consider that right now i trust these guys with my credit card details, my taxID, all my passwords.

[-] gnufuu@infosec.pub 21 points 22 hours ago

Exactly. In cybersec, trust is someting you try to avoid or at least minimize. Trying to use it as a selling point is ridiculous.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 19 hours ago

Or it's something you earn through transparency.

[-] zqps@sh.itjust.works 6 points 14 hours ago

That's what they are trying to communicate here, yes. But 8.5 million users didn't need to be told they need to trust the platform, they chose to. As did I with a premium plan to cover MFA and attachments.

Now with business types in charge and a hidden doubling of the fees, that's more than halfway out the window no matter what the website stands for. I'm guessing somebody decided it's time to cash in on the goodwill they built over the past decade.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's a great point.

I don't want to trust them either. I don't want to have to.

The only "devil's advocate" argument I can think of is they're trying to appeal to enterprise clients (who would not know that and want to "trust" a security company). That would explain the "I" change: "inclusion" (sadly) sounds political, "innovation" is like corporate catnip. Bitwarden could be trying to attract big fish to fund development, having their cake an eating it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 24 points 22 hours ago

I guess it's time to move to vaultwarden sooner rather than later.... This wasn't supposed to be the weekend project, but fuck it; let's roll with it!

[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 10 points 20 hours ago

My question is move to vaultwarden, and trust they will still develop the open source client apps, or just preemptively move to another system. The UX isnt perfect, but it seems a lot easier to use than kerpassxc. Time to do some research.

[-] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

Very easy to migrate to vaultwarden from bitwarden I think, so I'd probably do that and hope the clients are forked if ever needed. I'd probably just live with vaultwardens web ui before swapping completely to keepassxc (because setting up keepass db sync to all devices manually doesn't sound fun).

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 14 hours ago

No personally using KeePass, but I've heard Syncthing is great to sync the database. Might wanna try to look into that.

[-] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Ah for fuck's sake. Seems like every month I have to change something because some fucking company starts getting a taste for greed via data sucking. I'm goddamn sick of it.

[-] kuerbiskernoel@feddit.org 6 points 18 hours ago

That's why you use open source alternatives everywhere :) just replace one at a time when the company fails

[-] Amir@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago

Start using open source then

[-] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

Unprompted snark from an .ml user, how surprising. I am a bigger cheerleader for open source than any of my friends or family. It's the only real path to stay free of corporate influence, greed, and spying (in regards to software). Live free or die.

Bitwarden is, by definition, open source. It has been since I started using it ~6 years ago. I'm tired of literally everything having the potential for enshittification. Nothing is safe in the long run, not even volunteer-run projects. If you think your favorite project is safe because of some "core ethos" or "guiding principles", you're just drinking the kool-aid. As long as we exist under capitalism, anything under the sun can be enshittified.

I will never give up, even if things seem even more dire than they are now. But I'm tired of having to maintain constant vigilance.

[-] zqps@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago

Troll better.

[-] spacehulk@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Enshitification

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 13 points 22 hours ago

why even have "Motto" if you are just going to renege on it.

[-] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

In this case, not having a motto would have made them able to get further down the enshittification path before anyone noticed. They just warned us.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 6 points 20 hours ago

though this also points out why such things as companies having "values" is laughable and should be ridiculed if they arent clearly enforced. All they do is scam people into thinking they might not be explitative shits which shouldnt be allowed or looked kindly upon.

So many people have to switch services now and even more will just become victims of the company after it becomes more shitty. All those people could have used some other service that is less likely to go shitty, which in turn would have given it more resources to improve.

[-] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

If things turn for the worse, hopefully Vaultwarden can fork the client as well

[-] motruck@lemmy.zip 7 points 23 hours ago

This is not great but the strength of vaultwarden on the back of the bitwarden brand will give us forked clients as soon as they stop allowing self-hosters to set their instance.

[-] Tramort@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago

Get out now

Try keepass on self hosted sandstorm

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Update: After publication, an employee on the Bitwarden subreddit said that “Always free” had been restored on its pricing page, calling it an “oversight” by the marketing team. The product page for Bitwarden’s personal password manager remains unchanged.

[-] Bloefz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

We're sorry we got caught

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
1048 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84700 readers
3306 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS