239
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago

Another Shart of the Deal from the nine-dimensional chess player.

It's almost like the dumbest fucking people all banded together to find one of the dumbest people they could find to "lead" this country. JFC. And they still love this asshole.

[-] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

thoughts from beyond braindead

'Hey, this guys a dumbass, and he made it to president, there's time for me to sparkle yet mama'

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago

“Once the email arrives and Iran completes its assessment, vessels are given a few seconds to pay in bitcoin, ensuring they can’t be traced or confiscated due to sanctions,” Hosseini told the newspaper.

Oh shit, it's one thing to be on the wrong side of the US Army. But the Iranians are about to be on the wrong side of Monero shills, who will loudly proclaim "Bitcoin isn't untraceable, they should use Monero instead" from the comfort of their parents' basement....

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

do people honestly think any crypto is fully anon? or are they just trolls?

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 18 points 1 month ago

There are several that are indeed designed for anonymity, such as Monero or Zcash. And others that have mechanisms for anonymity within them, such as Ethereum's Tornado Cash mixer or Aztec rollup.

[-] redsand@infosec.pub 7 points 1 month ago

I think the reporter is just misunderstanding. Iran and North Korea don't have any reason to care if you can "trace" the transaction. They just need confirmation which bitcoin is slow at so Iran should defiantly investigate better options. Ideally options that will be quantum secure by Q day

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

10 minutes is nothing in this context. There's so many Bitcoin exchanges that it can't effectively be stopped.

[-] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

Normally under optimal network conditions. Iran has a unique set of connections to the internet, is up against the PayPal mafia and trading with the countries who tie it into fiber. It's a strange threat model

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Iran doing the hard pivot to become the new Singapore was not what I had on my 2026 Bingo Card.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Theyre gonna be the new global tax haven?

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago

The politics of the thing aside, couldn't they have found a currency that doesn't burn fucktons of energy?

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago

In the specific case of Iran and Bitcoin, using a currency that requires expenditure is actually a benefit. It increases demand for the very thing that they're selling.

More generally, though, there are plenty of cryptocurrencies that don't burn significant quantities of energy. Anything running on Ethereum has been validated using proof-of-stake since 2022.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I have heard that at least drug dealers are using Monero now. At least the ones that I have second hand familiarity with.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Crypto is much more efficient than any FIAT currency.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

I meant non-bitcoin crypto. I'm not 100% clear on this, but AFAIK there are less energy-intensive coins.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that is the problem here.

[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Could you imagine if this is what causes the US to finally go all-in on electric?? I mean, it won’t because petrol companies own the government, but I’d still like to fantasize

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Hardly, Western oil companies are making out like Bandits on this.

[-] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It won't be long before it gets renegotiated to $5. Art of the Deal!

[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Haha! I can see Trump threatening over this, sending demands and walking away saying “job done” with the higher price as you point out. Priceless!

[-] Verdorrterpunkt@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

No price on LNG? Probably just left that out.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

I don't know how many barrels of oil a ship holds, but this seems significantly less than the 2 million per tanker they were saying they were going to charge just a couple hours ago on the guardian at least.

[-] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

About 2-4 million barrels so the math checks out

[-] shweddy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Aptitude in arrangements

this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
239 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29942 readers
1932 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS