40
submitted 1 week ago by dessalines@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

Isn't that just the list of wars involving the United States

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Almost entirely overlapping, especially since many of NATO's ops are in Africa, when it's focus is supposed to be limited to Europe.

That's nearly impossible to answer:

  • Are only NATO operations included?
  • How would combined operations be counted (Afghanistan was under a wider UN umbrella)?
  • What's even the civilian definition?
[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

Also what counts as a civilian killed by NATO as opposed to a civilian killed in a war NATO was involved in but who killed them is unclear or it wasn't NATO?

But we do know that the USA has opened fire on civilians before with them as the target and there were no hostile forces around.

[-] Bazell@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

This can just be a provocative question to present NATO negatively.

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Yes, specifically NATO operations, not necessarily ones that NATO members took part in.

A civilian means a non-combatant.

[-] communism@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

This is not what you asked, but the only resource that immediate comes to mind is countercurrents' list of every invasion the US has carried out compiled in 2013: https://www.countercurrents.org/polya050713.htm

I'm not sure if anyone's compiled what you're asking for. Of course the death toll of the US directly both contains events that pre-date NATO, and NATO contains countries other than the US.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: Breaks rule 1

Reporter, the first rule of Lemmy is you don’t make false reports against site admins’ posts.

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Rule 1... do they think it's racist to be against NATO now lol. Probably including "anti-white" in their definition of bigotry.

[-] Bazell@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is a way too broad range of variables to calculate properly. Include specifications.

[-] GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

About 350 thousand according to this source whe you can find a list and a very conservative death count: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202307/10/WS64ab6988a310bf8a75d6e3a2.html

The most deadly NATO intervention is the Iraq war, in October 2006 the Lancet estimated the following:

Three misattributed clusters were excluded from the final analysis; data from 1849 households that contained 12 801 individuals in 47 clusters was gathered. 1474 births and 629 deaths were reported during the observation period. Pre-invasion mortality rates were 5·5 per 1000 people per year (95% CI 4·3–7·1), compared with 13·3 per 1000 people per year (10·9–16·1) in the 40 months post-invasion. We estimate that as of July, 2006, there have been 654 965 (392 979–942 636) excess Iraqi deaths as a consequence of the war, which corresponds to 2·5% of the population in the study area. Of post-invasion deaths, 601 027 (426 369–793 663) were due to violence, the most common cause being gunfire

https://web.archive.org/web/20150907130701/http://brusselstribunal.org/pdf/lancet111006.pdf

https://brusselstribunal.org/pdf/lancet111006.pdf

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Nice, the top link is a good list, although it feels like there are a lot of interventions are missing.

I've also heard the estimates for total casualties of the US/NATO war on Iraq to be ~1M people, but that could be including other deaths related from the infrastructure collapse caused by the war.

[-] probable_possum@leminal.space 3 points 1 week ago

Do you mean NATO (defense operations if one member is attacked)? Wars started by a NATO member? Unofficial proxy war support?

[-] GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

The answer is actually "a mix of all three," and it really depends on which conflict you're looking at.

For Afghanistan, it was exactly the first one: the only time Article 5, the "attack on one is an attack on all" clause, has ever been invoked. That happened after 9/11 and led directly to the NATO-led mission there.

Yugoslavia in 1999 was a different beast entirely; that was NATO waging an air campaign without a UN Security Council mandate, operating far outside its traditional defensive boundaries to stop ethnic cleansing in Kosovo.

When you look at Iraq in 2003, NATO as an organization sat it out, but the war was obviously started by key NATO members like the US and UK, and the alliance itself only stepped in later to help train Iraqi security forces.

Finally, the 2011 Libya intervention was more of a formal NATO operation, but it fits the mold of an unofficial proxy war of sorts, as the alliance used a UN mandate to protect civilians as the basis for a bombing campaign that ultimately helped rebels overthrow Gaddafi

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
40 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

54122 readers
280 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS