Except the provision in question was copy pasted from an old law where it existed for decades without any change.
I find the tendency on Lemmy to see a conspiracy in every law concerning.
Criticise the law for what it does (there is enough here for it) and be wary of potential abuse. But sometimes warm water is just warm water.
It existed for decades in times of war and tension.
It is something completely different that they want us to ask for permission in times of peace, which they changed this year.
I am against this law, just to clarify. But I would argue we live in times of war and tension today. We have a war in europe right now.
Also this isn't a new law but a remain of the cold war era.
Not quite, this particular paragraph was identical in the cold war era but the other paragraphs, mainly defining when it is in effect and when not, were changed. This made the law applicable since January 1st of this year. So previously this rule was only applicable during war or "conflicting times" and now it always is.
Thank you for the correction! I didn't know that.
The government can and will change that law when they decide it is needed. Just because they are not enforcing it right now doesn’t mean they can’t find you guilty at a later date.
You should never need permission from the government to travel.
not enforcing
Seems like the law doesn't apply here not that it's not enforced. If war does come similar law will be passed ether way.
I'd agree with you though from philosophical pov - the government should never be allowed to contain you even if you're dodging the draft.
It's an extra hurdle to jump through, and it's sexist.
Then what is the point of doing any of thi, oh other than tracking the citizens movements and to set the ball rolling on more draconian shit down the line
Do you have a source that says the government has to grant your request? I tried scouring the law and it seems true but I struggle with the lingo.
Also the changes that were last made to the law seem to explicitly differentiate between war and none war situation as to which paragraphs are applied so they could have applied that paragraph only to situations of war. So I still think a Discussion and some scrutiny is warrented here as to why we "kept" this rule.
In other words, meaningless paperwork just to keep the population disciplined. Germans 🙄.
Stop voting for right wing parties, folks
That decision was not done by right wing parties.
Last time I checked CDU was a right wing party? And the sPD will do most of their bidding to be in power
Ehhhhh CDU is center right. They're very far from parties like AFD.
Center right is still right wing. I mean, it’s right there in the name.
They're not center at all, stop normalising Nazis.
CDU is a center-right party. In recent times even more right.
Doesn't the CDU have the relative majority right now? That is a right-wing party.
In this case, I would advise them to simply ignore the law, or protest to have it revoked. It does not make sense.
"When Russia attacks I want someone else to defend me"
I will absolutely defend Germany when Russia attacks, but I will not fight any of Americas and Israels wars!
Not even against America and Israel?
What a beautiful strawman you built there.
No, they want to leave Germany instead of making someone defend them there.
I hope to leave people like you behind when someone attacks:)
I can promise you Russia does not care to attack any of the EU. If you've been tricked into believing something different, get a better education.
Yet.
Or ever. Germany has no natural resources and generally has not been enough of a pain since the Soviets freed you from Nazi control to be a danger to Russia. Why would they invade? Germany doesn't even have a large contingency of Russian citizens in it.
maybe you don't know, but Europe does not consist solely of Germany. there are a few more countries to the "right" on the map.
Depends on how exclusionary you define Europe.
If the "lesser white people" are Europeans you are wrong. The Baltics must be free.
Article is irrelevant - we had this discussion in Germany 1 week ago.
TL;DR See comment below.
Sorry, last time I checked the Discussion got started with the article in fr on the 03.04. (Friday) which wasn't a week ago but just before the weekend. And the discussion doesn't seem "finished" to me.
Also as I commented at the comment mentioned by you they could have exempted article 3 from situations outside of "war". Or they could have updated/changed it all together.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/