265

Experts are sounding alarms just over a year out from November 2024 that the presidential election could suffer from chaos and confusion after high turnover of local election officials and workers in key states.

Threats and scrutiny often linked to false claims of voter fraud have contributed to a surge of local election officials leaving their posts in recent years. The exodus could mean understaffed and inexperienced teams are left to grapple with continued conspiracies and misinformation surrounding the election process in 2024, with some running a high-stakes presidential election for the first time.

Richard Hasen, an election law expert and a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law, said he’s “quite worried” about the attrition of election officials and workers nationwide but argued it’s “not surprising” given the threats and harassment lobbed at many in the jobs.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

Republicans will never stop trying to steal elections.

Fascists gonna fascism

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago
[-] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago

This. Where are people assigned to protect election workers? I do think there is some agencies that can direct their efforts in protecting election workers. Democracy is not negotiable.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're part of the coup.

[-] specseaweed@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

If you care about this issue, you can go and be a part of the solution. Go to your state's Secretary of State website and sign up to help.

I did it and it was super easy and a little boring.

This whole thing depends on normal ass people like you doing it. Give it a shot.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Full disclosure, my wife is an elected Precinct Committee Person or PCP.

She has a couple of jobs, #1 being as we're a 100% vote by mail state, she calls people who haven't submitted a ballot yet to remind them of deadlines for mailing.

The other thing she does, which I won't let her do alone, is monitoring ballot drop off locations to make sure nobody is engaging in intimidation or vandalism.

But there aren't anywhere near enough people like her.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Thanks to your wife for doing a mostly thankless job.

[-] 7112@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

I've worked as a poll worker since 2019. It's actually a great thing to do. 99% of the people are wonderful. Voters are rarely the issue. However, Poll watchers have been getting worst and more confrontational. I dread 2024.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The worst thing about poll watchers is that they don't have the first idea of what they're watching for. They get upset because they can't identify normal election procedure. We saw this with the 2000 mules video.

ZOMG! PEOPLE DROPPING OFF MULTIPLE BALLOTS!

Yeah, that's allowed. One person dropping off multiple ballots is NOT a marker of fraud. That is NOT what determines if a ballot is valid or not.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Threats and scrutiny often linked to false claims of voter fraud have contributed to a surge of local election officials leaving their posts in recent years.

People leaving these posts can be a double blow — their exit leads to a loss of experience and knowledge of the complicated work, and they’re replaced with newer, inexperienced workers who are possibly more prone to mistakes or slowdowns.

“That seems like a really small, sort of nominal thing, except if voters are driving around looking for a place to vote, and they can’t find it, sometimes it doesn’t take that much to deter somebody from showing up out of frustration,” she said.

A downed website, a misposted spreadsheet or another small-scale technical error in any of the thousands of local election jurisdictions in 2024 could be an issue some seize on and circulate.

Some pointed especially to rapidly developing artificial intelligence tech, deep-fake videos and computer-generated images that could aid the quick spread of false information about the 2024 process.

A new report from Voting Rights Lab found that “election-related conspiracy theories, death threats, and intimidation tactics” have led to “an exodus of experienced election officials” in Arizona.


The original article contains 1,262 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

People leaving these posts can be a double blow — their exit leads to a loss of experience and knowledge of the complicated work, and they’re replaced with newer, inexperienced workers who are possibly more prone to mistakes or slowdowns.

Or prone to trying to put their thumb on the scale. A lot of MAGA zealots think that the Democrats cheat and therefor have no compunction about cheating themselves. Those people would be more than willing to take such positions in order to influence the election outcome.

[-] books@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've worked in elections and it's not an easy process. Most people just can't pick it up and run with it.

Deadlines, ballot printing issues, machine issues, training staff, weather, website issues, uocava, ada compatible machines, precincts, accurate address files, ballot shortages etc etc.

Shit is tough. My heart goes out to all the people who are doing this now under the unfounded scrutiny that this stupid old ball sack put on people. All of a sudden people with no knowledge about elections are "experts" and some are now running the show.

Hopefully liberal groups who are buying the voter files are watching for fucked deadlines to sue the piss out of these morons

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
265 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2421 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS