343
Root cause analysis determined that the reason for the incident was that it was a ship built in Russia.
The front fell off!
Since it's a Russian ship, I'd like to point out that that is very typical.
Is something like that very typical?
Idk for other ships but their aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov became a meme for always being down for maintenance and/or on fire
load more comments
(1 replies)
Those ship attacking killer whales are now a nuclear super power.
The going to add lasers
killer whales with nuclear powered lasers.
Oddly, the bottom of the ocean is a pretty good place to store a nuclear reactor. Which is lucky because Russia already had several of them down there and there are two American nuke subs on permanent patrol.
It's hardly going to be fuelled
Actually the ocean contains billions of tons of uranium
That poor ship fell out a window
Very sad, always from same suite too.
I hope it was Orcas.
The orcas have only been going after small sailboats (the kind small enough for a middle-class family to afford, if they own it instead of a house and live aboard full-time). They aren't the class conscious anti-oligarch crusaders everybody wants them to be.
The phrases "middle class family" and "live aboard full-time" do not sit well with me.
I know a couple who both cashed in all their retirement to buy a boat and sail from place to place; their kids are 'home schooled' on the boat. they are not rich by any stretch, but they're living their dream. not my idea of fun but, eh? the husband now just does odd marine jobs to keep their house floating. I respect their desire to live their way.
A small boat is (well, was, these are probably ~2008 prices I'm remembering) cheap. It's probably been 'patched' by marinas and such, but at one time you could get a small sailboat for 10-20k, and get electricity+dock space for a tenth of the price of an apartment's rent. You would be living in ~200 square feet at best (and probably less than that) but it was doable. For a family of three, you could probably swing that lifestyle with a 40k boat, which is still well under a typical house. Again, it would be ridiculously small, but it's possible. A friend of mine grew up on a sailboat like that.
imagine how impressive the orcas that did this are.
we should give the orcas torpedoes... and a list of targets lol
load more comments
(1 replies)
Let me just leave this here:
South Korea’s ADD showcases new Supercavitating Torpedo at MADEX 2025
ADD said that the development of this supercavitating torpedo is currently about two-thirds complete, and that after further maturing the torpedo’s stabilization control technology, it will finally secure the design and testing technology of the test body.
...The MRXUUV (Mission Reconfigurable eXtra-large Unmanned Underwater Vehicle) currently under development by ADD could serve as testbed.
According to an interview with the ADD chief researcher, the supercavitating torpedo displayed at MADEX 2025 is an actual tested torpedo, designed in size to fit in a UUV, capable of being guided (in the initial phase of the launch, at low speed), and is being developed to sink enemy main surface ships with ultra-high-speed kinetic energy without a warhead.
The publicly released timeline doesn't line up, but the motivations do.
What would a South Korean torpedo two-thirds of the way through development today have anything to do with a Russian ship sinking off the coast of Spain a year and a half ago?
I’d wager this was Ukraine’s handiwork using conventional or drone weapons.
The reactors were bound for North Korean subs giving a potential motivation for the South Koreans. The Spanish claimed evidence of a supercavating torpedo strike.
Also the Ukrainians are rarely this mysterious when they blow something up. They are openly at war with Russia and thus don't need to be.
- the article is a year old, so those statements were made at least a year ago, 2) militaries aren't always super up front about their weapons programs timelines 3) the statement specifically said that even though it was "2/3" of the way through development, it had been tested. How do you know this wasn't the test?
It could have been Ukraine, but Ukraine does not have super cavitating torpedoes, so if that's the case the reporting on those and the shape charges must be wrong.
load more comments
(5 replies)
MRXUUV is a comically terrible acronym. Why even bother using the "x" from "extra" if you're going to make an acronym that reads like a silicon valley pyramid scheme?
Maybe it makes more sense to a first language Korean speaker/reader and we’re too English language to get it?
I think a limpet mine is a far more likely explanation, why risk such a heavily classified piece of technology falling into enemy hands?
To prevent the literal unpredictable madman neighbour with a mortal vendetta against you from getting a nuclear reactor.
Also, Russia already has super cavitating torpedoes, and there's not necessarily that much to learn from their pieces after impact.
Not saying a limpet mine isn't likely, but this also feels like exactly why SK is developing those torpedoes.
Whatever the cause of the initial blast was, Russia definitely scuttled the ship rather than have anyone else know what it was carrying.
Apparently they just do that sometimes.
Old news
don't know why im geting downvotes, this is old news.
Yeah, isn't this from last year? Or did it happen again? That photo looks familiar.
Well gee golly.
A Russian cargo ship carrying nuclear components for North Korea has a 'surprise accident'.
I can't think of anyone who might have wanted to arrange that accident, can you? I mean surely everyone wants North Korea to have nuclear stuff... Oh wait...
Unfortunately paywalled. Is this a delayed report on the one which was hit by a supercavating torpedo off the coast of Spain a few months ago or is this another sunk russian ship with reactors bound for North Korea's submarine program?
Depends on whether you consider December 23, 2024 "a few months ago".
It is about the ship, which was sunk off the coast of Spain. However the supercavating torpedo thing is not really proven to my knowledge. It would be very interesting, as Ukraine does not have that technology.
South k does, they 100% intercepted that. To cock block NK from geting those reactors.
CNN did a video recently about the one off Spain in the last couple of days. This is probably that one.
Why would they go the long way round?
Now that's how you renege on a gift!
"You are experiencing a car accident"
Likely, possibly, unexplained. Yet CNN somehow knows about it lmao.
Is that old news or did it happen again?
Lots of maybes in this headline
must be greenpeace, move along nothing to see here
(also it's old news atp)
What an unfortunate thing to happen on free eggs night.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
343 points (100.0% liked)
World News
56283 readers
2648 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS