550
submitted 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

S. app uninstalls of ChatGPT’s mobile app jumped 295% day-over-day on Saturday, February 28, as consumers responded to the news of OpenAI’s deal with the Department of Defense (DoD), which has been rebranded under the Trump administration as the Department of War.

This data, which comes from market intelligence provider Sensor Tower, represents a sizable increase compared with ChatGPT’s typical day-over-day uninstall rate of 9%, as measured over the past 30 days.

Meanwhile, U.S. downloads for OpenAI competitor Anthropic’s Claude jumped up by 37% day-over-day on Friday, February 27, and 51% as of Saturday, February 28, after the company announced that it would not partner with the U.S. defense department. Anthropic said it was not able to agree on the deal terms over concerns that AI would be used to surveil Americans and be used in fully autonomous weaponry, which AI is not yet ready to do safely.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 57 minutes ago
[-] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 35 points 9 hours ago

You guys have it installed on your phone?? Lord in heaven

Why not just fedex Altman your SSN and mother's maiden name to save yourself the trouble lmfao

[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 7 hours ago

People's phones are my nightmare. I don't want to know and i don't want to see

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Whenever I accidentally see someone else’s phone it haunts me

[-] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 19 points 10 hours ago

Whenever I see a % data, I always believe the actual amount is really low. It just means on Saturday there were 4x the amount of uninstalls compared to every other day, which doesn’t seem much at all

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 7 points 10 hours ago

it’s enough to be indicative

[-] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 7 hours ago

Only if you have the base amount. And still, for a company of this size, it’s not much

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

% is % is %… absolutes are completely irrelevant… 1m people uninstalling facebook is less relevant than 100 people uninstalling

a large % change is always relevant no matter the company size. that’s the whole point

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

For statistics like this you need more information to know whether it's significant. If they have 100m users and 5 people uninstall the app daily, it's not going to make any difference if that number goes up to 15 uninstalls for one day.

[-] sircac@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Indeed, without an error estimated from fluctuations, etc I cannot conclude how significative it was such...

[-] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 7 points 8 hours ago

I've switched to Mistral. It's not quite on the same level of performance but certainly worth not being on a American dubious setup.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 hours ago

Deepseek. Take my data Xi. Please liberate us from our pedophilic ruling class. Please bring us high speed rail. Amen.

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 13 hours ago

I convinced two friends to cancel their monthly sub. I guess that's something.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 13 points 12 hours ago

Every little bit counts

[-] doesit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

Copilot says these are ethical alternatives

[-] blinfabian@feddit.nl 7 points 8 hours ago

copilot isnt even recommending himself. he knows he sucks 😔

[-] doesit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago

It's dangerous when we start calling it a he/she.

[-] sveltecider@lemmy.ca 19 points 12 hours ago

I didn’t have a subscription but I still deleted my account.

[-] cutemarshmallow@europe.pub 11 points 8 hours ago

How people have one is beyond me, both from a moral and a financial point of view.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 50 points 14 hours ago

I am not subscribed to openai. Is there a way for me to not subscribe even harder?

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

I'd say pirate it but well cloud based and all kinda takes the wind from those sails.

[-] Xylight@lemdro.id 14 points 12 hours ago

ai piracy is still possible! Break into the openai servers and yoink the gpt 5.2 weights. and then publish them

[-] ultrafastsloth@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Why would you break in, the AI is Open, is in the name. Just walk in duh

[-] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 10 hours ago

Why bother when you have GLM 5.0 😎

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 19 points 12 hours ago

I'm surprised so many people were paying for it. Seems like more people want less ai not more these days.

[-] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 11 points 8 hours ago

Don't forget we are in a perception bubble here.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 8 hours ago

Yes, but of that many people are already paying and they are still burning through billions, it's even more of a bubble than I thought. The chance of.profitability with direct to consumer is less likely.

So clearly it will be mainly corporate and enshittified versions going forward.

[-] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 11 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

People want less forced AI, but most people are fine with using it whenever they want

I’m one of them

But then I’m a student and work part time as a dev so I see the population that pretty much uses GenAI the most

[-] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 8 points 10 hours ago

Many of us are in our own little bubble. Nearly all regular folk use AI instead of Google now.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Some people are really deep in the sauce

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 68 points 16 hours ago
[-] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Fuck the game up. America makes terrorists and school shooters, and it's often on purpose, so be careful and understand the game.

[-] RustyShackleford@piefed.social 33 points 14 hours ago
[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 36 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

What really sucks is Google is likely to remove all those 1 star reviews, they've done it before when shit like this happens.

Edit: i feel like a good review could be...

1 star. By using this service you'll be helping ChatGPT autonomously surveil you through the government and murder you with robots without any human in the loop. Don't let ChatGPT kill you!

[-] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago
[-] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

How are they tracking uninstalls?

[-] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 hours ago

Probably play store / app store metrics

[-] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

I had no idea that data was public

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Its almost always public when it comes to google.

[-] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago

I believe third party analytic tools and other forms of research help news agencies report this kinda stuff, but also for the likes of google they could just probably buy the data from them

[-] collectif_imaginaire@piefed.social 5 points 12 hours ago

I did it too and for that reason (dod contract)

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I'm-doing-my-part.gif

(I seem to have lost the ability to embed gifs.)

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago

But the fewer people who use it the less money they'll lose

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

i don't have app, but may install to prop the uninstall numbers

[-] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 1 points 16 hours ago

Ehhh. If they weren’t paying customers then it’ll certainly help their burn rate.

this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
550 points (100.0% liked)

News

36270 readers
2505 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS