225
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

This dude is an idiot

[-] Mr_WorldlyWiseman 7 points 6 days ago

doesn't this just immediately violate the EU trade deal his cronies lobbied so hard to pass recently?

[-] skiguy0123@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago

The 4th paragraph:

The European Union, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland and the United Kingdom are exempt from the tariff due to existing trade deals with the United States.

[-] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Honestly at this point, if JD hasn't invoked the 25th then someone needs to declare him incompetent and remove him.

[-] oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

He's just as incompetent for not doing it by now.

Is there a meta 25th?

[-] protist@retrofed.com 119 points 1 week ago

Oh my god, Trump wants to lower drug prices, so he's doubling the price of medications available from literally nowhere else.

Years ago, I worked at a hospital that hired an old psychiatrist who we quickly realized was prescribing Geodon to almost everyone. Schizophrenia? Geodon. Bipolar? Geodon. Depression? Geodon. Borderline personality disorder? Geodon. Well, he only last a few weeks before being relieved of duty, and turns out he was in the early stages of Alzheimer's.

This story is about Donald Trump and tariffs.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

Actually lowering prices would require regulation, and he's built his entire corporate campaign on "we're getting rid of every regulation". Much easier to make them look lower in comparison.

[-] jaycifer@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

We just got done establishing that tariffs are not a presidential privilege! What contrivance will they think up this time to “justify” it? Or are we officially past the stage of pretending now?

[-] aramis87@fedia.io 11 points 6 days ago

Unfortunately, they've only established that the 1974 emergency powers act is not a legal way to establish tariffs; all other tariffs established by justifying them through other means are still (potentially) legal.

[-] jaycifer@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Thanks for reminding me, that’s a good point.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Or are we officially past the stage of pretending now?

Pretty sure we're well past that point, but that word "officially" just means you can pick any arbitrary point and call that the "official" point we crossed the line. heh

[-] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 28 points 1 week ago

Looky there! Republicans supporting higher taxes. Again.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

What happened to the Supreme Court's ruling that tariffs imposed by executive order are unconstitutional?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 5 points 6 days ago

Plus SCOTUS made their ruling too narrow and it stopped only some if these unconstitutional tariffs.

[-] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

That was the plan

[-] Jiral@lemmy.org 6 points 1 week ago

It is the little known "who is going to stop me when I break the constitution" loophole in the constitution.

[-] mriormro@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago

These tariffs are illegal. This is all meaningless.

[-] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Illegal? Probably. Will this stop them from enforcing them? No.

[-] mech@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

Are they even announced officially, or does he just "truth" them?

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Oh sweet child, truth social is the official White House communications channel now.

[-] Jiral@lemmy.org 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A lot of pharmaceuticals are non-flexible markets. In other words, companies can simply pass on the 100% tax to those who need the medicine.

[-] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Good, make it harder for people to get the medicine they need to survive, surely that wont radicalize a whole bunch of even more people into hating your fucking guts with the fury of 100 suns.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The problem is we're all too tired and too used to the bullshit. People believe "gummit can't do anything" so don't believe that this shit works - like it works in every other OECD ("Developed") country..........

So just one more thing? It won't be enough.

But that's why we need the continued discussion online, and the protests that don't appear to be accomplishing much of anything yet - we need that groundswell of energy to increase. It's not increasing quickly, but it is slowly increasing.

For example, 5 years ago when I'd talk about how fascism was breaking our democracy, I got some support but mostly feedback. That's changed. So the discussion online has at least made progress. That's the type of thing necessary to get us to making change.

It sucks because it's going to take a long time because the fascists have done a decent job with propaganda and education.

More and more of us need to be more and more fed up to get to the point where enough of us demand change and are willing to fight for it^[in any of the possible ways, from becoming representatives to perhaps actual fighting if we get to that point] - enough to overcome the exhaustion of living like this and the bombardment of bad news.

It's not easy.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 1 week ago

florida rejoice!

[-] Bwaz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Cue big increases in drug insurance prices and in percentage of people who can't afford needed medicines. Just another tax on those who have no say -- taxation without representation like days of yore.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

JFC, this guy is such an asshole.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Christ. And this is already after our few scripts have tripled in cost over the last few years.

[-] Graymouzer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Does he ever stop to think, am I allowed by law to do this before writes these EOs?

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
225 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29329 readers
2171 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS