125
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CptHacke@piefed.social 129 points 3 weeks ago

Both are correct. I don't see the Fediverse ever becoming as large as the billionaire platform for the precise reason that it isn't run by billionaires with gigantic advertising budgets. As such, the Fediverse will not have the large numbers of users and hence, will be quieter.

That being said, the Fediverse IS an alternative to the billionaire platforms - especially for people who desire smaller, more intimate communities and - perhaps most importantly - controlled and governed by the people who use it.

[-] mayako 26 points 3 weeks ago

This.

One of the reasons that billionaire controlled tech platforms become so mainstream IS their ability to grow and spread, and eventually become de facto means of communication online.

This allows them to break out of the early adopter, technical space and spread to a wider audience

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 22 points 3 weeks ago

as long as there are enough people and content here, why should we even care if everyone isnt here? I dont even want every idiot here.

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 16 points 3 weeks ago

Preach. I'm happy to only hang out with the sort of people who see the value in social media by the people and for the people. Sometimes it's messy, some of us are kinda annoying, but it's always going to be better than corpo shit.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Let me rephrase then. What is there to protect the Fediverse from control?

[-] CptHacke@piefed.social 30 points 3 weeks ago

The Fediverse is decentralized, which means that it cannot (or at least it would be very, very difficult) be shut down by anyone. On an individual level, any user is free to start their own instance or community with their own rules in place should another instance or community become undesirable. If there is something you don't like or that is somehow stifling to you, start your own and make it the way you want it.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

How is that going to protect the space?

I can start an instance right now. But that doesn't mean it will have any kind of importance. If I can create new spaces, and let's say it grows, wouldn't the problems from the first instance just carry over.

So I'm wondering how this is a solution to safe guard against tech billionaires?

[-] Skavau@piefed.social 15 points 3 weeks ago

How is that going to protect the space?

Because it isn't a singular space. An instance that goes bad can be tethered from the rest of the wider network, and abandoned, leaving it on its own.

I can start an instance right now. But that doesn’t mean it will have any kind of importance. If I can create new spaces, and let’s say it grows, wouldn’t the problems from the first instance just carry over.

I don't know what you mean by "problems with the first instance".

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ok please humor me then here. Can you walk me through a situation where an instance would untether itself. One day lemmy becomes super popular. People notice it as a platform to get information on. Millions of views an hour. Peter Thiel is paying chinese click farms to post manosphere content in popular lemmy communities. Musk is linking "no kings 5.0" lemmy posts to his followers on X who are brigading the comments. The moderators of the most popular lemmy.world communities are Marvel executives and Billionare Pedophiles.

So now we abandon it and leave. What does that mean as far as protecting that instance from that same thing happening?

We've cut the hyrda's head clean off. Now what? Do users all move to the new instance? Is all the bad from the first instance just going to contain itself to that instance? What protection is in place?

[-] Skavau@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ok please humor me then here. Can you walk me through a situation where an instance would untether itself. One day lemmy becomes super popular. People notice it as a platform to get information on. Millions of views an hour. Peter Thiel is paying chinese click farms to post manosphere content in popular lemmy communities. Musk is linking “no kings 5.0” lemmy posts to his followers on X who are brigading the comments. The moderators of the most popular lemmy.world communities are Marvel executives and Billionare Pedophiles.

I think this is so ridiculous as to essentially constitute fantasy. Lemmy.world, the largest Lemmy instance has about 40% of the active userbase (and declining slowly as a share of overall users) out of a pool of about 40k users. I don't think that's sufficient if Lemmy.world tried to cut itself off from every other network, they'd shed a lot of users who have people and communities they interact with outside of the main instance.

If Lemmy became popular, it across the instances would become popular. Not just one instance.

If for some reason a single instance did become hyperpopular and obnoxious to interact on, the lemmy software would still be accessible to rebuild another ecosphere elsewhere.

So now we abandon it and leave. What does that mean as far as protecting that instance from that same thing happening?

I'm not sure you know what an "instance" is. Can you tell me what you think an instance is?

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

There has been instances already where instances have disappeared, been defereated, and or just failed to keep up with the new changes in the protocols we all call home.

People have migrated pretty quick to other instances, other communities, etc..etc...

For example I was on lemmy.world for a good year or so before piefed. And they are both excellent platforms! Jumping instances is actually really easy and you dont lose much.

Jumping instances, making your own, etc...etc... are things you cant really do outside the fediverse. You cant just spin up a twitter clone an expect it to interop with twitter outside giving massive $$ to API costs (and thats if THEY allow it). Here I have spun up my own lemmy/piefed/mastodon/gotosocial/peertube instances and communicated with people on the respective platforms.

In a nutshell we have more control to do what we want. If I dont like what piefed and rimu/others are doing, I can fork and make a mesa-piefed with flapjacks and other things. And it will work with lemmy.world day 1.

We have the power. Thats what makes us different.

[-] one_old_coder@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

paying chinese click farms to post manosphere content

I block people, I block instances, I block communities. Problem solved. It looks like you're stirring shit like an annoying russian agent that would love to stir shit.

You know what I'll do after reading all the comments in this thread? I'll block you because you're annoying, and then the problem will be solved.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 3 weeks ago

An instance doesn't need to federate with others.

I've long surmised that the future of lemmy / activitypub is a fragmented one. Federation only works if everyone instances are participating in good faith. There are instances that are generally not federated with because they do not participate in good faith.

If at any point you feel that "billionaires" are encroaching on your experience, there will always be a next refuge.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

That anyone can run a node. I could put one in my basement.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Including billionaires or heritage foundation or Thiel. Also what would you do with this node? Significance matters right now. Numbers and engagement matters. The left have lost significance and engagement year over year. You can stand up a node but how does this safe guard our spaces from being over run?

[-] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

I can defederate from those instances. Problem solved. So can you.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

Numbers and engagement matters

What does one do with numbers and engagement on the Fediverse?

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Share ideas. Build community. Raise awareness. You build hype.

With enough numbers and engagement you can resist the spread of the right and push back.

[-] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 4 points 3 weeks ago
  • Everyone can create an instance (Well, at least anyone who can pay for a domainname and hosting, which is the basic requirement for every webservice)
  • As default, instances federate with each other
  • Instances that are bad neighbors get defederated

That's it, basically. Even if someone bought up all instances and domainnames (which would require that server admins sell them, which i can't see many doing, or else they wouldn't run a fediverse service in the first place), there's nothing stopping you from creating a new instance outside of the control of this person the same day. It literally cannot be simply taken over by, say, Microsoft.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Right, and I'm thinking this is not actually a solid way to protect fediverse from what is happening everywhere else.

We can all create instances, but there needs to be engagement for it to matter. I'm not looking at this from the point of view of "what can I do to enjoy my time on the internet while my rights are taken away and I'm told my sister should go to jail for wanting an abortion"

There is a pattern that occurs with seizing digital spaces. It starts small. They begin dog whistling in small communities. Not enough to get banned. Just enough to get reactions. Based off the reaction they target a few of the weaker ones. Whistles get louder. They link those to their influencers who post to their base. That base begin to show up and the community begins to fracture. Mods get overwhelmed. Ask for help to increase mod team. Some of the new mod team are the very people poisoning the community or are affiliated. The new moderators make it worse. Users begin to block or leave the communities. More dog whistles. More growth from the right until the community is captured. They move on to target another bigger community and are now using the first community as a pool to feed into the bigger one and turn it. So you can de-federate but nothing really stops the attacks. There is no real mechanism right now to guard against what has happened as far as I see it.

If lemmy were to grow as big as other sites, it will be just as likely to swing hard right unless something else is done.

[-] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The "swing to the hard right" comes as soon as more normies arrive. There are basically two ways this goes:

a) badly behaved normies get the boot. comes with the side effect of keeping the cost for instance admins low and the work for mod teams small, but also means that we stay a niche. I have no issues with this.

b) normies come here and do as they always do. this is your scenario. Since normies - since they are normies - will simply swarm to single instances, as we saw at the API exodus, the rest of the fediverse will sooner or later defederate from those single instances if they aren't able to keep their normie horde in check. This is fine, actually. If i really want to look at something only the normies are talking about, i can simply fire up my normie-instance account and see all i want.

Since we have a simple mechanism of keeping badly behaved instances in check, i cannot see how your scenario actually comes to fruit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If you're wanting a planned in advance ideal solution, that's not really possible, but people can collectively respond to problems as they happen and adapt, as long as they aren't constrained from doing so.

I believe the pattern and tactics you describe are always going to be more effective on a platform controlled by a company like Reddit, because any efforts to counter them are ultimately limited by the agenda of the platform owners. There are people on Reddit trying to investigate and call out deceptive commercial spam, but when the spammers block them to prevent a response, set their post history to be unreadable, buy moderator positions, and admins only care about their own power and profitability (cutting users off from api etc), the deck is stacked against them. In the end it's just not their website.

Ultimately this is an organizational challenge, not only a technical or platform design challenge. If the organization is a collection of users who generally want genuine non-manipulative interaction between real people, and the protocol is set up to make it easy for them to route around malicious attempts to usurp control, that doesn't mean immediate victory over adversaries but it is a big leg up.

[-] StillAlive@piefed.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

User unfriendlyness.

Visually, Fediverse isn't like reddit, instagram, or any other popular social media places.

You need to put in some effort to even browse it.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 3 weeks ago

All scaled Internet sites, no matter the country, shows that there needs to be control of some sort. The problem is that there isn't a way to create a distributed way of control/ownership.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

But there is. Between the two options, moderation or community controls, I'll pick community controls.

But this is kind of my point. Lemmy should not be recreating what we already know end up as a tool that is used by authoritarians to control us. Lemmy should be generating more new ideas and testing them out. New instances with new features. Some will work some won't. It's why I get a little pissed off seeing people who claim to be leftist, claim they'll punch a nazi, claim that Trump and Bezos and capitalism is responsible for great suffering who them go on to just use lemmy for posting feel good fun time cat pictures and moth memes. We should be doing more. Because at some point we'll need tools and by the time we need them we're not going to have time to fiddle fuck trying to get them to work. We needed tools 15 years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The decentralization is there, but in theory the owner of the largest node could defederate from everyone else, forcing users to leave the largest instance or put up with it?

It would be a lot like Meta in that way - the only reason it has survived is because everyone was already there and there's no way in hell to get everyone to switch to the same new thing. I genuinely don't know which direction users would go, lemmy users are an odd bunch.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

it's a step in the right direction but still a small step and it took a lot of effort

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 3 weeks ago

I think we need to be okay with less users because the billionaire platforms use bots, anyways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Getting mad at the people here just to have fun is about as useful as the people that come here just to stir up trouble. If people aren't having fun here, people aren't going to join or stay.

I post daily animal content. Anyone just scrolling can just scroll and click on cute animal and move on with life. But for those that want to read the posts, you will find ample opportunities of all varieties to get involved. As much as I'd like it to be different, everyone on here has their own reasons they can't or won't get involved, but a couple might. It's gotten me to work at a rescue for 2 years now, and one or 2 others have DMed me saying they got involved with places I've helped them find, and a handful more have done things to make their homes more suitable to bring back animals or donated to places doing amazing rescue work. It's not changing the world, but it hasn't been pointless.

We've got some communities that I think are great, like Dull Men's Club. Again, everyday activities, but it's people doing small acts to make something better than it was. I'd love to have activists here teaching folks how to unionize, set up aid programs, etc, but the pool of those folks is very small. The news and politics communities we have do seem to be full of a number of very outspoken and angry people. It turns me off to participating in most threads. It's not surrounding one's self in an echo chamber or safe space, but most of us deal with enough IRL obnoxious people to want to do it more here. I read the article if it's interesting and skip the comments. I'd probably like talking about a lot of the events with people here, but not if the same handful of obnoxious people are going to insert themselves into every thread, but that is what happens in a public forum. Until someone creates and mods better communities and has the patience to be trashed daily in Power Trippin Mods because it's effectually impossible to ban people, this is what we're going to have.

It's sad I can't recommend Lemmy to most people I know. I think about not posting here anymore from time to time, but the platform is a good size for me to handle my audience, and there are a ton of really great users here. My content doesn't pull in the angry crowd typically either. But as a whole, we got a lot of anger, misplaced or not, being the first things new folks are going to see. I'm not huge into the memes or comics a lot of the time, but people generally are going to react much more positively to that than more anarchy/communist rage posts.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

My issue is that there were Nazis in my park recently holding a rally. A lot. Last year they were on over passes. Marching in streets. Women are arrested in democratic countries now for things that we thought were personal rights. People are disappeared by the government and people cheer it on.

So I like cat pictures and having fun. But is that what leftist should be focused on right now?

I'm asking to find out where people are with all this. Is lemmy a last bastion in a digital world that is mostly captured by right leaning billionaires who will inevitably come for us or are we just going to have fun or like 5 more years and then when its much worse go "oh fuck yea would have been cool to fight back when we had the tools and time."

I'm just worried we're giving a limited window of opportunity that is quickly closing.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I largely agree with you, which is why I decided to participate in this post. I felt you were just losing the focus a bit from the frustration you came in with and from some of the people arguing with you here.

Like you said, I'd love to see more community building and the growth of actual movements here, but I don't know if that can be done on a generalist platform. I've got 6000+ subscribers here, and like I said, I'd say maybe a dozen of those users have actually been moved to do something. I don't begrudge the ones that are just "cute pic!" and move on with their day. If this was a comment section on www.progressiveleftycauses.com, I could be mad, but that's not what this is. I think it's important to maintain realistic expectations for a social platform. Everybody can easily jump in with a joke or a complaint, but getting strangers to do stuff is really hard. Hell, I can't even get most people to actually reply with "Great pic!" It just is what it is.

There's still nothing stopping you or I from pushing out agendas here. But that also goes for the jokers and the party crashers. I do agree that this platform may lose the inertia to become a practical haven for progressive causes as its major purpose, but it can always still support some of that.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I do appreciate that and you're right about losing focus. I get a little bent out of shape over some of the more ignorant comments from people.

I get not wanting to begrudge the "Cute pic" people but everyday I just don't get it. What are people on the left doing. It's just so sad to me to see what it's become that I don't know what future it holds and that sucks. This is a lefty space and its just the realization that this is it. It's what is left and people don't even see it or care. They can't be bothered.

I have a lot of anger from going on any other digital space and seeing outright racism and sexism and just horrible shit that is now so common. And I come to lemmy and people keep promoting the idea of just ignoring things that irk them.

NO action. NO fight. Just block and move on.

Wouldn't that be just what the right would love for us to do? Block them instead of challenging them. It makes me realize the left may be dying not because we did our best and fought and actually tried but instead we willingly gave up and convinced each other to as well.

For me, Lemmy is the last nail in the coffin in a digital frontier that highlights this. I don't even know if people know how bad it is because most people here just block and avoid things they do not like since they are the "cute pic" people.

In a world where numbers and engagement matter most, how do we not partially blame them especially when the "cute pic" people are avoiding the world because they hate the situation but they're just not willing put up with it enough to push back like others.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

This is a lefty space

Is it? Which lefties? People dogpile on the ML creators all day, every day. Personally, I'm mostly okay with the M and hate the L from my understanding of each. But they still decided to let us all hang out here.

I want change, but I'm nearing 50 and not in great physical shape. There's only so much revolution I can do. I try to educate the public on things I think are important and to try to get them to internalize value in the things that they might want to protect for future generations. Fundraising, logistics, and mobilizing aren't my strengths. I don't know many people that could do that stuff really well. Lots of us are here because we're fairly introverted and are here having these conversations anonymously with strangers. If being revolutionary was easy, we'd either be in a lot less (or a lot more) turmoil than we're in now. Most of us can't make it our whole "thing."

We could and should be doing more to speak to what kind of voices we will or won't tolerate here in the communties though. I'm getting some heat for defending the big game hunter even though I don't agree with what he stood for, but I feel people were pushing a lot of internalized anger at the system onto this random guy who seemingly did nothing ethically wrong. I could have shut up and moved on, but this is a topic I feel I understand more than the average person here and was willing to call them out on their indecent behavior even if it means they're going to hate me or think less of me now. There's plenty of people they could wish harm upon and while I'm not the type to join in, there's a number of people I could name where I wouldn't be sad if they were gone, but this guy seemed fair innocuous in the grand scheme.

Lemmy is far from the last chance we have. Three years ago, 95% of us didn't have this, but we still tried to do our thing somewhere else. Piefed in providing great opportunity for those that still want to interact with Lemmy without some of the baggage. And more apps and forums will continue to pop up. You can always start an old school forum as well with myBB or what have you. That may be a better style of platform for something like what you want to see anyway since it's more specific, but at the same time, it narrows the audience potential greatly. While I don't necessarily support or condemn what cowbee, for example, promotes, I think the way they can appear in tangentially related posts and have a prepared means to unobtrusively yet powerfully share their beliefs to potentially receptive people is a solid example for others looking to do something similar. Keep looking around, see what works and what doesn't, and keep going for what you believe. You can do it here, somewhere else, all of the above, whatever. Be passionate and be helpful and receptive and you will get people to listen to you. It may not be to the extent you want very often, but we gotta take the wins we can get. Stay strong, and try to stay positive.

[-] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

What are people on the left doing.

You also have to remember that there isn't just some single entity of "left". And I don't mean only the ideological divides even, I mean there's tons of different cultures with different political cultures in them. What even "being left" means is wildly different if you compare USA or some random nation elsewhere.

This platform is mostly USAians yes, but not only. Do you mean american leftist unity? Because looking for some sort of general left unity is a lot more complicated than unity inside a single political system

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe I watch too many movies, but the more politically active I plan to be, the more my online presence will fall in line with the "cute pic" people. The internet is for cat pics, surveillance, and shouting into the void. Real change needs to happen outside now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Lemmy is quickly becoming (maybe it always was) a self masturbatory exercise in anti-capitalist Marxist thought. Don't get me wrong, we need to fight capitalism at every moment. This is THE moment.

However, what I've gleaned is that the discussion here cannot step away from theory into the realm of prescriptions. Because prescriptions would entail confronting the harsh reality of the real world and end the little intellectual amusement park that are the lefty anti-capitalist memes.

In other words, Lemmy is acting exactly as designed: a containment space for tankie and lefties to never have to contend with real world actions. Billionaires love spaces like Lemmy because if we ever move the conversation away from memes, thats when they start shaking. But they know exactly that won't happen in places like Lemmy. The merry-go-round is just so much fun!

[-] Eric 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I agree, but at the same time, would we have the alt-right if it weren't for spaces like 4chan and /r/theDonald that allowed them to build a sense of community and identity? This is better than jerking on Reddit in a sea of bots and "moderates"

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

In a word: distraction. Alternately, the "circuses" in "bread and circuses"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

Given how much "guilluotine memes" are on here...

no, this is not a "billionaire platform"

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

My point is for how long? At some point it either dies out or becomes popular enough to attract that attention. And so I'm asking now, because we never did with the other sites, what can we do to prevent it. Because these spaces are running out rapidly.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The memes are distraction fodder. It's like an amusement park so we never move into prescriptive discourse

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 4 points 3 weeks ago

Billionaire Lemmy admins? Where do I get my check?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dwt@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

Alternative, if you like your Platform not enshitified. I do.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
125 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39620 readers
1267 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS