1

I made a post asking specifically for DC fans their opinions. The people who responded aren’t actual fans—they’re just people who think they are fans but have never picked up a comic in their life. My question is: why do non-fans try so hard to engage with real fans?? You aren’t a real fan of DC, Marvel, or anything superhero-related, so you don’t deserve to be in the fandom space.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago

This is known as gatekeeping. There’s no such thing as a “real fan”. People from all walks of life want to be involved in a conversation about a thing they find enjoyable. If anything, we should welcome those looking to be involved or experienced with things they don’t yet understand.

This is a bit different if they’re confidently incorrect and argue, but I have to imagine this is not the majority. You can take on the role of an educator to help those that don’t know understand more.

[-] PixelNomad@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

This is known as gatekeeping.

There is literally nothing wrong with gatekeeping and yes there is such a thing as a "real fan"

[-] pressedhams 25 points 6 days ago

I’m a big fan of gatekeeping and I don’t appreciate you trying to say what is and isn’t gate keeping as you clearly aren’t a real fan of it.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 12 points 6 days ago

There is nothing wrong with [thing that is universally accepted as wrong]

Mate, I love you, but please consider that your opinions don't ALWAYS correspond with reality.

[-] PixelNomad@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

your opinions don’t ALWAYS correspond with reality.

If you don’t have knowledge of something, then you can’t really discuss it. Someone can’t and shouldn’t talk about Israel vs. Palestine if they don’t know anything about the history of the conflict.

And I think there are objectively some things that make you a fan of something, especially when most arguments against Batman are false. If you read one issue of one comic, or watch ONE episode—hell, HALF an episode—of Batman, how can you claim to be a fan of something, yet know NOTHING about the character outside of surface-level stuff?

Do I like Mario? Sure. Do I like his games? Sure. Did I like the movie? Yeah. Did I like the second one? No, not really. Am I a fan of Mario? No. Do I like it? Sure—but I don’t know much about the character to say I’m a fan. I can at least admit it.

Do I like Star Trek? Yes. Am I a ‘Trekkie’? No, because I only really like the three Star Trek movies with Chris Pine, the Original Series, and TNG and Voyager—and that’s it. So I’m not a ‘fan,’ and it would be disingenuous for someone to say, ‘you aren’t a Trekkie or a real Mario fan,’ and then for me to get offended when I genuinely am not.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago

That's your opinion and I can only repeat myself:

your opinions don’t ALWAYS correspond with reality.

[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago

Please define with concise and quantifiable metrics for what constitutes a real fan of DC

[-] PixelNomad@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

define with concise and quantifiable metrics for what constitutes a real fan of DC

Let’s look at some arguments against Batman.

“He beats up poor people.”

You could, again, say this about any rich superhero, but Batman doesn’t “beat up poor people.” Most of the people he fights are rich and wealthy crime lords who hurt innocent people in his city. That’s what the entire Court of Owls storyline is about. And even if the criminals are poor, these are still people who are going out of their way to choose to rape, kill, and maim people. The criminals who are criminals because they are poor—Batman gives them tons of job opportunities.

If someone is a pimp who pimps out underage girls, and is a rapist, an assassin, or a gang leader, should we not stop them because “they are poor”? Especially when they make so much money they could retire or go legit?

“He beats up the mentally ill.”

Again, Joker is doing what he’s doing because he wants to, and this is an insult to mentally ill people, because there are tons of mentally ill people who choose not to commit evil acts and want to treat their mental illness. Batman’s rogues gallery is not—and again, most supervillains are mentally ill—so this point is stupid.

“He recruits children.”

Teen Titans—the sidekicks of damn near every League member. And then they might say, “Well, they have powers.” They are still fighting threats that can kill them. Also, by this argument, you’re basically saying a teen should not be a superhero because he has no powers.

“Why doesn’t he use his wealth to help Gotham?”

Literally every comic, animated show, and movie shows he’s using his wealth to help Gotham.

A real fan of DC does not make these stupid arguments because they know it's objectively false.

[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago

Not to be a jerk but none of that was concise or quantifiable. It was just a bunch of random opinions on specific storylines.

[-] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

Bro... All of these points have been brought up in official media at one point or another. Does that mean those aren't "real" DC stories?

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

Counter question: Why do some fans gatekeep their passion and insult those who they deem aren't "real fans" when it only creates a negative connotation with the fandom and convinces people with slight interest in the subject to avoid becoming a "real fan"?

[-] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 16 points 6 days ago
[-] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago

I saw your other post here. You responded to someone who said they enjoyed the Absolute comics by telling them that your question isn't for them because they're not a real DC fan. If you ask me, that makes you the one who isn't a real fan, and in my opinion, makes your current and previous questions entirely disingenuous.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Because you have the strictest definition of "fan" which is "people who think EXACTLY the same as me about this franchise".

[-] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Looks to me like you just arbitrarily decided without actual proof that people didn't read the comics, instead of considering that they DID read them and came to different conclusions than you.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 8 points 6 days ago

This is really stretching the limits of the idea that there are no stupid questions.

[-] early_riser@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

The concept of “real fan” is flawed I think. I’ve never assembled a WH40K model or read any of the spinoff novels, to say nothing of playing the actual tabletop game, but I’d say I’m a fan of the franchise. I’ve played some of the video games (Space Marine, Mechanicus, Boltgun) and enjoyed them. I enjoy reading lore and worldbuilding stuff from wikis even if I’ve never touched the franchise itself, and my knowledge of 40k is almost exclusively from such wikis.

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47778 readers
583 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS