66
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Quokka@quokk.au to c/til@lemmy.ca
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Hildebrandt was sentenced to three years in jail for attempted murder, 10 years for attempting to destroy the aircraft and two years for the explosives charge. He successfully appealed the sentence in the Queensland Criminal Court as he argued that the aircraft which was 35 minutes into the flight, was over New South Wales (NSW) when he armed the explosives in the aircraft toilet. He served a three-year sentence in Brisbane, for attempted murder and on discharge was arrested by detectives from NSW. He faced court again and was convicted on the charge of attempted destruction of an aircraft and sentenced to seven years imprisonment in NSW.

So these were basically all state-level charges, it didn’t trigger a higher national-level charge?

[-] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Something that never made sense to me about 9/11 is how did the hijackers succeed against 200+ people while armed with some box cutters?

[-] PyroNeurosis 2 points 6 days ago

The attitude regarding hijackers was different at the time - most hijackers were there for money or political stunts, often taking planes as they were full of hostages with few exits. Most of the time hijackings were not much worse than a bank robbery: starting trouble would make it worse for everyone and if you just waited it out, the hijackers would be on their way to other mischief.

this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
66 points (100.0% liked)

Today I Learned (TIL)

8983 readers
4 users here now

You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?

/c/til is a community for any true knowledge that you would like to share, regardless of topic or of source.

Share your knowledge and experience!

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS