Fucking hell. Not discounting the deadly consequences to immigrants but gosh what fresh ecological hell will these exert on the already stressed ecosystem there.
Also please note that 70% of people here illegally are due to visa overstaying from a tourist visa. They flew here.
Has anyone ever played this video for PEDOnald and his stupid base?
America spending money on useless shit instead of spending money on its poor yet again
Um, but they will swim under them?
Easy to get trapped or killed doing that sort of thing. They're very big and it's shallow water.
Also, security officers and vigilantes on the far shore have a history of just shooting you.
Actually, Texas slapped barbed wire on the underside of these when they put them up. I feel like the feds might do the same.
Ok, but how are these things changing that? Whether they swim under or cross the river without these things, people with guns are factors already there. If it's too shallow to swim under you can easily climb over. The diameter is 1.5m and they are floating. They are less than 0.5m below the surface max, so if it's really that shallow even a young kid can just stand there and climb over. If it's 0.5m clearance under it it's less than a 5sec swim underneath.
Go down and give it a shot. Let us know if it's as easy as you thought
Oh hell no! Not a chance I'm going to that fascist country. I'm happy on the other side of the pond.
I hope you're not saying that from England.
Indeed I'm not. But there are ~160 countries across 2 ponds. Not just England.
~160 countries across 2 ponds
"The Pond" is traditionally a term Brits use to describe the Atlantic with respect to the US.
Nobody in Japan is calling the Pacific Ocean a pond.
I'm also not from Japan, and again isn't the only country across that pond. Brittain is also bigger than England.
Brittain is also bigger than England.
With the extra "t" bolted on, sure.
I may have misspelled Britain, but even without the extra "t" it consists of 3 countries.
So.. there have been some bouys like this and underneath they put nets and lined the shore with razor wire. Some of them have circular saw blades on them. I’m sure there’s other horrible things I could dredge up but you get the idea.
They know about the swimming and have accounted for it in the most horrific way possible.
“It is inevitable that portions of the buoy system will break free and portions of the [border] wall will fail,” he wrote.
“Even very small changes can have very big consequences,” Tompkins told the Laredo committee.
----
Shaking my head in advance.
Why is it even necessary? Border crossings are at a historic low. If necessary, just put up concertina wire. These can be easily removed when no longer needed.
Why is it even necessary?
First off, it lines a few friendly contractors' pockets to the tune of $3B.
Second off, you get to parade around at the border in front of some big metal tubes to announce "Mission Accomplished!" for your constituents.
Trying to keep us in?
They already got in trouble for this during this regimes first term
Are people still crossing? Wtf would they do that?
This is all in preparation to prevent people from leaving the hellscape the US will become.
Why wouldn't they want people to leave? Slavery?
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.