234
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago

Overly simplistic. Lots of things are the abuse of anxiety.

[-] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

"Lots of things are the abuse of anxiety" doesn't make my statement any less true. As far as extent of abuse goes, I would say religion is near if not the top of the list though.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 10 points 1 month ago

They’re oversimplifying a complex situation to the point of no longer adding anything useful to the discussion.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

true; religion can act as therapy for anxiety

but similar to other self-help like activities it can easily abused to be the exact opposite and even like a cult. like the commies here and trump's cult

[-] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

I'd say it's more accurate to say the abuse of religion/abusive religion uses the abuse of anxiety. Yes, abusive religious organizations exist, and they all use anxiety about some cosmic punishment to excuse and enforce their abuse. I absolutely agree with you on their existence and how terrible they are.

I don't think that's universal and inherent to religion. There are religious groups that are simply good sources of community with either no focus on any cosmic punishment, or that don't agree that any "cosmic punishment" exists.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

There are religious groups that are simply good sources of community

Houses built on sand.

A community built on lying to the gullible and anxious can never last long. It inevitably gets taken over by abusers because it's an easy target.

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A community built on lying to the gullible and anxious can never last long.

There is multiple thousand year+ lineages of morons worshiping gods that they are willing to die for. Its a pretty solid system of control.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Oh, I meant the part where the community is supportive and a positive force for good. But yeah, once it's coopted, it can still last a long time. Just not in a positive way.

[-] Zacryon@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

There are religious groups that are simply good sources of community

Which is an important factor for social animals like us humans. This also underlines that there is a lack of alternatives for people who seek community, social support, etc.. Thereby inviting more people to become indoctrinated.

[-] lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

I think a lot of people need religion to compensate for what society does not give.

Society has failed and it is going nowhere

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Or society has failed because of religions indoctrination and lack of critical thinking.

[-] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Both can be true, two very different sides of the same coin

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

I think religion is the salve of anxiety.
People have anxiety about death and their purpose, and religion relieves that anxiety

[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Its absolutely supposed to be. But then we came along and got the classic human stink all over it. Everything will be fine after you die as long as you recruit all your friends and do as I say and gimme some money. Might do a Holy War too, stay tuned for that.

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I mean, religion is human made, so we didn't just come along.

But more importantly is can be both of these things at once, a salve for your existential anxiety and a tool to whip people into a mindless frenzy; nearly any source of profound hope can be used thusly

[-] orbitz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Maybe that's why I have too much of it then. Also think it does worse for people to believe in things that have no factual basis for being real. We need to learn we are humans, an sentient being but just an animal, we aren't special and we have issues and need to deal with them in a healthy way.

For the record I'm just saying no tangible proof of a higher existence, if you want to believe that's for you is all. To each their own. I just need some proof myself.

Course some people drink a lot not like that's worse than religion healthwise. Long as you don't go on a crusade anyways then the drinking may be better.

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Any source of profound hope can be used as a tool for hate by the hateful, but religion has served very important community functions that we haven't really replaced as we move to atheism, to our own detriment.

I've found some of Britt Hartley's videos on the topic of secular spiritualism (gag at the term) kind of eye opening (and easy to consume) as an atheist myself. This part is this video in particular was great

[-] dadarobot@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Depends on the religion. Catholic, yes.

[-] Zacryon@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Most religions play with fears to get people aligned with the respective religious agenda. I can't name a religion that does not do this in some form. Got an exmple?

[-] dadarobot@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago
[-] Zacryon@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

I suppose karma and reincarnation fit the criteria of using fears. Which is why Buddhism is not an exception imo.

[-] E_coli42@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That's really only Western religions whose job is to answer purpose and providea guide for eternal paradise. That relives the anxiety of why am I here and what's next.

Eastern religions in general have the end goal as enlightenment rather than something external like a Heaven or Hell. That is more of an acceptance of the anxiety and suffering rather than an abuse of it.

[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

I have never seen much difference between reincarnation and the resurrection. One is circular, one is linear.

[-] Melobol@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

It is. But it is also a common moral code and the foundation of a society.

[-] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Areligious people aren't inherently immoral and it was the foundation of some societies because it was used to control people while at the same time pass blame to an intangible entity

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] homes@piefed.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

People don’t need to believe in an invisible sky wizard to have a common sense of either of those things. and I’m not particularly impressed with religious morality, nor with many of the societies that religion has built.

But such a belief is very useful as a common means to control and exploit people, both individually and en masse.

[-] Melobol@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

They don't need to do it anymore. Go back couple hundred years and could be killed. Or even now in couple of places.
Do not judge by one very very short snapshot.

[-] webp@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

Could be killed by religious people? 200 years isn't exactly the stone ages.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If someone needs religion to be moral, it says quite a bit about them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Definition "Religion": identity-anchoring, axiom-based assumption-river, which usually disallows falsification.

Fundamentalist anti-theism is every bit as "religious" as any other religion, even though it orients around absence-of-deity instead of deity.

The Physicalist/Materialist assumption-river/religion which prohibits that mind is real, is every bit as identity-anchoring AND every bit as rejecting-of-falsification as any other religion.

Were Physicalism/Materialism true then mind would only be effect, never cause of the behavior-of-matter.

So, engineered airliners wouldn't exist.

The fact that they do exist, and are produced by intentional-mentation being expressed by matter .. is powerless to falsify Physicalism/Materialism simply because Physicalism/Materialism' is axiom-based, & doesn't allow falsification.

Therefore it's a religion.

Hofstadter's "Godel Escher Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid" was about ideologies, prejudices, religions, & formal-systems. The 2nd edition of it explained that it wasn't only about formal-systems, in the new Preface, because nobody ( Western ) had gotten that implication.

All of those, ideologies, prejudices, religions, & formal-systems, .. ignore evidence that isn't obeying their view.

Empiricism, which is outside-centered, seems to be the only religion/method worth holding-to.

& that means that all spiritual-religions which are empiricism-rooted, also have some chance of being valid.

But without outside-centrism, the biblical Greek "eklegos", then it's an "already-lost war": self-centrism isn't capable of knowing universe, only its own assumptions/beliefs.

That is consistently demonstrated by humankind's history.

Self-consistency-of-view vs completeness-in-knowing-Universe: 2 mutually-exclusive paradigms.

_ /\ _

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

The God that people believe in, in the Bibble, clearly contradicts himself repeatedly. You can straight up write him off through deduction, at which point, you realize you don't even know what the fuck you are believing in, so might as well not, or might as well believe whatever random thing you want.

Might as well believe in a supreme being, but you don't have holy rules telling you how to behave, so you either have to assume it's evil, or it does not exist, because a good spreme being would never leave you to suffer for your sins, and commit immorality through no failt of theirs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
234 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

42244 readers
724 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS