71
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 41 points 2 weeks ago

...

Is he trying to make the argument that the US should control Iran the same way he controls his wife?

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Or control a plane like he controls his life, but either way it ends with "crash and burn".

[-] MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 weeks ago

You have the right to enrichment, but we want an agreement that you don't do it.

What is this semantics stuff? The comparison to his wife works, but the underlying point is nonsense.

[-] Calabast@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago

He's clearly anti-semantic

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Incompetent billionaire’s waterboy says what

[-] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

She's pregnant, and apparently wants to keep it. She wouldn't be skydiving anyway. And if she did wanna skydive, he shouldn't wanna stop her, because she's a human being and not his pet.

this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
71 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

4546 readers
391 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS