107

Google teamed up with Samsung once again to build the Tensor G3, the chipset that powers the new Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 Pro. It comes out of Samsung’s 4nm foundries and features a 9-core CPU (1x Cortex-X3 + 4x A715 + 4x A510) and an ARM Mali-G715 GPU.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

Personally, I stopped caring about benchmarks years ago. Real world usability and, more importantly, battery life are what make or break a phone for me.

[-] corey389@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I don't really care about benchmark, however I care about modem specs and hardware and the 8 modem is definitely lacking.

[-] coffinwood@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Benchmarks could become interesting in seven years when the Pixel 8 will still get software support. Making this big promise and starting off with this mediocre SoC is either brave or....not very foreseeing.

That's quite a bottleneck and efficiency can't tackle every software challenge from here to the year 2030.

Wasn't there already a feature or two that the "old" Pixel predecessor won't receive?

[-] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 17 points 1 year ago

Woah, so that's nearly half the FPS compared to SD8Gen2, and about 3/4th of Gen1. :/

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Funny how one of the criticisms against the Xiaomi 13T Pro I posted about a few days ago was the Dimensity 9200+ SOC.

I've never heard anybody complain about the SOC in Pixel phones.

Yet the Dimensity 9200+ SOC in the Xiaomi 13T Pro is way faster and more efficient than Tensor G2 in the Pixel 7, and remains faster and more efficient than Tensor G3 in the Pixel 8. In fact it's only beat by Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 on Android.

"except for the SOC" https://lemmy.world/post/6513457 Top comment, 9 upvotes?

But no one comments about the way weaker SOC for the Pixel phone?!?!

https://lemmy.world/post/6286959?scrollToComments=true

So a slightly weaker SOC in the Xiaomi 13T Pro than the absolute best in any Android phone is worse, than a way worse SOC in the Pixel 8 Pro that is way more expensive?

The Pixel 8 Pro Tensor G3 doesn't even match the 2 years older Snapdragon 8 gen 1 which came out in q4 2021.

[-] skulblaka@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

There are a multitude of reasons I personally wouldn't buy a Xiaomi, most notable of which is data security concerns. But the SOC performance isn't one of them.

I wonder if you got hit with a little corporate astroturfing? I doubt there are many corps on Lemmy yet but if your post is findable by a search engine it's only a matter of time before they arrive, if they haven't already.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yes I understand some may have security concerns, we debated that too, that's not the point here. The point was specifically the criticism of the SOC, which IMO is absolutely stellar.

I'm surprised there is absolutely zero criticism in a major thread on the Pixel 8 here with 145 posts. When the Tensor chips are clearly worse on both speed and efficiency? Considering how much attention the issue got regarding the Xiaomi 13T Pro, despite it's both cheaper and has a way better SOC.

Maybe astroturfing is an issue, but it is illegal in almost all countries, so I hope not.

[-] HidingCat@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe bad perception? Mediatek for a long time produced a bunch of cheap chips. Kinda like if UniSoc produced a Snapdragon 8 G2 killer, I think plenty will be sceptical, me included.

[-] Hikiru@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Please just use snapdragon and I’ll buy a pixel

[-] EddieTee77@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

They won't. They used to do that prior to the 6. They are able to offer longer support and they claim more features (AI and camera mostly I think) this way.

[-] Porka_911@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

Why, what's wrong with their chip - genuine question? Something can only get better through iterative design and refinement.

[-] deadcream@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

I don't care about gaming performance on a phone, but battery life in Pixel 7 have been worse than in competitors like Galaxy S23.

[-] Defaced@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I would never believe that in my entire life. Samsung batteries are the worst, they die quickly and have short lifespans, not to mention they expand and blow up of you don't use your device.

[-] deadcream@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Exynos Samsung batteries. Tensor is based on Exynos, and S23 has only Qualcomm variant. That's why Pixel 7 drains battery faster than S23.

[-] jsh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That and a poor thermal design.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Battery life <> life span

Life is how many hours on a charge, while life span is how many charges.

According to GSMarena the battery life of the Pixel 7a is 76h, The Samsung S23 is 101h. S23 Ultra is 126h.

76 hour for the Pixel 7a is a pretty poor result.

https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s23-12082.php

https://www.gsmarena.com/google_pixel_7a-12170.php

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This Tensor G3 chip doesn't even match the 2 years older Snapdragon 8 gen 1 from 2021.

There are cheaper phones with way better SOC like the new Dimensity 9200+ Which is both faster and more efficient.

The Pixel Phone is a cool phone in some ways, but the SOC absolutely isn't on par with what other companies have. At best it would be ranked fourth after Apple, Qualcomm and Mediatek who are all way ahead.

[-] Porka_911@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Better at what though. I think it's all relative. I've had no set backs I can ever think of using my Pixels. Image processing I guess could be quicker, but is that really a deal breaker?

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Either faster or more power efficient. Compared to the Pixel 8 Pro / Tensor G3, there are options that are better at both.

[-] amenotef@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Performance I don't give a shit.

But efficiency I care a lot especially in a laptop. Much more on the phone.

Pixel 5 with a 3 year old mid range SoC can run android 14 UI at 90 FPS pretty much fine.

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's a perspective I didn't consider

[-] amenotef@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah so for Pixel 8 you just need a bit more for 120Hz instead of 90Hz.

A different story is for gaming. But for mobile gaming I'm more a fan of Steam Deck or Nintendo Switch. Devices that have higher TDP.

[-] _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Efficiently does nothing? Could be worse.

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're right it definitely isn't exciting news though

[-] 8ender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Google really wrestles with either making the Pixel a flagship phone or a cheap and cheerful mass market model and it shows. Their last few attempts seem to end up with something that is a mushy pile of “okay”

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Recently they've been making a pro, a regular, and an "A" version of their phones. I think pixel should be the premium line and they should alternate regular and pro models every other year. Then create a lower spec cheaper model, under new branding, that comes out every three years. Maybe bring back the Nexus line.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
107 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59407 readers
2256 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS