Where is the source of liability that is making payment processors so adverse to adult content? You're never going to convince me it's a morality thing, they only care about the money. So where is the added risk/cost in processing adult content?
It's pressure from a Christian Fascist Australian group called "Collective Shout". They were the people behind itch.io and Steam being forced to purge things too.
No offense to Australia, but is the Australian market big enough for them to really care?
They're a front group, not the main force
They’re the ones making the push, but the fact is this is the result of payment processor monopolies.
As monopolies they should have the power to say fuck you to fascists.
Maybe they don't have issue with banning it.
Also, while we're here, I'd like to share this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Mountain_Mandate
Oh, and also:
In 2010, Collison co-founded Stripe, which in 2011 received investment of $2 million including from PayPal co-founders Elon Musk and Peter Thiel, and venture capital firms Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, and SV Angel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Collison
It's backed by all the fascists.
Monopolies are inherently intertwined with fascism.
Do you know that for a fact in this case? It was reported on the Valve/Itch thing last year, but that doesn't mean it's them this time.
It's not real pressure, but it's certainly a convenient excuse if you're ideologically aligned with said group anyways.
They're captured by the Christian agenda
You're right,
I mean, don't all those 'pay' adult sites require your credit card subscription?
They don't seem to have a problem processing those?
Wasn't there an issue with pornhub? They were forced to scrub their servers of any unverified content.
Why aren't payment processors required to be neutral like internet providers and telecoms? You just process a payment between two consenting parties for legal goods and services. Why should you get to restrict the types of goods and services that pass through you?
Agree 100%. Payment providers should be classified as common carriers, prohibited from discriminating against any legal business or product.
They own enough politicians to keep any possible change under committee review indefinitely. IF we did pass a law they also own enough judges that it would die in a shadow docket. I love oligarchy, basically anything broken is broken because some rich ass hole is paying for it to be kept that way.
Probably vastages from times where they just started and had to fight regular banking cartels trying to link them to crime, as they themselves do with crypto.
I doubt it. This weird prudishness seems to be new. I can see them being dodgy about processing payments for weed stores as it's still illegal federally. But they're not acting like this has anything to do with the law. Restricting games sales in Steam that includes adult material, and kickstarter contributions for Adult projects had nothing to do with crime. And it's no coincidence that it's happening at the same time that states and some countries are requiring invasive data collection for age verification for visiting adult websites. There is a concerted political right wing effort to push prudish restrictions on everyone by any means possible.
Why the actual fuck are these credit companies allowed so much unbridled power within our society? They can unilaterally exile whole sections of society. Why?
Every time I use my country's own payment processor (Pix), I do so with a smile knowing that VISA/Mastercard wont get a dime
Brazil has a stronger democracy than the USA now
I keep asking why the US doesn't have a federally controlled payment processor. Well, I know why, but one can dream I guess.
If the US had a federally controlled payment processor they'd just end up with Republicans trying to limit what it could be used for. No porn, no abortions, etc.
That would be communism, duh!
Because forcing an industry into the shadows is a great way to kill it and reduce the harm it causes.
/s
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to jerk off to.
Fuck kickstarter
And the payment processors
And the christians forcing their delusional thinking upon the masses.
This is the real problem. The payment processors wouldn't give a shit if it wasn't for a very vocal minority of batshit religious busy-bodies.
Nah, corporate monopolies are the real issue here. If it wasn’t christofascists it’d be a different group targeting something else.
No, corps won't care about this without their sky daddy. https://quokk.au/c/australia/p/909903/the-us-christian-anti-lgbtq-hate-group-involved-in-the-giggle-v-tickle-court-case
We should stop tolerating Christianity is this is how it's gonna behave
Yupp this is the most dangerous.
"Oh no people are starting to think this is all bullshit! What do we do? I know, let's control them that will do the trick!"
Damn, I just backed a project that doesn’t have adult content right now, but conceivably could in the future just because it’s a slice of life comic about adults (also sci fi but that’s irrelevant to the overall point). I wonder how this is going to affect funded but not yet disbursed projects.
Especially since the restrictions are so severe… you can’t do a ton of legitimate art if you can’t show nip or butt.
Time to switch payment providers.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.