316
Incoming. One Trump Sponsored false flag act of terrorism coming up.
And AI will “prove” that Dems and “Antifa” conspired with Iran to do it.
Fool me once, shame on me....
Probably should be the people that got us into this mess
Oh…oh good.
False flag attacks are coming. Mark my words.
.... maybe?
With the disclaimer that I'm not at all sad that Khomeini was a casualty, Trump's illegal war against Iran is set to provoke some real attacks in, probably, quite short order.
Khomeini has been dead for 36 years. Khamenei is the guy who was just killed.
Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa
They’re already claiming the Texas shooter was Iranian, so it seems to have already happened.
No need. They've fired and cut did many people that they can just wait for a "natural" one to happen
Remember, Trump needs enough reason to cancel elections....
load more comments
(1 replies)
Some people say they want a terror attack, to get emergency declarations and steal the midterms. I just hope this is not true. A lot of innocent people would die for few remain in power. I don’t know what to believe anymore.
Fascists are in power. That's enough to believe in while you go look for historical examples of fascists being peacefully voted out of office. That ought to keep you busy until oh, his fourth term.
The follow-up is, "Why?"
If Iran were to destroy Mar A Lago, I think we could let it slide.
I'd have to send a thank you letter
Let it slide? No. Medals would need to be given out.
I unconditionally surrender all of Florida on behalf of the usa.
Bezos and his ilk that fled there can go with it
Since you're mentioning Bezos: why not leverage the fact that he and Musk are building rockets? Let them realise their aspirations of colonising the Moon or Mars. But let them do it themselves.
Just call it even
They can have all of Florida as far as I'm concerned.
Even if it's a target that's not widely popular, it will be used to push policies that hurt the people of the US more.
That's how we got the patriot act.
Don't care. As long as that shit-stain is in power, damage mitigation just plays into his hands.
The US is plagued by a cancer, and there's no way to excise it without further casualties. The only hope we have is chemotherapy and the hope that when the smoke clears it's the patient that survives.
Apathetic, moronic accelerationists set us on that path. The consolation is that a bunch of THEM will assuredly suffer too.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Why would this be a shock to anyone? He let hundreds of thousands of Americans die to covid.
Trump is just trying to bring more people onto the side of supporting his illegal war on Iran by proposing an unrealistic risk of danger to the U.S.
A danger that he totally incited in the first place by being a bloodthirty moron.
Hes trying to do "wag the dog" without a dog.
Is that because Noem murdered it?
I say he is preparing the people for an ‘act of terror by Iran’, meaning there is going to be a false flag incident. He can then use that to claim war powers and dismantle the last sliver of US-American democracy.
That’s a bingo
There was some alledged Iranian in Austin last weekend. They claim the guy was wearing an Irani tee shirt.
Same with the religious spin ‘this is a holy war’ crap. If you frame this as god’s plan, then being against the war is being against said plan and god. This is an attempt to bring back the Republicans who naturally oppose this war.
load more comments
(1 replies)
real farquaad energy here
Hilarious watching them push "this isn't a war" over and over again just for Trump to constantly call it a war.
I hope this acceptable risk becomes him.
Like a certain Charles Kirk
Charlie who? Never heard that name before. Must not have done anything important in their life.
He was great in The Shining
An acceptable benefit?
"Some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I am willing to make"
Iran will attack US soil or the gov will do it themselves as justification to cancel the mid-terms
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
316 points (100.0% liked)
politics
28763 readers
2935 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS