235
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 weeks ago

I got diagnosed last year at 30 years old. I had lower abdominal pain that lasted a little over a month that I figured was IBS from a traumatic life event that recently happened. It was slowly improving until one day I woke up in extreme abdominal pain. There wound up being a mass at the very start of my large intestine.

The doctors found no obvious reasons as to why it happened- no family history, no substance abuse, no excessive energy drink or alcohol consumption. I now make a large effort to cut out as much processed food in my diet as I can.

[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 27 points 3 weeks ago

Also up your fiber. Low fiber is linked to increased colon cancer risk and most Americans get well below their recommended daily dose.

Glad you're still kicking with the living though and good luck

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I doubt seriously that this epidemic is a fiber problem. This generation is ingesting something we shouldn’t be. I’d suspect plastics, but we’ve been eating out of Tupperware since the 1950s. Maybe PFAS? Maybe a newer plastic formulation? A more recent pesticide like Roundup? Some preservative we didn’t start using until the 1990s?

I impatiently await the scientific study that reveals the right link.

[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 16 points 3 weeks ago

You're going to be disappointed because there's almost never any one thing.

We know, for a fact, that lower fiber intake increases colon cancer risk. So if you lower fiber intake while also increasing ingestion of something that increases risk, well how do you say which is the right link?

Oh, this goes with all the normal caveats of studies still need to be done, I'm not a doctor just try to stay informed, etc, but some more recent studies have shown a link between excess sugar intake and increased colon cancer risk. The sugar source doesn't seem to matter so much as amount (so honey vs high fructose corn syrup doesn't matter). We've been slowly adding more and more sugar to everything, at least here in America, so shrugs eat less sweets and more beans.

[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I have to say, I don't think it's going to turn out to be any one thing, but it's probably a lot of somethings that are different for Gen X and Millennials vs Boomers.

Maybe it's related to eating processed food during some kind of critical window that occurs earlier in life (and processed food just didn't exist to the extent that it does now when my dad was growing up), but comparing the current diets of most boomers to most millennials, I have to say I know a lot of boomers that have continued eating like America did throughout the 90s, while a lot of millennials began making healthier food choices.

Like this seems to be at least one reason that the fast food industry is dying, especially now that it's not even cheap anymore.

I know a lot of boomers that have diets like my dad, and good lord that man ate bologna and other processed meats and foods non stop when I was growing up. He also smoked for several years. He's coming up on 73 and cancer free so far. Granted that's an n of 1, but it also seems there was a reason it was trendy for boomers to scoff at millennials for enjoying their avocado toast for breakfast instead of bacon and eggs.

For people over age 65 colorectal cancer is “continuing to decline rapidly by more than two percent a year”, Siegel said, whereas for younger people, it’s jumped from the fifth to the first leading cause of cancer death since the 1990s.

There seems to be little doubt it is hitting earlier for younger generations, but decreasing in the boomers that were feeding us the processed foods and also eating it over the same length of time we were growing up. Is it just because of screening?

It's also not like it's only hitting younger poor people. Even Kate Middleton was suffering from it a couple of years ago. Granted you never know how somebody eats, but given the relationship between income and food deserts, I would expect income level to be a stronger predictor.

Some populations are more at risk than others. Alaska Natives have the highest documented colorectal cancer mortality in the world, but Siegel said that, because the total number of Alaska Natives is so small, it’s hard to get funding to study why.

Also found this to be really interesting. There are very high poverty rates in Alaska, but junk foods and processed foods can actually be cost prohibitive since everything has to be imported. Also would expect less fast food consumption in Alaska for similar reasons.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

could be genetic bottleneck population? limited diversity increased for lethal alleles to appear in a small population.

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

There's a ton of sugar in canned beans, especially baked beans.

[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago

Baked beans sure but I just checked the can of black beans and the can of chickpeas on my shelf. Only thing in ingredients is beans, water, salt.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

sugar isnt usually increasing the rate of colon cancer, makes you susceptible to diabetes type 2.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

E. All of the above

[-] LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago

I read a study about consumption of processed meats a while ago as a contributing factor but scientific studies that affect corporate bottom lines often get buried

[-] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Have a gander at 4 known digestive carcinogenic compounds that are used on american food that are banned everywhere else.

Add in the known carcinogenic effect of over processed and fried foods we are probably on to something.

A single data point but Owsley famously wouldn't touch fiber and only ate raw meat all of his life and he didn't die of colon cancer.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago

nitrates are in most cured meat, also celery salt as well if you are looking for nitrate free products, but it has celery salt, since celery acumulates nitrates naturally. some people can actually smell and taste the nitrates easily, its a very awful smell and the taste too.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

teflon maybe? idk. maybe it's a left handed type thing where now we notice, or we all just died and/or suffered and were just "picky eaters" before.

[-] Lilac 2 points 3 weeks ago

You might want to consider nano particles. I learned about them in chemistry class not to long ago. It honestly sounded very concerning. Apperantly they are even used in foods and can end up in the water supply. They do bring some health risk which haven't been study too well as its a relatively new field. Some of them have been linked to cancer tho I think. Regulations also seem to be lacking.

I couldn't find out much about them, which honestly is probably due to my lack of research skills and low frustration tolarence at that time

[-] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 23 points 3 weeks ago

Got a test coming up in about a month for the first time closing on 48. It's such an obnoxious thing to try and deal with because nobody wants to talk about why their guts and ass are all messed up.

I think the best way around it is to recognize that it's just like any other medical thing. Throat hurts you go get it looked at, why not the other end of the path too.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago

Rectal bleeding, bloody stool, and narrow poops. You might also get intermittent constipation with no apparent cause, and a feeling like something is constricting your intestine.

Unfortunately it sounds like this isn't because other cancers have fallen, just that this has increased.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

This is also a function of the Manosphere bro diet and the trend of only eating protein. Those diets slow digestion and allow carcinogenic metabolites from gut bacteria to accumulate in the colon.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 10 points 3 weeks ago

Leading cause of cancer death for under 50's. Heart disease reigns supreme last I checked for untimely demises.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

Age 25-44 the leading cause of death is unintentional injuries for males and cancer for females.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 7 points 3 weeks ago

Reminds me of those why women live longer videos I saw on the internet.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago

In USA, not the rest of the world. But Americans never ask why some diseases are rare outside the US.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think heart disease is up there for most of the world. India has a huge problem and huge population. Most western countries have similar diets to the USA, albeit not as bad with less obesity but still much more than precious generations.

The zeitgeist on here is that Europeans and Japanese people eat perfect diets. Yes. Italians turn their nose up at crap pasta. There is still fast food everywhere just not like the levels in the USA.

Germany pretty much eats it's body weight in kebabs. France adds butter and cream to everything to bring joy. England is even more industrial than most of the USA with the diets to match. These are not necessarily bad things. I love butter and cream too, but we need to be realistic and accurate when looking at health outcomes and risk factors.

Sure, there is more good quality food and ingredients and less fast food and less obesity, but the trajectory is in the wrong direction.

Heart disease is a problem worldwide. And a growing one. With aging populations, it's gonna continue to get worse.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

Really? Interesting. One wonders if it has to do with all of the fat people here. I know, I'm a real detective. /s

But I bet the higher heart disease follows to all the fat countries, a quickly expanding list. India is over 30% I think now, traditionally skinny. The UK, Aussies, Canadians, all fat, about 50% overweight. US is about 50% overweight in white people, men and woman about equal. East Asian Americans are rarely ever overweight, but black and hispanic woman especially have really high rates, the NIH breaks it all down by demographic.

But there are a bunch of other countries getting overweight I think.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Got my first colonoscopy coming in two weeks.
Fingers crossed.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

plus side of colonscopy any polyps they find they cut asap and biopsy it, if you're younger group, you might be able to ask for genetic testing for cancer syndromes.

[-] Bluewing@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Pro Tip:Whisk(e)y is considered a clear liquid. And if you are lucky, you can have your colonoscopy at a teaching hospital and get to have a train run on your ass by 3 or 4 med students practicing on you while you are sedated.

Good Luck! I'm pullin' for ya!

[-] Shadowcrawler@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago

Eat shit, die from it, i see no problem here.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

arnt alot of people found to have the cancer syndrome, like lynch since cancer found under 50+ are often people with genetic mutation for it, rather than sporadic caused like from red meat, cigarettes,,,,etc.

[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Some populations are more at risk than others. Alaska Natives have the highest documented colorectal cancer mortality in the world, but Siegel said that, because the total number of Alaska Natives is so small, it’s hard to get funding to study why.

I don't doubt that it is difficult to get funding (especially now), but seems kind of dumb.

If anything such a small population in a relatively isolated environment seems like it would allow researchers to better control variability. Unless it's strictly a genetic risk factor, it would seem that any significant environmental risk factors they find could then just be helpful when determining what risk factors to consider in bigger heterogenous populations, right?

[-] recursive_recursion@piefed.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

You sure it's not Trump and his cancerous bootlickers?

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

If it's not one type of cancer it's another. I'm certain a scientist found a way to kill cancer cells and the pharmaceuticals buried it. Cancer and flu are highly profitable businesses.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago

flu is pretty much a given, because it has very high mutation rates, so its hard even get a vaccine for it every year. covid, flu, HIV have one of the highest mutagenic rates.

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
235 points (100.0% liked)

News

37047 readers
2563 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS