271

The GOP's once sure-fire odds to retain their Senate majority in the midterms are looking bleaker every day, but according to a new report from Politico, some in the party are plotting a "coup" that could save them from a complete wipeout: flipping John Fetterman, the increasingly ostracized Democratic senator. Fetterman was first elected to the Senate from Pennsylvania in 2022, besting the Trump-backed Republican Dr. Mehmet Oz and helping Democrats defy the odds and grow their majority in the chamber. Initially styling himself as a working-class progressive champion, he has since made a major shift away from his own party, voicing support for various initiatives and nominees from President Donald Trump and breaking the Democratic minority on several key votes.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 145 points 3 months ago

This implies Shitterman needs to be flipped.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 57 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The flip part has to do with who is senate leader, and all the powers that come with it.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

all the powers that come with it

Arguing over who gets to own the "Send more money to Israel" committee chairmanship

Let's get real. The power in the Senate isn't with the individual Senators, any more than the power in F-1 is with the drivers.

[-] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Individual Senators do have power when their peers are trying to pass something or prevent something.

That’s how Senator Lisa Murkowski (R), from Alaska, was able to get her state special concessions negotiated in order to pass the unfavorable OBB bill which was anything but beautiful.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

The senate majority leader has a lot of procedural power.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Significantly less than the House Speaker, as a point of comparison. Also, the Majority Leader tends to be the Senator with the largest lifetime fundraising haul. When a Senator (like Cruz or Paul or Lee or Sanders) doesn't need the money to win reelection, they can get out-of-pocket very quickly.

Individual Committee Chairmen have significant power. And Majority Leader gets to nominate the Chairmen. But the future prospective Chairmen back the Majority Leader in exchange for the nominations. So it's a Chicken-Egg situation, where the real pull comes from electing more Senators to back you, not strong-arming them with procedure once everyone is sworn in.

One consequence of the Platner primary win in Maine is that he's personally at-odds with Schumer out of the gate. By contrast, both Schumer and Fetterman are nakedly Zionist. Platner is more of a threat to Schumer's future reclamation of Majority Leader than Fetterman, as a result.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 88 points 3 months ago

All it took for him to align with MAGA was brain damage.

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

There was a guy I knew back in high school, he was an idiot, and he knew it, he was one of the rare idiots who would actually listen to someone smarter than him if you tried to explain things to him. He leaned fairly conservative to begin with, but when he said some stupid bullshit you could get him to change his mind if you explained why it was stupid.

At some point I heard that he died, turns out that was exaggerated a bit, but he did get a pretty bad head injury, spent some time in a coma, etc. but he is mostly ok

But the next time I ran into him I noticed that he's just not as willing to hear things out and change his mind anymore, and I can't help but think that's the brain damage.

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Start pattern matching people with obvious facial indications of fetal alcohol syndrome; they're typically on an extreme and can't be reasoned with.

[-] ulkesh@piefed.social 4 points 3 months ago

On par with every other republican.

[-] Alandrus_Sun@ttrpg.network 55 points 3 months ago

Flip Fetteman? They can have him. Garbage politician that only won his seat because he was against Dr.Oz.

[-] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 15 points 3 months ago

He put on a pretty good front up until his stroke right before the primary. It's debatable whether what he has become since is who he was all along, but he definitely won for more reasons than merely not being Oz, the carpetbagger.

[-] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago

It's not flipping. It's making it publicly official.

[-] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This matters for leadership as Fetterman still caucuses with the Democrats.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

We badly need:

  1. Term limits

  2. A recall process for all elected officials

  3. To abolish the senate

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 11 points 3 months ago

Or, just get people to vote the way the GOPs do.

Look up Jerry Falwell and his Moral Majority. Jerry was a televangelist who grabbed the GOP by the grassroots.

He used his extensive mailing list to find the small local GOP clubs that decide who is going to be the next sheriff or country clerk. If there'd been twenty people at the last meeting, Jerry's folks would show up with fifty.

[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 months ago

That’s kind of smart. Find elections that are so volatile, you can easily amass a small group to tip the tides. Win that election, and use your newfound influence to snowball the effect into larger and larger wins over time.

Only problem is that it’s predatory on small town folk who have a working, albeit delicate, political system. It’s using their delicate platform as a stepping stone for self-promotion, denying them a voice on their own platform in the process.

Only other problem is that it apparently works, if people are fucking doing it.

[-] deft@lemmy.wtf 3 points 3 months ago
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Because it is, by design, an undemocratic institution that gives rural voters multiple times as much power as voters who live in more populated areas.

[-] deft@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 months ago

I think reforms are in need there specifically on gerrymandering but also ranked voting.

The senate isn't an undemocratic institution that's literally insane to say about something that relies on elections to get into

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It is insane to say an institution where representatives of 10% of the population can thwart the interests of the other 90% (Source) is democratic. Russia has elections, that doesn't make it a functioning democracy.

[-] deft@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 months ago

Russia's elections are known to be a facade like in North Korea. And I do agree America isn't authentic in their elections either.

But the senate is one of the few spaces we get elections often and specifically for our locality. I don't think the senate as a concept is a problem, I think there are flaws in the execution

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Or we abolish the senate and expand the house to the several thousand representatives it should actually be. Term limits on legislators in a small legislature just makes the party even more powerful because nobody will have name recognition except the party. It also highly encourages working with lobbyists who promise to get you a cushy landing spot after your term. For what most people have an issue with, an age cap with a good retirement would work.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

What's there to flip? He's already voting Republican.

[-] Soulphite@reddthat.com 18 points 3 months ago

He wasn't already flipped? This is news... how?

Fetterman is a big fat phony who hit his head one too many times. Brain damage and MAGA go together like flies on shit.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago
[-] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Terror for non-white non-Christians, or status quo?

Idiot.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So when does it get better? I watched my parents and grandparents vote blue no matter who until they died. I’ve done the same my entire adult life and we continue to sink deeper into fascism. The democrats are where the republicans were 26 years ago. We literally can’t ratchet any further right without a full blown genocide. Even the civil rights leaders who were murdered by our government saw through the charade. We are paying for a genocide in a colony that has universal healthcare and free college and both parties support it. When does it get better what’s the plan here? Both parties are fascist war mongering pedophiles! When does it get better? What’s the plan? because I don’t believe we will see the extreme damage this administration has done reversed without a revolution

[-] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago

Try to get involved with the party locally and make your case to your IRL peers there. Real change has to come from the bottom.

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Flipping Fetterman? The brain damage already did that.

[-] volore@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

... implying he doesn't already go along with their bullshit as it is? Cute. Stupid, wrong, but cute.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

quietly

Bro, he was on FOX News just last week. The anchorman was just shy of openly fellating him.

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 4 points 3 months ago

Switching parties is not unheard of and certainly not a coup. Not like he was voting against the GOP much to begin with, so leaving him out of the Dem count won't change much anyway. Just like Manchin and Sinema, they take the DNC money and resources but don't agree with any of the party platform or priorities once the election ends.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

He won the primary?!?!

WTF PA?!?!?!!!!

[-] Watermark710@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago

Not only did he win, he got more than twice the votes as the second place guy. He won literally every county, and not by small margins.

https://www.cnn.com/election/2022/results/pennsylvania/democratic-primaries/senate

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It’s good that you posted this on Lemmy.

[-] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Trumps dictatorship dream is predicated on people voting the same way they did last time

I suspect the GOP are in for the shock of their lives

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

They’re not going to be shocked because they are rigging it in their favor. I think it’s the libs who are going to be shocked this November when there is blatant cheating and no one in power puts up a fuss. It’s not like the Republicans have never stolen an election with the permission of the Democrats before (2000 and 2024 to name two).

[-] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Oh sure but his support has atrophied and he is a toxic brand. They will struggle to win safe states let alone borderline states. These attempts to cheat may well end up angering his supporters even more.

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You are still assuming that he actually has to win anything. He could straight up cancel elections and no one would do anything except huff and puff a bit. The Supreme Court and Congress are both controlled by his people and they would back him all the way, regardless of how illegal it is. He has no concerns about "the people" either. We have shown him how toothless and apathetic we are. And besides that, he has the backing of the Epstein class and all of their money.

[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

https://lemmy.world/post/44104254

that post identifies that there are a number of politicians who don't reason, think, or debate Netanyahu's "Israel".

Their explanation for it is kompromat: blackmail.

Their argument is convincing.

Please see that Fetterman is described, in there, in a way which does suggest either ideological-possession or kompromat.

_ /\ _

this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
271 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30843 readers
1822 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS