604
submitted 2 months ago by Karmanopoly@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 100 points 2 months ago
[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago
[-] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

Pihole does not stop youtube ads as they are served through youtube's domains. You need ublock or something like that.

DuckDuckGo player does pretty good.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 9 points 2 months ago

Stupid question, but does pihole offer any substantial benefit over using a remote ad-blocking DNS like AdGuard or whatever?

[-] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

They're basically the same thing

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Please ignore the other two commenters.....

Adblockers block ads at the user level, meaning you have to manage the adblocker for each device in your ecosystem.

PiHole and similar DNS based ad blocking technologies OTOH block ads at the network level and only needs one install location to manage content for all devices you have on your network.

This means with PiHole you can have one set of custom rules that block all ads at the network level by using a set of pre-loaded and customizeable DNS blocklists. OR! you can install Ublock on 2 devices in your house and let the other 7 devices that have no access to adblockers (like IoT devices) be subject to the atrocity that is modern advertising.

Additionally, adblockers in browsers can eventually be shut off. See: Google Chrome and Ublock Origin.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But what does a pihole (which is DNS blocking) do that AdGuard's free public DNS (which is DNS blocking) doesn't? Of course uBlock Origin alongside them is better, but what's a pihole specifically doing?

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I was pretty specific as to what advantages PiHole has over Ublock alone.

Please re-read the above comment and lmk if I can clarify anything.

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

He was asking about pi hole versus and AdGuard DNS.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And I was pretty specific about PiHole over AdGuard's public DNS. And to be honest, the person you originally replied to was as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

It’s a good way to dip your toes into learning about Linux, self-hosting, and administering reliable services.

Functionally they are the same though.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Please see my comment parallel to yours.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 6 points 2 months ago

I want to set one up someday. I just need to get around to it

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Story of my life.....

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago

Never given YouTube a dime and never will

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Every single youtube channel needs to start seeding torrents of their videos, and posting those links to other platforms (here, mastodon, etc).

Youtube / google could be defeated collectively if creators were to consistently do this, and interested people had the ability to help seed videos.

[-] ascend@lemmy.radio 26 points 2 months ago

But a lot of YouTube channels get money through youtube

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago

Most of the channels I know ask for donations via patreon or other funding platforms. I don't think youtube pays much except for maybe the top 1% of slop channels.

[-] melfie@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

In most cases, not all that much. YouTube is mainly useful for getting views and building an audience. It’s a combination of revenue sources like sponsors, merchandise, donations, etc., that really make it worthwhile for creators.

[-] JoeMontayna@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

I'm just so tired of the algorhythms. It's like being in a cage mentally.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pineapple@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 months ago

I'm gonna pay you $0 to fuck off (with ublock)

[-] Chef@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

They call it a double-sided economy.

I call it “let’s fuck everyone.”

[-] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

"Perpetrators offer a service that will not be put into effect, or offer a service that solves a problem that would not exist without the racket."

The very definition of racketeering.

[-] mitch404@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

That's basically google's main business. Their business is not in web search, video platform, mobile OS, email or AI, it's ad. People forget Google is an ad company, that uses any tool available to give you ad. If it's free and not open source, you are the product. Either to sell your attention and availability to companies through ads, or to use your data to do profiling, build a more vicious ad platform and sell your data on the side.

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Its much better to pay YouTube so the YouTubers get money based on what the audience wants, and not what the Advertisers want from Youtube.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 8 points 2 months ago

Why is it a random picture of Will Ferrell though? Why are recent memes like this?

[-] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

I don't pay anything. Just use newpipe/ublock/smarttube

[-] poke@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Storing and serving videos is expensive, they have to pay for it somehow. Either you pay directly or someone else pays for you (through an Ad). I don't see why this is inherently a problem.

I can see arguments on if the specifics are a problem with how they're going about it, but the fundamentals make sense.

[-] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago

It always feels like YouTube is double dipping though. Not with what the post is about; that's either/or, obviously.

But Google makes a nice profit collecting user data and behavior, and then selling that to advertising companies. That happens regardless of using an adblocker, and I'd be shocked if it doesn't also happen regardless of YT premium.

But at the same time, Google also IS an advertising company; they use their user data collection platform to also show ads to users, getting paid again.

So personally, even if YT wasn't owned and operated by a shitstain of a capitalist eldritch horror company, I'd still have zero qualms blocking all their ads: they're making money off of me regardless.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago

I've said this a few times in various places, but I'm really surprised we aren't allowed to bid for ad space for ourselves to not show an ad the way advertisers do for ads. Obviously a flat monthly rate is simpler, nobody is denying that, but just from a purely "free market" perspective (which shareholders love to say they want while using the government to crush opposition) why can't I pay slightly more than whatever small amount of money someone is paying to show me an ad to not see the ad?

Realistically I don't think we'll ever see that because it's a fairly complicated. I don't have any hard data, but I can't imagine that the majority of users using something like YouTube Premium are getting a "good deal." Sure, some folks probably watch all day every day and they get the better end of the deal, but I'd bet for a lot of folks YouTube makes more money off charging the subscription than they would showing the ads. Which is sort of an odd scenario we've gotten ourselves into (but amazing if you're a company that serves ads).

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ductTapedWindow@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago

Why the fuck am I looking at a picture of Will Ferrell and not Ricky?

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago

Some of us pay ourselves to install an ad blocker and then we keep our money and we don't get any ads.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 3 points 2 months ago

Wait, you guys are getting paid to not see ads??

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago

I pay myself in handjobs.

[-] BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

The perfect crime.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago
[-] DERRALEXANO@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

What’s that have to do with Ricky Bobby?

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 months ago

Grayjay is great for YouTube too

[-] Steve@communick.news 3 points 2 months ago

Yes.
I signed up with Google Play Music All Access in its two month intro way back when. At the time it was $7.99mo for life. They included YouTube Red when that launched. Now after all the name changes and price hikes, I'm still locked in at $7.99. I'll keep it as long as that lasts.

[-] jeffep@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Add to this that companies would prefer showing their ads to paying customers (who have some money to spend), not the free tier plebs

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You all deserve this and worse. No reason to complain about it. This is what everybody wanted.

[-] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'd have paid the fee for ad-free YouTube if it didn't also come with an (expensive) subscription to YouTube music.

Nowadays though I don't want to give Google money for anything, even incidentally. I just use Ublock Origin.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
604 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

55994 readers
554 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS