233
that's goofy (quokk.au)
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pfried@reddthat.com 1 points 31 seconds ago

People who don't understand the consequences of their votes: Let's not vote for the better candidate because they're not perfect. Then they'll be forced to run a perfect candidate next time.

Democrats: Vote for an imperfect candidate in the primary for the following election cycle.

People who don't understand the consequences of their votes: Third time's the charm.

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Not liberals, democrats. Let's use labels that actually describe the group that's being discussed. Democrats for the most part are conservative, ever trying to maintain the status quo and unwilling to try anything else (meanwhile republicans are fascist not conservative).

Of course, democrats will continue to call themselves liberal and republicans will continue to call themselves conservative no matter how much I insist that they're wrong, but I'll continue to assert this point whenever a convenient opportunity arises.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Not liberals, democrats

Potato tomato. Neoliberalism (the kind of Liberals the DNC leadership are) is the ideology of Thatcher and Reagan and refers to laissez faire economic policy, not ACTUAL liberty for all.

Democrats for the most part are conservative, ever trying to maintain the status quo and unwilling to try anything else

Yup. Still Neoliberal.

meanwhile republicans are fascist not conservative

Yeah, those fascists are textbook ultra-regressive

Of course, democrats will continue to call themselves liberal

Because over 99% of them are. Liberalism ≠ Leftism.

They'll also keep calling themselves progressive, though, which IS left wing and thus NOT what the vast majority of Democrat politicians are.

and republicans will continue to call themselves conservative

Because blatantly lying about what they are and what they do is THE pillar supporting all GOP election success since the 60s if not sooner.

no matter how much I insist that they're wrong

I mean, you're right about one of them and wrong about the other 🤷🏻

I'll continue to assert this point whenever a convenient opportunity arises.

Which part(s)? The part you're right about about, or both?

[-] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 16 points 22 hours ago

American liberals deserve Trump until they get the damn message. You may be able to shame some people on the internet into voting for corporate captured candidates, but come voting day people simply won't turn out for them.

It's just bad strategy. They're addicted to failure.

[-] Whirling_Ashandarei@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

They're already out here trying to lay that groundwork for the next election with the shaming. They know all they have to do is get some actual decent candidates but that's obviously a bridge too far and they'll put forth some ungodly combination of Newsome, Harris, and don't forget Klobuchar waiting in the wings.

[-] spud@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

shapiro, too. please don't elect shapiro.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 12 points 18 hours ago

Forgetting about Pete Buttigeig is both homophobic and a liberal hate crime. We have to remember that he emerges from the depths of some liberal think tank every four years to throw his hat in the ring. Come on, it's 2026....... Gay men can do crimes for the CIA too.

[-] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Pete exists to take enthusiasm from an actual progressive and move it to the front runner whenever he inevitably drops out of the race. He launders votes upstream by splitting votes downstream. Him and Elizabeth Warren play this role frequently.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 3 points 2 hours ago

Yeap, he's basically the human embodiment of chase bank rainbow washing their image a month out of every year.

[-] stickly@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

lay that groundwork for the next election

The fact that "next election" to you means the presidential election is very telling. There are more progressive candidates penciled on the midterm ballots (let alone the active primaries) than there have been in living memory. And that's not counting local progressive candidates that are already in office from this election cycle.

But to hear everyone talk, anything short of a leftist presidency is a failure in the same way that anything short of a spontaneous revolution isn't worth doing. A milquetoast neolib president shackled by a progressive Congress by far the best option in the realm of possibility.


This is what drives left infighting, a complete disconnect on what's desired and what's possible. Some limitations are just so obvious that I don't know how people ignore them.

  • All media is controlled by billionaire corporate interests who have a ton to lose from the left gaining power. The revolution will not be televised and your left political wave will not come through social media. This will not change and you don't have the wallet to fight it.
  • Related, there will never be a viable third party no matter how much wishcasting you project. FPTP firmly entrenched the two party system and it would take a herculean reform effort to uproot it. There's a reason that the Republican and Democratic platforms have shifted all over the map since the 1800s, you can't splinter and keep any power.
  • Following that, the road map for usurping the DNC has already been shown to us. Power is displaced from the bottom up and a presidency is the last thing captured. Unfortunately, as they act as party of controlled opposition, the fight to disrupt that will be harder than it ever was.
  • Finally, the floodgates have been opened to a fascist takeover of the USA. To a certain extent, there's no closing Pandora's box and expectations and plans need to be adjusted for the new world.

So look at those facts and ask simple questions. Can reform by electoralism be attempted in this environment? What is the best chance for harm reduction here? Do the old rules apply in the same way (eg. is not voting blue even an option now)? Can this regime even be removed from office by normal means? What battles will you pick?

If you've really thought through all of that and landed on complaining about Harris and Newsome then I don't know what to say. That is so far down the branch of things we can't change (media narrative control, DNC establishment power, nascent progressive bloc still solidifying) that it's not worth discussing.

[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

To be fair, they are also doing work to discredit the left flank for the midterms, too.

[-] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

They are neo liberal, thats is, capitalists, just ok with people not being wasps. Thats the only difference.

Max left.

I think the frustration is their complete inability to compromise.

[-] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

Oh they compromise all the time, just not with anyone left of Reagan.

[-] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

They dont want to. They are getting what they want, money.

[-] dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its not just money. Its exploitation.

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
233 points (100.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

2285 readers
806 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS