158
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] foxymochakitten@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 hours ago

Blows my fuckin mind that fuckin Orange Palpatine is accidentally making the whole world switch to renewable energy while he turns the US into a dictatorship. Honestly, it kind of gives me some hope? Like how do you fuck up being H*tler so badly that you make the rest of the world a better place

[-] bigchungus@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 33 minutes ago

"Orange Palpatine" gives El Cheeto far too much credit. At least Darth Sidious was clever and could keep his pants up and mouth shut when he benefits from it.

[-] BeardededSquidward 2 points 2 hours ago

I get accused of being an accelerationist that I hope when everything is said and done, something good comes out of this fucking mess. I didn't vote for Trump, hate republicans, but trying to hope for a shiny little sliver is apparently accelerationist.

[-] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

The guy has an uncanny knack of accelerating good things, despite trying his darndest to destroy everything good.

Canada was becoming divided before he came along, Tesla was considered a viable brand, and now he’s inadvertently driving the world to renewables.

What’s next? He somehow tries to take Greenland and ends up ridding the world of micro plastics?

[-] aev_software@programming.dev 17 points 11 hours ago

Maybe. Or it's going to force people to buy energy from local coal plants that this dictator forced to reopen.

[-] manxu@piefed.social 11 points 8 hours ago

What America does is not really that important, because America does have sufficient fossil fuel production to satisfy its own energy needs. It has an incentive to continue using fossil fuels, simply because it produces them.

I think it's much more important what the big economies do that don't have that option: Europe, China, India, Africa. They should have electrified a long time ago, but haven't because of a host of reasons, mostly the cost of switching technologies.

A sudden supply shock like this can make you quickly forget costs of switching. Sort of like a catalyst in chemistry: closing the Strait of Hormuz is a little like putting platinum in your exhaust pipe, it makes things happen that wouldn't otherwise (including making them less polluting).

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago

Currently it’s looking like there’s a big push for renewables due to this. The underlying military threat also makes renewables attractive since their distributed nature makes them very difficult to target, unlike an energy plant.

[-] aev_software@programming.dev 9 points 10 hours ago

And that may work well everywhere in the world except where dictators are forcing power plants to reopen coal processing, like here in the USA.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

thenemaype organize and protest instead of just taking it once again?

[-] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 6 points 9 hours ago

Then youre going to yave brown outs. Brown outs and lung cancer.

[-] achsonaja@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Blackouts and black lungs

[-] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

As strange as it seems given the whole, you know, this, the United States is only a small part of the world.

Little Donald ordering closed coal plants to reopen like a Captain Planet villain is only going to impact a relatively small number of power plants - and those coal plants are going to close back down as soon as they're legally allowed to, for the same reason they closed in the first place, because they don't make economic sense anymore.

Meanwhile, the people buying solar because they can't trust oil and gas supplies, and the governments investing in renewables because they don't want to be held hostage the next time the United States gets a bug up its ass about Iran, will still have those solar and renewables long after Little Donald has retired to his private massage parlor in Mar-A-Lago.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 hours ago

i can speak to this drirectly. i spent 10 years from when i was 12 to wheo i was 22 protesting at a century old coal plant that had been designed to run for 30 years. i stopped demanding its closure because it closed. wind power in West Virginia was able to take up the slack. now, 12 years later, the president signed an executive order requiring the power company re-open it. not just a blanket order that included it. it was specifically named. it is now federal policy that coal plants that have already been replaced and shut down be re-opened.

the war against the land has reached a new temprement with those who wage the war switching from passive combat to active combat. but the land will win. in may not be in my lifetime, but almost worse might be if it is. the land is undefeatable. it has existed for 6.4 billion years. humanity has been at war with it for only about 3000. we are bound to lose if we figat against the land simply because the land's victory is inevitable. it will still be here even if everyone of us is dead.

i fight to protect the land because i want to be on the winning side

this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
158 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8560 readers
453 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS