878
submitted 1 day ago by LiamTheBox@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Source: https://xcancel.com/vxunderground/status/2032600868005310638#m

Yeah, so basically the current prevailing schizo internet theory is that AI nerds have destroyed the internet and created infinite spam.

The advertisement goons are now incapable of determining who is a bot and who is an actual human. The advertisement goons no longer want to pay as much to social media networks.

Social media networks, in full blown panic of losing potential revenue, decided to lobby governments saying "we gotta protect the kids! ID everyone to protect the kids from pedophiles!".

The social media networks know this doesn't really protect kids. But, it does two things (and a third accidentally).

  1. They now can identify who is human and who is AI slop machine, or enough to appease the advertisement goons

  2. Advertising to children is a general no-no from politicians, or something, so with ID verification they can say with confidence they're not advertising to children because it's been ID verification. Basically, they can weed out the children and focus on advertising to adults

  3. The feds can now tell who is human and who is AI slop. This inadvertently helps them with tracking people and serving fresh daily dumps of propaganda, or whatever they want to do.

It's a win-win-win for advertisers, social media networks, the government, and any business which does data collections.

It fucks over everyone else.

Chat, I'm not going to lie to you. This is an extremely good conspiracy schizo theory and I unironically believe it.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] quinnart@lemmy.today 10 points 12 hours ago

This is not a conspiracy. Look at who funded the bill, who wrote it, and who funded the opposition to the bill in each state. Every time one of these passes, each legislating body already has the votes the need to pass before the actual bill material surfaces.

Meta has reportedly funneled over $65 million into a network of four primary super PACs to manage this state-by-state strategy. While they appear distinct on paper to "scatter filings" and avoid centralized FEC scrutiny, they are managed by the same leadership: Brian Baker (a veteran GOP strategist) and the Democratic consulting firm Hilltop Public Solutions.

  1. American Technology Excellence Project (ATEP): The national "umbrella" super PAC that serves as the primary funding hub.

  2. Forge the Future Project: The GOP-focused arm, active in states like TexasFlorida, and Utah. It frames the legislation as a "parental rights" and "pro-family" issue.

  3. Making Our Tomorrow: The Democratic-focused arm, active in Illinois and California. It frames the same legislation as "tech accountability" and "corporate responsibility."

  4. Mobilizing Economic Transformation Across California (META PAC): A California-specific PAC focused on protecting Meta's interests in its home state, particularly regarding AI and child safety regulations.

The "Shadow" Advocate: Digital Childhood Alliance (DCA)

The group providing the "boots on the ground" testimony for these bills is the Digital Childhood Alliance. Investigations have found that:

  • Legal Status: The DCA reportedly has no EIN, no IRS registration, and no incorporation records. It is essentially a "ghost organization" or astroturf group.

  • The Meta Link: Internal filings and investigative reports confirmed the DCA is almost entirely funded by Meta, though its website and testimonies never disclose this.

  • The Mission: They are launching Proof-of-Personhood for exactly the reasons specified in this post. By integrating a unique identifier at the OS-level, they are effectively killing the VPN. Soon websites will start requiring that unique identifier to view “adult” content in order to comply with the government.

How will this data be used? I’ll let you speculate, but let me reassure you that privacy is dead and a bunch of know-nothing geriatric pigs come up with a new way to destroy democracy every day.

[-] metermatic26@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago

Conspiracy theory? It’s not, it’s absolutely true. But they left out the bit about the quasi-alliance between big tech and right-wing extremists.

Tech bro’s want to keep their revenue streams, techno-fascists want to remove privacy barriers that stop them from training AI with your personal data and actual fascists want to crack down on public speech and dissidents.

The political right in both the US and EU are continuously working to remove privacy and surveillance restrictions under the auspices of free markets and innovation.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 18 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

How is this a theory? This is literally what's happening lol

Even if it's not advertising itself pushing it, the rest of what was said is true.

[-] core@leminal.space 4 points 14 hours ago
[-] farfalla@jlai.lu 2 points 13 hours ago

~~feds~~ corpos

[-] kablez@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Advertising doesn't seem like a large enough lever to drive something this globally coordinated.

My read is that governments and large institutions are preparing for the kind of systemic instability climate change is going to produce.

Across the world we're already seeing laws and policies that quietly restrict the ability to organise, protest, or remain anonymous online, while surveillance capabilities expand at the same time. None of this is particularly popular, yet it keeps happening.

Why?

Because the next few decades are likely to involve continuous pressure from climate-driven problems: migration, water shortages, falling crop yields, energy instability, and the political conflict that follows when resources get tighter.

From that perspective, universal ID verification online isn't mainly about ads or "protecting the kids". It's about mapping who is who, who talks to who, and how information spreads.

If you expect future mass unrest, protest movements, or large-scale political instability, that kind of data becomes extremely valuable.

And historically, elites often choose to invest more effort in managing the consequences of systemic problems than in solving the underlying causes.

So instead of "AI spam broke advertising", the bigger story might be that institutions are building the infrastructure to monitor and manage populations during a much messier future.

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago

I absolutely believe this

[-] IratePirate@feddit.org 21 points 1 day ago

The advertisement goons are now incapable of determining who is a bot and who is an actual human.

Bullshit. Social networks track the living shit out of everyone and know exactly what's human traffic and what isn't. Device identifiers (user agent, IP ranges, browser fingerprint, (lack of) ad id, etc.) and behavioral patterns (including purchase history) differ wildly.

Advertising to children is a general no-no from politicians, or something,

Bullshit. Even advertising to kids were outlawed (it isn't), politicians could be just bought off by advertisers to turn a blind eye. This is particularly true for the land of their formerly free and home of the formerly brave where corruption is now an above-the-counter item, practiced out in the open by the president himself.

[-] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 7 hours ago

Bullshit. Social networks track the living shit out of everyone and know exactly what’s human traffic and what isn’t. Device identifiers (user agent, IP ranges, browser fingerprint, (lack of) ad id, etc.) and behavioral patterns (including purchase history) differ wildly.

https://github.com/xvzc/SpoofDPI plus a browser fingerprinting blocker.

[-] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

I thought land of the free and home of the brave was Scotland

[-] imjustmsk@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

What a beautiful world we live in. 

(my first ever post in the fediverse lol) 

[-] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago
[-] UnimportantHuman@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just cut off a friend who tried to tell me racism isn't a choice. Knew him for over a decade but he fell into an algorithm that he became obsessed with. He really believed he was seeing the "truth" finally.

[-] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago

Tell him that thinking white people are genetically predisposed to be racist is Woke 1.0 and belongs in the past. We are on 3.0 now and we call pigs [REDACTED]. (Yes I know you meant he is being turned into Hitler by Instagram, just a joke.)

[-] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Average Andrew Tate fan

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

You’ve made the right choice. Just watch out for the crazies, they mask well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BeN9o@lemmy.world 146 points 1 day ago

"Advertising to Children is a general no-no.."

Uhh what? Advertising to children is like no1 priority. That's why Kim K etc is in fortnite, happy meals are bad food aimed at kids and of course standard TV adverts can be heavily aimed at kids, even tho its the parents spending the money.

[-] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

Advertising to children is significantly more tightly regulated, for the very reason that they're so damn thirsty for it.

[-] kieron115@startrek.website 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I grew up in the 90s and there were some absolutely unhinged ads during saturday morning cartoons. This spoof is only slightly crazier than an actual capri sun liquid cool commercial.

https://youtu.be/eyd51lvu3xw

[-] starblursd@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago

Data collection* from children is a general No-No but with this they don't have to collect the data to know they're a child and can now specifically target them without having to collect data first. Thereby avoiding coppa fines

[-] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Facebook has known since over a decade that under 13s are on their networks and instead of booting them, the CEO (whoever he is) decided to make the platforms more addictive to under 13s. Real quote from the LA court case going on right now.

Also, the new CEO of Xbox Gaming is ex-AI Head of Microsoft and the ex-Head of under-13 policy at Facebook. So she did everything the CEO (whoever he is) asked her to do, including making the platforms more addictive and pushing back on govt intervention.

[-] FukOui@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago

Plausible considering it's been shown that meta is the one responsible for lobbying this shit

[-] kieron115@startrek.website 80 points 1 day ago

This isn't even a conspiracy theory, it's been investigated and found to be mostly true.

https://tboteproject.com/git/hekate/attestation-findings

[-] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago

I never thought about it until I clicked on this link, but repositories are actually a really good format for investigative journalism. Allows you to organize all the supporting documents alongside the article in an organized way.

[-] msage@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

It's great for most written things in society.

Laws? Oh yes, please.

Any official communication? Thank you.

Even mundane things like cooking guides would benefit from history and versioning. Imagine entire family sending their branches for favourite pie/turkey/whatever else.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 4 points 13 hours ago

Grandma's brunch grits git branch

[-] ivn@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 3 points 1 day ago

That's actually vx-underground source for this post: https://xcancel.com/vxunderground/status/2032562782248349793#m

[-] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

It's not even a conspiracy, it's just corporations and politicians behaving according to individual incentives and communicating about it publicly with a basic level of indirectness to avoid outrage.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] No1@aussie.zone 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is just the beginning.

You think it's just about ID?

Politicians in both the UK and Australia have spoken about banning VPNs, because VPNs have been used to avoid age verification in those countries.

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 hours ago

If you want to see where we're going, look no farther than Russia's Internet. Which is currently much worse than China's.

So be prepared for your service to be degraded to unusability.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gray@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 day ago

I don't love the word schizo, but otherwise I am on board

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] eli@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Want a real schizo theory?

People are going to use the ID verification thing to see which accounts are child accounts, pull all details for those accounts and make a database of children's accounts, and then sell that information to bad actors who plan to traffic children.

[-] freedickpics@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Doesn't even need to be intentional when there are virtually no consequences for leaking that info

[-] murmelade@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Palantir Orphan Hunter

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 2 points 21 hours ago

It is the third option. For a schizo conspiracy it makes a lot of sense.

[-] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago
[-] kahoodd@reddthat.com 17 points 1 day ago

and we have upcoming android lockdown👌

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

That actually makes sense.

[-] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago

Honestly, the only "schizo" part of this is the assertion that people aren't allowed to advertise to children, otherwise this all makes perfectly sane sense.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

Seems like the most obvious fucking thing in the world

[-] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

If of wasn't Metas involvement, I was thinking it would be the first stab at a social credit system.

Is definitely a ploy to identify us all and certainly not to protect children.

[-] Anarki_ 33 points 1 day ago

Posted on Twitter lmfao

[-] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

The bad news for the AI goons is that the capitalists have squeezed us so hard that we no longer have any money to spend on the products we're programmed to lust after. Not sure what the end game is.

[-] null@lemmy.org 11 points 1 day ago

It makes more sense than it doesn't.

Maybe not as shadow cabal type of collusion, but as the path of least resistance that all these entities would find themselves going down independently... at the same time.

[-] Avicenna@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

I mean AI goons are destroying the internet and open source, that much is true.

[-] obey@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So what every website will have to have age verification? Or else if your website lacks such controls you go to jail?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
878 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

47150 readers
760 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS