I think there will be cases that do not work. For example, default memory access semantics of multi-threaded code are different for x86 compared to ARM - the code likely contains assumptions that are not valid on ARM.
Elevator achieves performance on par with or better than QEMU's user-mode JIT emulation.
QEMU is a weird pick here. Why not FEX?
Why is it "weird"? It has been around much longer AFAIK.
Because fex/box86 have the ability to run arm binaries linked to x86 libraries, netting signficantly greater performance. In addition to other tricks.
https://box86.org/2022/03/box86-box64-vs-qemu-vs-fex-vs-rosetta2/
What's the point of this when you can compile between ISAs using a build tool and source? When would you need to cross compile a binary after building?
Because you don't have the source or because you can't configure the cross-compiler
I guess I'm confused about the context you'd be in that situation.
Easy to explain: The idiot project manager skipped to set up source control, and the sources have been lost.
E.g. when you have a proprietary program that is only available on x86, but you want to run it on ARM.
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
